Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ethics and organisations<br />
Observational methods can also be very <strong>in</strong>trusive. The presence<br />
of an observer or <strong>the</strong> awareness that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview is be<strong>in</strong>g observed<br />
through a one-way screen or recorded on film can affect <strong>the</strong><br />
phenomenon under <strong>in</strong>vestigation. This is not just a methodological<br />
concern—it is also a serious ethical issue. As a result of <strong>the</strong> observation<br />
a service provider may have a heightened performance<br />
anxiety which may affect <strong>the</strong> quality of service offered, or <strong>the</strong><br />
client’s anxiety might affect <strong>the</strong>ir ability to make use of what is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
provided.<br />
While <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>trusiveness of such qualitative research methods is<br />
very obvious, even ‘unobtrusive’ research about which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
may rema<strong>in</strong> unaware, for <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>the</strong> perusal of case files or<br />
official records, can constitute a serious violation of privacy. Thus,<br />
whenever records are used for purposes o<strong>the</strong>r than that for which<br />
<strong>the</strong>y were orig<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong>tended, it is important to th<strong>in</strong>k through <strong>the</strong><br />
ethical questions <strong>in</strong>volved. Who should have access to this material?<br />
Is client permission necessary or will agency permission suffice?<br />
Would document-based research be feasible if <strong>the</strong> permission of all<br />
relevant parties had to be obta<strong>in</strong>ed?<br />
Confidentiality<br />
At first sight confidentiality seems a fairly straightforward ethical<br />
issue, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research literature is almost exclusively dealt with<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of develop<strong>in</strong>g data collection and storage systems <strong>in</strong> which<br />
it is not possible to identify <strong>the</strong> research subjects. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
research participants are rout<strong>in</strong>ely given assurances of confidentiality.<br />
But <strong>in</strong> qualitative research this is not always so simple.<br />
In research that is based on a case study method, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
case be a community, an organisation or a family, it can sometimes<br />
be difficult to disguise <strong>the</strong> data so that <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g or participants are<br />
completely unrecognisable, particularly to those familiar with <strong>the</strong><br />
field. To reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of recognition, it is possible to present data<br />
<strong>in</strong> a disaggregated way, such as present<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviewees’ responses<br />
to different questions or issues under <strong>the</strong>me-based head<strong>in</strong>gs. One of<br />
<strong>the</strong> dilemmas of report<strong>in</strong>g qualitative research is, however, that if<br />
<strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> research is to show <strong>the</strong> phenomenon <strong>in</strong> a holistic<br />
way, disaggregat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> data can weaken its essence.<br />
Should o<strong>the</strong>r researchers have access to <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
undertake secondary analysis? Be<strong>in</strong>g prepared to allow one’s<br />
29