Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews (such as ask<strong>in</strong>g children to make up a story or<br />
draw a scene, or to play ‘let’s pretend’). Similarly, Backett and<br />
Alexander suggest, ‘Keep <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews open, flexible and structured<br />
around <strong>the</strong> daily experiences of <strong>the</strong> child’ (1991, p. 35).<br />
Whatever choices are made about how to <strong>in</strong>terview children,<br />
contextual issues should be discussed thoroughly and transparently<br />
<strong>in</strong> reports on <strong>the</strong> research. This <strong>in</strong>cludes anyth<strong>in</strong>g about<br />
<strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> research was conducted that could have affected <strong>the</strong><br />
children’s responses or performance, such as <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews,<br />
<strong>the</strong> venue, <strong>the</strong> activities, what choices <strong>the</strong> children had, or<br />
who else was present.<br />
Siegert (1986) raises some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g issues <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong><br />
process of <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g children and <strong>the</strong> nature and quality of data<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In discuss<strong>in</strong>g research on children’s social competence, he<br />
argues that an <strong>in</strong>terview between an adult and a child can legitimately<br />
tell us a lot about children’s competences <strong>in</strong> adult–child<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction, <strong>in</strong> contexts def<strong>in</strong>ed by adults, but it is questionable<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r that can be generalised to o<strong>the</strong>r contexts, for example with<br />
peers. Siegert suggests that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of participant observation<br />
and group discussions among children would be more appropriate<br />
ways to ga<strong>the</strong>r data about peer <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />
In research on children’s perspectives, it is important to take <strong>the</strong><br />
lead from <strong>the</strong> child as to what <strong>the</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g enough to talk<br />
about (Beresford, 1997). This avoids mak<strong>in</strong>g assumptions about<br />
what <strong>the</strong> researcher th<strong>in</strong>ks might be most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and relevant to<br />
<strong>the</strong>m or hold<strong>in</strong>g too firmly on to one’s own topic list of what seems<br />
to be important. Beresford also suggests tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> time to establish<br />
<strong>the</strong> words and phrases used by <strong>the</strong> child at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terview and us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> child’s language.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> context of child abuse <strong>in</strong>vestigations, Steward, Bussey,<br />
Goodman and Saywitz suggest that <strong>in</strong> order to maximise children’s<br />
communication:<br />
The <strong>in</strong>terviewer should listen to <strong>the</strong> child’s narrative report, not only<br />
for <strong>the</strong> content, but also for <strong>the</strong> child’s spontaneous use of language.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>terviewer should <strong>the</strong>n match his/her own sentence length and<br />
complexity to <strong>the</strong> child’s <strong>in</strong> order to maximize <strong>the</strong> communication.<br />
Interviewers can assume that <strong>the</strong> younger <strong>the</strong> child, <strong>the</strong> shorter <strong>the</strong><br />
sentences <strong>the</strong> child will comprehend, <strong>the</strong> fewer verb-noun units per<br />
utterance, <strong>the</strong> fewer syllables per word and <strong>the</strong> more <strong>the</strong>y will<br />
depend on familiar contextual cues to glean mean<strong>in</strong>g (Steward et al.,<br />
1993, pp. 32–3).<br />
98