Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
to delay approach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> immediate<br />
crisis <strong>in</strong> order to avoid seek<strong>in</strong>g parental consent at a<br />
time when <strong>the</strong>ir capacity for <strong>in</strong>formed judgement<br />
might be most compromised. This entailed forgo<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> collection of data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial phase of <strong>the</strong><br />
case, thus illustrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ‘trade-off’ which can occur<br />
between ethical and methodological priorities.<br />
There were o<strong>the</strong>r ‘trade-offs’ of this nature. For<br />
example, I decided not to tape-record <strong>in</strong>terviews or to<br />
<strong>in</strong>terview parents before <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>volvement with <strong>the</strong><br />
various services had f<strong>in</strong>ished, both significant methodological<br />
sacrifices, because of <strong>the</strong> risk that parents<br />
might divulge <strong>in</strong>formation which could be subpoenaed<br />
<strong>in</strong> legal proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. The decision not to give<br />
parents <strong>the</strong> option of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviewed throughout<br />
<strong>the</strong> period of service <strong>in</strong>volvement was seen by some of<br />
my colleagues as paternalistic and disempower<strong>in</strong>g. My<br />
reason was that it might be very hard for parents to trust<br />
<strong>the</strong> confidentiality of what <strong>the</strong>y might say to me when<br />
<strong>the</strong>y knew that I was <strong>in</strong> close contact and on first-name<br />
terms with <strong>the</strong> professionals <strong>the</strong>y were see<strong>in</strong>g. This may<br />
be an example of ‘justified paternalism’.<br />
All of <strong>the</strong> children <strong>in</strong> my study were aged ten years<br />
or less, and parental permission was sought to observe<br />
hospital social workers’ <strong>in</strong>terviews with <strong>the</strong> children<br />
through a one-way screen. This was a standard practice<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospital service and colleagues, tra<strong>in</strong>ees and<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>ical supervisors rout<strong>in</strong>ely observed <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>in</strong><br />
this way (with <strong>the</strong> permission of <strong>the</strong> parent and <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge of <strong>the</strong> child). I did not seek parental permission<br />
to <strong>in</strong>terview <strong>the</strong> children as I felt that <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> children could not be justified due to <strong>the</strong> risk of<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r traumatisation. While <strong>the</strong> potential risks could<br />
not be quantified, nor could <strong>the</strong> potential benefits.<br />
However, as <strong>the</strong> study unfolded, <strong>the</strong> issue of<br />
children’s <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research became less<br />
clear cut. For example, on several occasions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
follow-up home <strong>in</strong>terviews with parents <strong>the</strong> children<br />
were unexpectedly present for some of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview<br />
although I had arranged with <strong>the</strong> parents to visit at<br />
a time when <strong>the</strong> children would not be <strong>the</strong>re. As it<br />
36