Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
such as beh<strong>in</strong>d a one-way mirror, we assume that <strong>the</strong> observer’s<br />
presence has been negotiated and that those be<strong>in</strong>g observed are<br />
aware <strong>the</strong>y are be<strong>in</strong>g watched.<br />
The observer is always <strong>in</strong> some respects a participant, as <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
presence will always have some impact on <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g. The level of<br />
participation that is possible or appropriate will vary from one<br />
sett<strong>in</strong>g to ano<strong>the</strong>r. In many general sett<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> goal of ‘just<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>’ is more likely to be achieved through a level of<br />
everyday participation. Non-participation to <strong>the</strong> extent of avoid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
basic human <strong>in</strong>teractions, such as respond<strong>in</strong>g to greet<strong>in</strong>gs, would <strong>in</strong><br />
all likelihood draw more attention to <strong>the</strong> observer’s presence and<br />
potentially heighten <strong>the</strong>ir impact on <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,<br />
participation is unlikely to be appropriate when observ<strong>in</strong>g highly<br />
specialised activity, such as <strong>in</strong> an operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>atre or <strong>in</strong> a child<br />
protection or psychiatric case conference. Even where <strong>the</strong> observer<br />
is qualified to participate <strong>in</strong> such an activity, <strong>the</strong>y are unlikely to be<br />
able to do justice to both roles at once.<br />
While <strong>the</strong> boundaries of <strong>the</strong> researcher’s role should be negotiated<br />
and firmly established prior to commenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> observation,<br />
<strong>in</strong> reality some flexibility may develop <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> role as <strong>the</strong> research<br />
progresses. The role of un<strong>in</strong>volved observer may be more readily<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ed early on <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research when <strong>the</strong> researcher is relatively<br />
unknown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> observation sett<strong>in</strong>g. As those be<strong>in</strong>g observed<br />
become more familiar with <strong>the</strong> researcher’s presence, <strong>the</strong>re may<br />
be <strong>in</strong>vitations, even demands, to participate. In this situation we<br />
would consider <strong>the</strong> degree of role clarity established, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
clarity as to whe<strong>the</strong>r one is primarily participant or observer at<br />
any given time, to be <strong>the</strong> primary issue, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> level of<br />
participation per se.<br />
While <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>the</strong>re will often be a cont<strong>in</strong>uum of <strong>in</strong>volvement<br />
along <strong>the</strong>se dimensions, be<strong>in</strong>g clear about where one is (or wants to<br />
be) at any po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time is <strong>in</strong>valuable <strong>in</strong> two ways. It helps <strong>the</strong><br />
researcher monitor how th<strong>in</strong>gs are go<strong>in</strong>g, and to gauge whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
boundaries need to be adjusted. It can also be helpful for those who<br />
are be<strong>in</strong>g observed. If <strong>the</strong> researcher is clear about <strong>the</strong>ir purpose and<br />
role, and is consistent <strong>in</strong> this, it will be easier for participants to<br />
accept <strong>the</strong> observer <strong>in</strong> that role and let <strong>the</strong>m get about <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
of observ<strong>in</strong>g. In a paradoxical way, participants who understand why<br />
<strong>the</strong> observer is <strong>the</strong>re and what <strong>the</strong>y are do<strong>in</strong>g may be less bo<strong>the</strong>red<br />
by <strong>the</strong>ir presence and <strong>the</strong> observer, <strong>in</strong> turn, may be less likely to<br />
have a negative reactive impact on <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
78