Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6<br />
Mix<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />
‘Mixed methods’ is, <strong>in</strong> social science research, a shorthand way of<br />
say<strong>in</strong>g that a study has comb<strong>in</strong>ed qualitative and quantitative<br />
methods of data analysis. In this chapter we discuss studies that<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>se methods <strong>in</strong> four common ways.<br />
Mix<strong>in</strong>g methods has been <strong>the</strong> subject of considerable debate <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> social sciences and has variously been regarded as ana<strong>the</strong>ma, as<br />
<strong>the</strong> outcome of everyday pragmatic research decisions, or as appropriate<br />
<strong>in</strong> some situations but need<strong>in</strong>g to be carefully justified.<br />
Greene, Caracelli and Graham (1989) identify three positions: <strong>the</strong><br />
purists, <strong>the</strong> pragmatists and those tak<strong>in</strong>g a middle-ground, situationalist<br />
approach. At <strong>the</strong> one extreme are <strong>the</strong> purists, those who<br />
regard qualitative and quantitative methods as represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
compet<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>compatible paradigms, and for whom mix<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
not tenable (Rist, 1977; Guba 1985; Smith & Heshusius, 1986; Guba<br />
& L<strong>in</strong>coln, 1989). Guba (1985) says, ‘We are deal<strong>in</strong>g with an ei<strong>the</strong>ror<br />
proposition, <strong>in</strong> which one must pledge allegiance to one<br />
paradigm or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>the</strong>re is no compromise’ (1985, p. 80).<br />
The situationalists adhere to <strong>the</strong> notion of separate paradigms<br />
but value <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased understand<strong>in</strong>g that can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g aspects of social life from different perspectives (Filstead,<br />
1979; Kidder & F<strong>in</strong>e, 1987; Oakley, 1999). Kidder and F<strong>in</strong>e say, ‘We<br />
share <strong>the</strong> call for “syn<strong>the</strong>sis”, but at <strong>the</strong> same time, we want to<br />
preserve <strong>the</strong> significant differences between <strong>the</strong> two cultures.<br />
Instead of homogeniz<strong>in</strong>g research methods and cultures, we would<br />
like to see researchers become bicultural’ (1987, p. 57). Similarly,<br />
119