building a better future - Cemex
building a better future - Cemex
building a better future - Cemex
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
advisory panel members<br />
and statement<br />
CEMEX 2011 sustainable development report<br />
Sustainability Reporting Advisory Panel Statement<br />
CEMEX is operating in an extremely difficult business<br />
climate and in 2011 consolidated its activities to ensure it<br />
remained competitive. These changes, many painful, have<br />
placed increased pressure on securing resources to implement<br />
its sustainability strategy. We are pleased to note the<br />
continued commitment of CEMEX to sustainability and how<br />
integral sustainability is to its business strategy, including<br />
seeking leadership in sustainable construction. This report<br />
is a testament to that strategic imperative and conveys an<br />
important message to the market.<br />
Scope of our review<br />
We reviewed an advanced draft of the CEMEX 2011 Sustainable<br />
Development Report. We shared with management our<br />
detailed comments and specific suggestions for improvement.<br />
We list here our general observations and concentrate<br />
on those aspects that will further enhance the company’s<br />
reporting in the <strong>future</strong>.<br />
Completeness and clarity<br />
We like the use of the seven priorities as a reporting structure<br />
and are pleased to see its further development in the 2011<br />
report. The report covers the important topics defined as<br />
material by CEMEX and we find it largely complete when read<br />
in conjunction with supporting material on the web. We have<br />
some reservations and concerns, which we note below.<br />
We encourage CEMEX to find ways to help the reader understand<br />
HOW it is implementing its sustainability strategy<br />
and to provide more evidence of the effects. The report still<br />
contains too many general assertions and too little evidence<br />
of performance.<br />
Fair reflection<br />
It is helpful that CEMEX has clearly outlined <strong>future</strong> challenges<br />
in each priority area. However, the challenges faced during<br />
2011, a year of extreme business pressure for CEMEX, are<br />
not so well reported. We find that the report thus presents<br />
an overly positive view. We ask for the reporting to deal with<br />
the inevitable challenges in implementing the sustainability<br />
strategy in difficult economic times. Such honesty is not only<br />
good reporting practice and required by the Global Reporting<br />
Initiative guidelines, but it makes the many successes of<br />
CEMEX stand out.<br />
Governance<br />
We reiterate our previously noted concerns about how governance<br />
is described. We would like to see greater clarity on the<br />
risks faced and what is being done to manage those risks.<br />
Human rights<br />
As noted last year, reporting on human rights remains inadequate.<br />
But we are pleased to read that CEMEX is reviewing<br />
the implications of the UN’s Ruggie process, completed in<br />
2011, and look forward to learn about the company’s actions<br />
to promote human rights.<br />
Safety<br />
As noted by ourselves and the previous panel, safety remains<br />
a major concern. The number of fatalities, especially among<br />
contractors, is unacceptable. The Chairman confirms this in<br />
his letter and we urge him to put the necessary resources,<br />
beyond policies, in place to make the dramatic improvements<br />
necessary.<br />
Biodiversity<br />
The report should note the <strong>future</strong> challenge posed by the<br />
target of implementing biodiversity management at 100 key<br />
sites by 2015, given that this indicator was static in 2011 (at 38<br />
sites) while a new biodiversity action plan standard was being<br />
developed. We reiterate the call we made last year for CEMEX<br />
to move beyond the fairly vague commitments in the CEMEX<br />
Position Statement on Biodiversity and develop a biodiversity<br />
strategy with additional clear and quantifiable impact (not just<br />
process) targets, based on an overall commitment to Net Positive<br />
Impact on biodiversity across the company’s operations.<br />
In <strong>future</strong> reports, it would be good to see case studies that<br />
detail the results of the implementation of Biodiversity<br />
Action Plans at priority operations, as this is where the real<br />
challenge now lies for CEMEX’s biodiversity management.<br />
Stakeholder engagement<br />
We are pleased that CEMEX now provides detailed descriptions<br />
of its engagement with stakeholders. In <strong>future</strong>, we would<br />
like greater clarity on how CEMEX is turning itself into a <strong>building</strong>s<br />
solution provider, as opposed to a supplier of construction<br />
materials, and how it is communicating this to the market.<br />
Water<br />
Water is becoming an increasingly important environmental<br />
issue and we are pleased that CEMEX reports on its use<br />
of water. We look forward to more information on how it<br />
intends to improve its performance.<br />
We have reached the end of our two-year period of engagement<br />
and thank CEMEX for taking our views seriously. We wish<br />
the company well in its endeavors and urge CEMEX to keep<br />
making progress in its contribution to sustainable development.<br />
< previous 54 next>