Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Present<strong>in</strong>g and writ<strong>in</strong>g up<br />
<strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipals of middle-class schools, and all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
of relations and school types created by cross-classify<strong>in</strong>g relation and<br />
class ...Ei<strong>the</strong>r way, I would report <strong>the</strong> same results (although <strong>in</strong> a<br />
different order) and arrive at essentially <strong>the</strong> same conclusions (though<br />
<strong>the</strong> terms <strong>the</strong>y were put <strong>in</strong> and <strong>the</strong>ir emphases would differ). What I<br />
said about <strong>the</strong> implications for social science <strong>the</strong>ory and social policy<br />
would differ, naturally. If I used my results to answer different<br />
questions, <strong>the</strong> answers would look different. But none of that would<br />
affect <strong>the</strong> work that lay immediately ahead of me as I began writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
my <strong>the</strong>sis. Why worry about it? (Becker, 1986, p. 58).<br />
While quantitative studies lend <strong>the</strong>mselves more naturally to <strong>the</strong><br />
succ<strong>in</strong>ct presentation of results and discussion of relevant f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
<strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction can be less clear-cut <strong>in</strong> qualitative research, where<br />
description and <strong>in</strong>terpretation are more closely <strong>in</strong>terwoven. We have<br />
found it helpful to divide a report <strong>in</strong>to major topic areas and to<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude a separate discussion section with<strong>in</strong> each, after <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic<br />
description. In this way, <strong>the</strong> author’s <strong>in</strong>terpretation does not become<br />
too <strong>in</strong>term<strong>in</strong>gled with <strong>the</strong> voices of <strong>the</strong> research participants, but<br />
occurs close enough to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic analysis to allow <strong>the</strong> reader to<br />
see how it has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted. Whatever choice is made, it is<br />
important to be clear about who is talk<strong>in</strong>g at any po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />
We have been talk<strong>in</strong>g particularly about qualitative studies that<br />
focus closely on participants’ accounts and draw <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terpretations<br />
from <strong>the</strong> data, develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ory us<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>ductive logic.<br />
These comments are less applicable to <strong>the</strong>ory test<strong>in</strong>g studies. The<br />
latter tend to be more conceptually driven than data driven and <strong>the</strong><br />
k<strong>in</strong>ds of writ<strong>in</strong>g-up issues we have been address<strong>in</strong>g often do not<br />
arise—<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory be<strong>in</strong>g tested, or <strong>the</strong> conceptual framework driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> study, also provides <strong>the</strong> structure for <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
In writ<strong>in</strong>g up qualitative research it is not always immediately<br />
obvious what tense should be used for <strong>the</strong> various parts of <strong>the</strong><br />
report. This is especially so <strong>in</strong> studies which <strong>in</strong>clude direct quotes<br />
from participants, where <strong>the</strong> primary <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation will often be to<br />
present <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> as immediate a way as possible. Wolcott provides<br />
useful advice, however, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> suggestion to write descriptive<br />
passages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past tense right from <strong>the</strong> start, even if this seems<br />
odd or even disrespectful to participants you may still be work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with or whose reported experiences are still vividly <strong>in</strong> your m<strong>in</strong>d—<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ly one works with <strong>the</strong>ir words for a long time through <strong>the</strong><br />
analysis and writ<strong>in</strong>g up processes. He says:<br />
163