Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Epilogue • Diffusion (disseminating information) • Adoption (implementing the program). Fraser and Leavitt (1990) use the US model of intensive family-based services, ‘Homebuilders’, as a case study of this type of research, which typically involves a large number of people and organisations. However, most research in the human services will not be part of such a linear strategic process, as some of the following stories illustrate well. Stories from the field We have selected quite a few of our stories to highlight the impact that qualitative research in the human services can have, both in the short term, sometimes commencing during the study itself, through to the long term. The first one we present is Anne Coleman’s study (2001), which was still in progress at the time we interviewed her. We were interested in finding out about the impact that research may have, even at such an early stage. This is followed with an excerpt from the interview with Cheryl Tilse. It picks up from the previous chapter and relates to reaching audiences beyond the research sites through conference presentations and media interviews (Tilse, 1996). Caroline Thomas then speaks briefly about the impact her adoption study has had in the year since its publication (Thomas, 1999), and how the political environment in which it was released gave it a special salience. Liz Kelly discusses how her study’s different conceptualisation of domestic violence intervention struck a chord with workers in the field of family violence (Kelly, 1999). Jackie Sanders also talks about how the research she has done with Robyn Munford has been used by a range of people, from students and practitioners to policy-makers and funding sources. We conclude with Dorothy Scott reflecting on the long-term outcomes of her research undertaken with maternal and child health nurses in the early 1980s (Scott, 1987a, 1987b, 1992). Anne Coleman—Five star motels Anne: Yes, I’ve quite a strong sense of [impact] now ...I’ve talked to a lot of people in the last ten years, in the 181
Qualitative research in practice bureaucracy, in homelessness services and in politics . . . and the sorts of things I’ve said are simply that it’s pointless to move people on. These are the spaces that capitalism has left for them. If you’re now going to tell them to leave these spaces, where will they go? And how do you expect that sort of response to be effective? But in the last twelve months, I now hear the local Councillor saying things like, ‘We will no longer move homeless people on from this area.’ Some people in Brisbane City Council—not necessarily the top levels—are starting to take on this idea of ‘Yes, that’s actually right. These are all the same people we’ve been moving on from these spaces for ten years and they’re still the same people so obviously this is not a very good way to go about it.’ So I know that in terms of the federal government response it’s pretty much unchanged, and I know that the long-term homeless people whom I’ve looked at in this research probably won’t be much better off, but I can see a shift at the local level; in terms of making life different for the people that I’m concerned about, where it will make a difference is at the local level. So ...I feel like it’s been a very useful piece of work already. Cheryl Tilse—The long goodbye Cheryl: I didn’t change the world. I think I had an impact on all of the facilities that I worked in, and I certainly spent the year after I’d written the thesis talking about the need to understand the perspectives of older spouses. I did a lot of that—I got invited to the annual general meeting of the Gerontology Association; I did a talk with staff at a hospital; and I did a talk for nurses in aged care facilities. So I targeted workers and . . . really I was saying these older spouses need a voice. I was trying to increase the understanding of the issues for them. I was trying to get to front-line workers rather than social workers or policy workers. I did some in-service training sessions for some church-run nursing homes where they brought in all their workers ...I wrote a report in 182
- Page 148 and 149: Mixing methods violence; that they
- Page 150 and 151: Mixing methods incredibly arrogant
- Page 152 and 153: Mixing methods about 1200 organisat
- Page 154 and 155: Mixing methods Yvonne: that overarc
- Page 156 and 157: Mixing methods Yvonne: Cheryl: Yvon
- Page 158 and 159: Mixing methods reducing the benefit
- Page 160 and 161: Analysing data possible about what
- Page 162 and 163: Analysing data sometimes referred t
- Page 164 and 165: Analysing data Team research makes
- Page 166 and 167: Analysing data crying—and I could
- Page 168 and 169: Analysing data Analysing the observ
- Page 170 and 171: Analysing data I’d said that’,
- Page 172 and 173: Analysing data straight to the inte
- Page 174 and 175: Analysing data They also highlight
- Page 176 and 177: Presenting and writing up be used.
- Page 178 and 179: Presenting and writing up participa
- Page 180 and 181: Presenting and writing up the princ
- Page 182 and 183: Presenting and writing up difficult
- Page 184 and 185: Presenting and writing up adopted c
- Page 186 and 187: Presenting and writing up Yvonne: L
- Page 188 and 189: Presenting and writing up of the th
- Page 190 and 191: Presenting and writing up Tim: stor
- Page 192 and 193: Presenting and writing up Anne felt
- Page 194 and 195: 9 Epilogue: From research to practi
- Page 196 and 197: Epilogue are presented to the way i
- Page 200 and 201: Epilogue practical and simple langu
- Page 202 and 203: Epilogue violence, the things we em
- Page 204 and 205: Epilogue [it] was dragging me along
- Page 206 and 207: Epilogue through reporting the expe
- Page 208 and 209: References Beresford, B. 1997 Perso
- Page 210 and 211: References Darlington, Y., Osmond,
- Page 212 and 213: References Johnson, K. & Scott, D.
- Page 214 and 215: References ——1995 In-depth Inte
- Page 216 and 217: References ——1990 Writing Strat
- Page 218 and 219: References Tilse, C. 1994 ‘Long t
- Page 220 and 221: Index Page numbers in italics refer
- Page 222 and 223: Index ‘getting in/getting on/gett
- Page 224 and 225: Index quantitative research 3; meth
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
bureaucracy, <strong>in</strong> homelessness services and <strong>in</strong> politics<br />
. . . and <strong>the</strong> sorts of th<strong>in</strong>gs I’ve said are simply that it’s<br />
po<strong>in</strong>tless to move people on. These are <strong>the</strong> spaces that<br />
capitalism has left for <strong>the</strong>m. If you’re now go<strong>in</strong>g to tell<br />
<strong>the</strong>m to leave <strong>the</strong>se spaces, where will <strong>the</strong>y go? And<br />
how do you expect that sort of response to be effective?<br />
But <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last twelve months, I now hear <strong>the</strong><br />
local Councillor say<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs like, ‘We will no longer<br />
move homeless people on from this area.’ Some<br />
people <strong>in</strong> Brisbane City Council—not necessarily <strong>the</strong><br />
top levels—are start<strong>in</strong>g to take on this idea of ‘Yes,<br />
that’s actually right. These are all <strong>the</strong> same people<br />
we’ve been mov<strong>in</strong>g on from <strong>the</strong>se spaces for ten years<br />
and <strong>the</strong>y’re still <strong>the</strong> same people so obviously this is<br />
not a very good way to go about it.’ So I know that <strong>in</strong><br />
terms of <strong>the</strong> federal government response it’s pretty<br />
much unchanged, and I know that <strong>the</strong> long-term<br />
homeless people whom I’ve looked at <strong>in</strong> this research<br />
probably won’t be much better off, but I can see a shift<br />
at <strong>the</strong> local level; <strong>in</strong> terms of mak<strong>in</strong>g life different for<br />
<strong>the</strong> people that I’m concerned about, where it will<br />
make a difference is at <strong>the</strong> local level. So ...I feel like<br />
it’s been a very useful piece of work already.<br />
Cheryl Tilse—The long goodbye<br />
Cheryl:<br />
I didn’t change <strong>the</strong> world. I th<strong>in</strong>k I had an impact on all<br />
of <strong>the</strong> facilities that I worked <strong>in</strong>, and I certa<strong>in</strong>ly spent <strong>the</strong><br />
year after I’d written <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis talk<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> need to<br />
understand <strong>the</strong> perspectives of older spouses. I did a lot<br />
of that—I got <strong>in</strong>vited to <strong>the</strong> annual general meet<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Gerontology Association; I did a talk with staff at a<br />
hospital; and I did a talk for nurses <strong>in</strong> aged care facilities.<br />
So I targeted workers and . . . really I was say<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>se older spouses need a voice. I was try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> issues for <strong>the</strong>m. I was<br />
try<strong>in</strong>g to get to front-l<strong>in</strong>e workers ra<strong>the</strong>r than social<br />
workers or policy workers. I did some <strong>in</strong>-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
sessions for some church-run nurs<strong>in</strong>g homes where<br />
<strong>the</strong>y brought <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong>ir workers ...I wrote a report <strong>in</strong><br />
182