Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
research data to be analysed by o<strong>the</strong>rs is regarded as an important<br />
safeguard aga<strong>in</strong>st fraudulent research, and secondary data analysis<br />
is very useful as it can allow subsequent <strong>in</strong>vestigation of valuable<br />
data <strong>in</strong> relation to different research questions. For <strong>the</strong>se reasons<br />
researchers are usually required to keep <strong>the</strong>ir data for a number of<br />
years to enable o<strong>the</strong>rs to have access to it. In contract research <strong>the</strong><br />
data typically belongs to those fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> research and thus future<br />
access is not controlled by those actually do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> research. This<br />
can create problems when applied to qualitative research as ‘later<br />
use by different researchers may be <strong>in</strong>appropriate for projects which<br />
collected <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews on sensitive topics’ (Commonwealth<br />
Department of Human Services and Health, 1995, p. 14).<br />
Even when <strong>the</strong> researcher ‘owns’ <strong>the</strong> data, once <strong>the</strong> research is<br />
part of <strong>the</strong> public doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> researcher may have little control over<br />
how it is used and aspects may be selectively quoted. ‘<strong>Research</strong>ers<br />
noted that it was frequently difficult to control <strong>the</strong> use of reports<br />
once <strong>the</strong>y became a part of <strong>the</strong> public doma<strong>in</strong>. They expressed<br />
concerns about simplistic or sensationalist media coverage’<br />
(Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health, 1995,<br />
p. 13).<br />
<strong>Research</strong>ers must <strong>the</strong>refore be aware that what <strong>the</strong>y write may<br />
be used <strong>in</strong> ways o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>y <strong>in</strong>tended. For a research participant<br />
to see <strong>the</strong>ir words used or, as <strong>the</strong>y might perceive it, misused, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
public doma<strong>in</strong> can be a deeply violat<strong>in</strong>g experience even if <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
identity is not revealed.<br />
To disguise <strong>the</strong> verbatim quotes of <strong>in</strong>terviewees by paraphras<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>m would defeat <strong>the</strong> purpose of much qualitative research. The<br />
challenge <strong>the</strong>n is to dissem<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> voices of those previously<br />
unheard <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which privacy is protected.<br />
The researchers do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> older adopted children study described<br />
above did this <strong>in</strong> a novel way (Thomas et al., 1999). They taperecorded<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r children read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transcripts of <strong>the</strong> adopted<br />
children’s <strong>in</strong>terviews and played <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews to prospective<br />
adoptive parents and social workers dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sessions<br />
to enable <strong>the</strong>m to appreciate <strong>the</strong> subjective experiences of adopted<br />
children <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own words. This protected <strong>the</strong> privacy of <strong>the</strong><br />
adopted children while evocatively convey<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir experiences<br />
much more powerfully than <strong>the</strong> written word allowed. This<br />
example highlights <strong>the</strong> sensitive and <strong>in</strong>dividualised ways <strong>in</strong> which<br />
researchers can apply ethical pr<strong>in</strong>ciples.<br />
30