17.11.2014 Views

building a better future - Cemex

building a better future - Cemex

building a better future - Cemex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

advisory panel members<br />

and statement<br />

CEMEX 2011 sustainable development report<br />

Sustainability Reporting Advisory Panel Statement<br />

CEMEX is operating in an extremely difficult business<br />

climate and in 2011 consolidated its activities to ensure it<br />

remained competitive. These changes, many painful, have<br />

placed increased pressure on securing resources to implement<br />

its sustainability strategy. We are pleased to note the<br />

continued commitment of CEMEX to sustainability and how<br />

integral sustainability is to its business strategy, including<br />

seeking leadership in sustainable construction. This report<br />

is a testament to that strategic imperative and conveys an<br />

important message to the market.<br />

Scope of our review<br />

We reviewed an advanced draft of the CEMEX 2011 Sustainable<br />

Development Report. We shared with management our<br />

detailed comments and specific suggestions for improvement.<br />

We list here our general observations and concentrate<br />

on those aspects that will further enhance the company’s<br />

reporting in the <strong>future</strong>.<br />

Completeness and clarity<br />

We like the use of the seven priorities as a reporting structure<br />

and are pleased to see its further development in the 2011<br />

report. The report covers the important topics defined as<br />

material by CEMEX and we find it largely complete when read<br />

in conjunction with supporting material on the web. We have<br />

some reservations and concerns, which we note below.<br />

We encourage CEMEX to find ways to help the reader understand<br />

HOW it is implementing its sustainability strategy<br />

and to provide more evidence of the effects. The report still<br />

contains too many general assertions and too little evidence<br />

of performance.<br />

Fair reflection<br />

It is helpful that CEMEX has clearly outlined <strong>future</strong> challenges<br />

in each priority area. However, the challenges faced during<br />

2011, a year of extreme business pressure for CEMEX, are<br />

not so well reported. We find that the report thus presents<br />

an overly positive view. We ask for the reporting to deal with<br />

the inevitable challenges in implementing the sustainability<br />

strategy in difficult economic times. Such honesty is not only<br />

good reporting practice and required by the Global Reporting<br />

Initiative guidelines, but it makes the many successes of<br />

CEMEX stand out.<br />

Governance<br />

We reiterate our previously noted concerns about how governance<br />

is described. We would like to see greater clarity on the<br />

risks faced and what is being done to manage those risks.<br />

Human rights<br />

As noted last year, reporting on human rights remains inadequate.<br />

But we are pleased to read that CEMEX is reviewing<br />

the implications of the UN’s Ruggie process, completed in<br />

2011, and look forward to learn about the company’s actions<br />

to promote human rights.<br />

Safety<br />

As noted by ourselves and the previous panel, safety remains<br />

a major concern. The number of fatalities, especially among<br />

contractors, is unacceptable. The Chairman confirms this in<br />

his letter and we urge him to put the necessary resources,<br />

beyond policies, in place to make the dramatic improvements<br />

necessary.<br />

Biodiversity<br />

The report should note the <strong>future</strong> challenge posed by the<br />

target of implementing biodiversity management at 100 key<br />

sites by 2015, given that this indicator was static in 2011 (at 38<br />

sites) while a new biodiversity action plan standard was being<br />

developed. We reiterate the call we made last year for CEMEX<br />

to move beyond the fairly vague commitments in the CEMEX<br />

Position Statement on Biodiversity and develop a biodiversity<br />

strategy with additional clear and quantifiable impact (not just<br />

process) targets, based on an overall commitment to Net Positive<br />

Impact on biodiversity across the company’s operations.<br />

In <strong>future</strong> reports, it would be good to see case studies that<br />

detail the results of the implementation of Biodiversity<br />

Action Plans at priority operations, as this is where the real<br />

challenge now lies for CEMEX’s biodiversity management.<br />

Stakeholder engagement<br />

We are pleased that CEMEX now provides detailed descriptions<br />

of its engagement with stakeholders. In <strong>future</strong>, we would<br />

like greater clarity on how CEMEX is turning itself into a <strong>building</strong>s<br />

solution provider, as opposed to a supplier of construction<br />

materials, and how it is communicating this to the market.<br />

Water<br />

Water is becoming an increasingly important environmental<br />

issue and we are pleased that CEMEX reports on its use<br />

of water. We look forward to more information on how it<br />

intends to improve its performance.<br />

We have reached the end of our two-year period of engagement<br />

and thank CEMEX for taking our views seriously. We wish<br />

the company well in its endeavors and urge CEMEX to keep<br />

making progress in its contribution to sustainable development.<br />

< previous 54 next>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!