Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
In <strong>in</strong>dustry this process is called ‘technology transfer’ but <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to <strong>the</strong> human services <strong>the</strong> term does not give sufficient<br />
salience to <strong>the</strong> contextual features which need to be considered. We<br />
prefer to describe it as a process of transplant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation across<br />
different landscapes. The metaphor of tak<strong>in</strong>g a plant from <strong>the</strong><br />
climatic and soil conditions <strong>in</strong> which it orig<strong>in</strong>ally grew and try<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to grow it elsewhere draws awareness to <strong>the</strong> different contextual<br />
characteristics which must be considered if <strong>the</strong> transplant is to be<br />
successful. The researcher will need to th<strong>in</strong>k carefully about what<br />
needs to be changed to make <strong>the</strong> program or policy fit <strong>the</strong> context<br />
<strong>in</strong>to which it is be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>troduced, while be<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>dful of <strong>the</strong> risk of<br />
damag<strong>in</strong>g what might be <strong>the</strong> core <strong>in</strong>gredients which make a<br />
program work.<br />
There is obviously a trade-off between ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrity<br />
of a model and adapt<strong>in</strong>g it to fit new contexts. In Dorothy Scott’s<br />
child protection assessment study (outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2), <strong>the</strong><br />
conflict between various organisations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> child protection<br />
system was particularly <strong>in</strong>tense dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period of data collection.<br />
This was precisely why <strong>the</strong> study <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong>ter-organisational<br />
and <strong>in</strong>ter-professional conflict—but by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> research was<br />
completed, <strong>the</strong> highly politicised controversies surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
child protection system had dim<strong>in</strong>ished. The question <strong>the</strong>n arose as<br />
to how applicable <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and recommendations were <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to <strong>the</strong> new context.<br />
Thus <strong>the</strong> generalisability and transferability of research are <strong>in</strong><br />
direct proportion to <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are contextbound.<br />
This is true for both quantitative and qualitative research. In<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g recommendations researchers need to acknowledge <strong>the</strong><br />
possible limitations on <strong>the</strong> transferability of <strong>the</strong>ir studies, while not<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong> study’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to o<strong>the</strong>r sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
The researcher’s role may go beyond dissem<strong>in</strong>ation and mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recommendations. Some human services researchers are actively<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a strategic process of developmental research which<br />
Fraser and Leavitt (1990) have described as ‘mission-oriented<br />
research and entrepreneurship’. In developmental research of this<br />
nature <strong>the</strong> evaluation is just one part of <strong>the</strong> process described by<br />
Thomas (1978) as consist<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g phases:<br />
• Analysis (identification of need)<br />
• Development (design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> social technology)<br />
• Evaluation (assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> program)<br />
180