Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad

Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad

blogs.unpad.ac.id
from blogs.unpad.ac.id More from this publisher
16.11.2014 Views

Tailoring data collection Dorothy: Caroline: scale. We already knew that. What we didn’t know was what they thought about what they had been through and what they remembered about it. That was what we really wanted to get at and focus upon. So you really had to justify to others the choice of indepth interviewing as the method? Yes. What also concerned us was . . . we had a certain budget which only allowed us to visit the children once and we were anxious about the amount of interview time [involved] in using a battery of tests. Had we included tests, the interviews would have been a wholly different experience for the children and I think that that has definitely been borne out by other work I’ve done subsequently that has involved psychometric testing. I think we have to be extremely careful about what we put children through in the interview process. It’s not just about the level of intrusion—it’s about the length of time that interviews can take and the need to relate that to children’s capacity to concentrate and stay with what they’re talking about ...On average, we were with the children speaking about their experiences of adoption for about an hour and a half, and that seemed quite long enough. Recruiting and engaging the children Dorothy: Caroline: Can you say a little bit about the process of the research? Thinking of moving through the recruitment and engagement and finally the interviewing, how you found yourself adapting this because the research participants were children—can you say a little bit about your own thinking and how that unfolded? In the recruitment process what was absolutely key to Verna and to me was that it was the children we needed, but to get to them we had to get past their gatekeepers—their adoptive parents. We had to convince them of the worth of all that we were doing. But we also wanted to be sure that the children wanted to speak to us at the outset. It was absolutely 109

Qualitative research in practice crucial to us that we didn’t pressure them and that we were giving them as much information as possible about us and the study. We wanted them to be clear about what we were expecting from them. The challenge there was to try to communicate that to them in one opportunity. But we also had to produce material that was going to appeal and make sense to a huge range of different children ...That was the big challenge there. And, for instance, we thought about whether we needed to produce different materials for different ages, whether we needed different materials for boys and girls, and whether we needed to try to make them culturally sensitive. We did go through all those options, but finally came up with something that we were confident in, once we tested it out with other children who were about the same age and who were imagining themselves into the situation of the children who would be receiving the materials. They gave us the reassurance we needed that the materials we’d produced would be acceptable. The interviews Dorothy: Caroline: You’ve written about adapting the interviewing [for each child], individualising the interviewing really to be able to engage and reach this child, rather than doing it in a standardised way. Is there anything that you would add to that? Possibly the book doesn’t convey the differences in those individual interviews. I mean, from speaking to a 13- or 14-year-old girl who was extremely comfortable just talking to me and very relaxed and articulate—we could have gone on talking for much longer than two hours—to a little boy who was literally ‘all over the place’, physically and mentally. With him at one point I ended up playing Bagatelle in the middle of the interview. Then we went out into the garden and walked around the garden and played football for a little while before coming back and doing a little bit more of the interview. It was sometimes important to 110

<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />

crucial to us that we didn’t pressure <strong>the</strong>m and that we<br />

were giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m as much <strong>in</strong>formation as possible<br />

about us and <strong>the</strong> study. We wanted <strong>the</strong>m to be clear<br />

about what we were expect<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong>m. The challenge<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was to try to communicate that to <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong><br />

one opportunity. But we also had to produce material<br />

that was go<strong>in</strong>g to appeal and make sense to a huge<br />

range of different children ...That was <strong>the</strong> big challenge<br />

<strong>the</strong>re. And, for <strong>in</strong>stance, we thought about<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r we needed to produce different materials for<br />

different ages, whe<strong>the</strong>r we needed different materials<br />

for boys and girls, and whe<strong>the</strong>r we needed to try to<br />

make <strong>the</strong>m culturally sensitive. We did go through all<br />

those options, but f<strong>in</strong>ally came up with someth<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

we were confident <strong>in</strong>, once we tested it out with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

children who were about <strong>the</strong> same age and who were<br />

imag<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> situation of <strong>the</strong> children<br />

who would be receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> materials. They gave us<br />

<strong>the</strong> reassurance we needed that <strong>the</strong> materials we’d<br />

produced would be acceptable.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

Dorothy:<br />

Carol<strong>in</strong>e:<br />

You’ve written about adapt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g [for<br />

each child], <strong>in</strong>dividualis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g really to<br />

be able to engage and reach this child, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> a standardised way. Is <strong>the</strong>re anyth<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

you would add to that?<br />

Possibly <strong>the</strong> book doesn’t convey <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong><br />

those <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>terviews. I mean, from speak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to a 13- or 14-year-old girl who was extremely comfortable<br />

just talk<strong>in</strong>g to me and very relaxed and<br />

articulate—we could have gone on talk<strong>in</strong>g for much<br />

longer than two hours—to a little boy who was literally<br />

‘all over <strong>the</strong> place’, physically and mentally. With him<br />

at one po<strong>in</strong>t I ended up play<strong>in</strong>g Bagatelle <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview. Then we went out <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> garden and<br />

walked around <strong>the</strong> garden and played football for a<br />

little while before com<strong>in</strong>g back and do<strong>in</strong>g a little bit<br />

more of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview. It was sometimes important to<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!