Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad

Index
quantitative research 3; methods
6–8
questionnaires 49, 51, 130–1,
132–3
questions 57–8; circular 58;
clarificatory 58, 69; leading
115–16; lineal 58; reflexive 58
see also research questions
rapport 54–5, 66
readings, as feedback 173–5
recommendations 177–9, 180
referral source 71–2
reflexivity see self-reflection
relationships 46, 54, 113–15
reporting 29, 34, 158–60
reports, in public domain 30
research 4, 20, 27; associated
words 4; capacity for harm 31;
developmental 180–1; as
enlightenment 159; fraudulent
30; generalisability 17, 18, 180;
in human services 21–2, 23, 24,
47, 175, 188–9; impact 177, 181,
188; ownership of 22; and staff
evaluation 32, 46; as theatre
165–6; trade-offs 36;
transferability 180; within
organisations 31–4
Research Code of Ethics 24
research participants see
participants
research questions 3, 7, 8, 18;
conceptualising 12, 19;
generating 4–5, 8, 18, 63; see also
questions
research team 43–5
researcher 71–2; centrality of 8,
18, 46; as client 16; debriefing
61; flexibility 78; full-time 43,
44; honesty/integrity 32, 46;
perspective 20; role clarity
87–9; self-reflection 18, 46;
source of interference 32; as
whistle-blower 38
researcher-participant relationship
54, 73 see also power
researcher-practitioner split 5–6
risk of harm 27, 28, 37, 47
role clarity 78, 82, 87–9
sample size 17–18, 23, 52–4, 130
sampling 134–5; theoretical 52,
67–8
Sanders, Jackie xiii–xiv, 13, 43, 181;
research study xvii, 13, 43, 181
Scott, Dorothy xiv, 4, 8, 32;
research studies xvii–xviii, 14,
126–7, 180
secondary data analysis 29–30
self-disclosure 61
self-reflection 18, 46
service delivery 21
service providers 29; gaining
consent of 32; as researcher 25
social sciences 5–6
sociology 2, 74
staff, gaining consent of 32
staff evaluation 32, 46
stories 50–1, 55, 58, 59
subjectivity 131–2
tape recording 55, 59–60, 65
team coding 146–7
teamwork 43–5
terminology 19
The Ethnograph 148, 150, 152, 153,
154
‘The experience of childhood
sexual abuse’ xvii, 68, 146;
background to study 11–12;
interviewing style 68–70;
participants’ experience 57
‘The long goodbye: the experience
of placing and visiting long-term
partners in a nursing home’
xviii, 86, 138, 170; background to
study 16–17; choosing
observation 86–7; different
forms of presentation 170–1;
document analysis 151; impact
182–3; interviews: analysing
149–50; transcribing 148–9;
observation role 87–9;
observations: analysing 151;
recording 90–1; timing of
89–90; use of multiple methods
138–40
207