17.11.2014 Views

building a better future - Cemex

building a better future - Cemex

building a better future - Cemex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CEMEX reports zero Category 1 1<br />

environmental incidents in 2011<br />

Through rigorous efforts to standardize implementation of<br />

our environmental management processes, we have steadily<br />

decreased our annual Category 1 incident rate from 19 in<br />

2008—when we first began reporting—to zero in 2011.<br />

CEMEX is now prioritizing the reduction of Category 2 and 3<br />

incidents using root-cause analysis, training, and continued<br />

process improvements through our new, risk-based EMS. We<br />

will begin reporting on Category 2 and 3 incidents in our<br />

2012 Sustainable Development Report.<br />

managing our air emissions<br />

The cement-manufacturing process involves significant<br />

releases of atmospheric pollutants, including nitrogen oxides<br />

(NOx), sulfur compounds (SOx), and dust. Other pollutants,<br />

released in very small or negligible quantities, include dioxins,<br />

furans, volatile organic compounds, and heavy metals (including<br />

mercury). To control these major and minor emissions and<br />

stay in compliance with local and national regulations, we<br />

have steadily expanded our emissions monitoring efforts at<br />

manufacturing operations. In 2011, 80 percent of our clinker<br />

was produced with continuous monitoring of major emissions<br />

(dust, NOx and SOx), while 82 percent was produced with<br />

monitoring of both major and minor emissions.<br />

Rüdersdorf Cement Plant<br />

CATEGORY 1 INCIDENTS<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

08 09 10 11<br />

1 Category 1 incidents are defined as major, uncontrolled spills<br />

or releases beyond site boundaries, and in breach of internal<br />

control procedures and/or standards. These may imply major<br />

damage and/or destruction to protected habitats or species,<br />

and/or material spillage greater than 1,000 liters or 2,000 Kg.<br />

Such incidents require immediate notification and follow-up<br />

with regulators, and may involve legal action.<br />

To further improve upon these efforts, we have updated our<br />

performance targets for 2015, contributed to multi-stakeholder<br />

dialogues in our sector to address the handling of dioxins<br />

and mercury emissions, and aligned our emissions disclosures<br />

with the CSI reporting protocol. While our NOx, SOx, and dust<br />

emissions did increase in 2011, in all cases we are still below<br />

our new 2015 targets, which are more stringent than many<br />

local air-control limits and emissions regulations.<br />

Original<br />

target<br />

New<br />

target<br />

New target<br />

reduction<br />

vs. 2005<br />

baseline<br />

2009 2010 2011<br />

Emissions targets for 2015<br />

Dust specific emissions (g/ton of clinker) 106 89 101 155 120 61%<br />

NOx specific emissions (g/ton of clinker) 1.063 1.134 1.094 1.667 1.600 18%<br />

SOx specific emissions (g/ton of clinker) 410 334 335 520 520 10%<br />

During 2011, we reduced our specific NOx emissions from 1,134 to 1,094 g/ton<br />

clinker, maintained our specific SOx emissions at 335 g/ton clinker and increased<br />

our specific dust emissions from 89 to 101 g/ton clinker. The increase in specific<br />

Dust emissions is mainly due to inaccuracies related to monitoring not done on a<br />

continuous basis in some of our kilns, as we have yet to install monitoring equipment<br />

in 20 percent of our kilns.<br />

< previous 26 next>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!