Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Epilogue violence, the things we emphasise in talks, the basic messages . . . too much of the intervention focuses on leaving and the assumption that this is the option you offer women and if they don’t want it, then that’s their problem, so it has very much shifted our questions and challenges to those who work in the field—there is a whole process before women are ready or able to leave, and too little of the intervention focuses on that. It has also been a challenge to the women’s services, who have traditionally provided refuge, which is again about leaving, and we have just written a review for the Home Office . . . about advocacy and outreach approaches and this study has informed that. And I have had feedback from practitioners that the bit that they found the most useful is part of the process analysis where ...we conceptualise domestic violence in terms of forms of power, positions of power. So there’s a part at the end that talks about institutional power, formal power, personal power and gender power and people have said that they find that really helpful in making sense of processes in projects and interagency groups. Robyn Munford and Jackie Sanders—Working successfully with families Jackie: I think that [our] research has been one of a number of contributions to the growing interest at a policy level in strengths-based work with families. I know that the research findings have been used in negotiations with funders of family services to help explain why certain funding approaches won’t work in practice and to argue for increased recognition in funding contracts for a ‘whole person’ or ‘whole family’ approach to funding. We have had lots of positive feedback from practitioners relating to the findings and the endorsement it gives to models of good practice. The materials are used in teaching both practice and research in universities and other tertiary institutions, both [in New Zealand] and in Australia, 185
Qualitative research in practice and we understand that there is interest in them in the United Kingdom as well. As researchers, we really want to make a contribution to family change—we can’t do that directly but we can do it by providing good information to practitioners, managers and policy-makers. From the outset we wanted to produce research that made sense to these people and that they could use, and this has driven our work and continues to drive it. We have always been aware that it is not enough just to do the research and hope that people will find it, so we are very active in circulating our materials and trying hard to make them accessible in as wide a range of settings as we possibly can. We have found people incredibly receptive to our work and that is really pleasing. We try to establish and maintain a dialogue with a wide range of users of our work to keep on hearing what it is they need in terms of information and how they need it delivered to them and then to incorporate that into the work we do. Dorothy Scott—Identification of post-partum depression Dorothy: In Chapter 1 I described how my research in the early 1980s with Victorian maternal and child health nurses grew out of my clinical work with women with post-partum psychiatric disorders. My initial goal of increasing the capacity of the maternal and child health service to identify and refer women to psychiatric services was broadened to explore the conditions under which the nurses might encompass maternal emotional and social well-being in their role. I would never have guessed that fifteen years later I would find myself on the steps of the Victorian Parliament with a megaphone in my hand, addressing a large crowd, mostly women pushing prams, demonstrating against government moves to restrict access to the maternal and child health service! In all of the intervening fifteen years, it never felt like I was taking the research down a predetermined pathway—rather 186
- Page 152 and 153: Mixing methods about 1200 organisat
- Page 154 and 155: Mixing methods Yvonne: that overarc
- Page 156 and 157: Mixing methods Yvonne: Cheryl: Yvon
- Page 158 and 159: Mixing methods reducing the benefit
- Page 160 and 161: Analysing data possible about what
- Page 162 and 163: Analysing data sometimes referred t
- Page 164 and 165: Analysing data Team research makes
- Page 166 and 167: Analysing data crying—and I could
- Page 168 and 169: Analysing data Analysing the observ
- Page 170 and 171: Analysing data I’d said that’,
- Page 172 and 173: Analysing data straight to the inte
- Page 174 and 175: Analysing data They also highlight
- Page 176 and 177: Presenting and writing up be used.
- Page 178 and 179: Presenting and writing up participa
- Page 180 and 181: Presenting and writing up the princ
- Page 182 and 183: Presenting and writing up difficult
- Page 184 and 185: Presenting and writing up adopted c
- Page 186 and 187: Presenting and writing up Yvonne: L
- Page 188 and 189: Presenting and writing up of the th
- Page 190 and 191: Presenting and writing up Tim: stor
- Page 192 and 193: Presenting and writing up Anne felt
- Page 194 and 195: 9 Epilogue: From research to practi
- Page 196 and 197: Epilogue are presented to the way i
- Page 198 and 199: Epilogue • Diffusion (disseminati
- Page 200 and 201: Epilogue practical and simple langu
- Page 204 and 205: Epilogue [it] was dragging me along
- Page 206 and 207: Epilogue through reporting the expe
- Page 208 and 209: References Beresford, B. 1997 Perso
- Page 210 and 211: References Darlington, Y., Osmond,
- Page 212 and 213: References Johnson, K. & Scott, D.
- Page 214 and 215: References ——1995 In-depth Inte
- Page 216 and 217: References ——1990 Writing Strat
- Page 218 and 219: References Tilse, C. 1994 ‘Long t
- Page 220 and 221: Index Page numbers in italics refer
- Page 222 and 223: Index ‘getting in/getting on/gett
- Page 224 and 225: Index quantitative research 3; meth
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
and we understand that <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom as well.<br />
As researchers, we really want to make a contribution<br />
to family change—we can’t do that directly but<br />
we can do it by provid<strong>in</strong>g good <strong>in</strong>formation to practitioners,<br />
managers and policy-makers. <strong>From</strong> <strong>the</strong> outset<br />
we wanted to produce research that made sense to<br />
<strong>the</strong>se people and that <strong>the</strong>y could use, and this has<br />
driven our work and cont<strong>in</strong>ues to drive it. We have<br />
always been aware that it is not enough just to do <strong>the</strong><br />
research and hope that people will f<strong>in</strong>d it, so we are<br />
very active <strong>in</strong> circulat<strong>in</strong>g our materials and try<strong>in</strong>g hard<br />
to make <strong>the</strong>m accessible <strong>in</strong> as wide a range of sett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
as we possibly can. We have found people <strong>in</strong>credibly<br />
receptive to our work and that is really pleas<strong>in</strong>g. We<br />
try to establish and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a dialogue with a wide<br />
range of users of our work to keep on hear<strong>in</strong>g what it<br />
is <strong>the</strong>y need <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>formation and how <strong>the</strong>y<br />
need it delivered to <strong>the</strong>m and <strong>the</strong>n to <strong>in</strong>corporate that<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> work we do.<br />
Dorothy Scott—Identification of post-partum depression<br />
Dorothy:<br />
In Chapter 1 I described how my research <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
early 1980s with Victorian maternal and child health<br />
nurses grew out of my cl<strong>in</strong>ical work with women<br />
with post-partum psychiatric disorders. My <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
goal of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> capacity of <strong>the</strong> maternal and<br />
child health service to identify and refer women to<br />
psychiatric services was broadened to explore <strong>the</strong><br />
conditions under which <strong>the</strong> nurses might encompass<br />
maternal emotional and social well-be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
role. I would never have guessed that fifteen years<br />
later I would f<strong>in</strong>d myself on <strong>the</strong> steps of <strong>the</strong> Victorian<br />
Parliament with a megaphone <strong>in</strong> my hand, address<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a large crowd, mostly women push<strong>in</strong>g prams, demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st government moves to restrict access to<br />
<strong>the</strong> maternal and child health service! In all of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g fifteen years, it never felt like I was tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> research down a predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed pathway—ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
186