Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Tailoring data collection The experiences of researchers who have worked with children are presented here as a guide to some approaches that may be useful, not as recipes for how to work with children. In the final analysis, the ‘best’ thing to do has to be worked out in the context of the individual relationships between the researcher and each child. There are, however, a couple of overriding principles in working with children, in any context. These are the importance of neither over-estimating nor under-estimating a child’s capabilities, and the necessity to like children, to be comfortable with them, to be really interested in what they think and feel, and to be able to communicate this to them. Interviewing children In this section, we consider first the issue of deciding who to interview and in what order. This is important in studies where other family members are also being interviewed. We then consider some practical issues relating to the interview context itself. Who to interview and in what order? In research with children there will always be adults whose cooperation and trust, as well as formal consent, is crucial to the child’s participation in the research. Very often, others who are significant in the child’s life will also be interviewed. Researchers have taken a number of approaches to deciding the order in which interviews are conducted, or whether to interview children alone or with others. There is no right or wrong approach. All have pros and cons, and these are decisions that need to be made in the context of the research purpose and the setting in which it is being conducted. In general, where parents and children are being interviewed, interviewing parents first gives them an opportunity to get to know the interviewer and also to develop a clear idea of what the interviews involve. In all cases, parents should be informed as to the nature of the children’s interviews, and any techniques that will be used. It is also vital that they understand the importance of not influencing what the children say, both prior to the initial interview and before any subsequent interviews. 95
Qualitative research in practice Interviewing the parents first may also alert the interviewer to any indicators that children may later be exposed to pressure by a parent to disclose what they said in an interview. This may be especially so in research on sensitive topics such as separation or divorce; at times a decision may have to be made as to whether or not to proceed with a child’s interview. In a study on contact after divorce in which both parents and at least one child were interviewed, Trinder, Beek and Connolly (2001) used separate interviewers for each member of the family. All the children’s interviews were conducted by a social worker experienced in working with children and others on the team alternated between interviewing mothers and fathers. While this approach would not prevent a parent intent on asking children what they had said from doing so, it at least established a sense of the importance of each having their own say, separate from what others might have said. Interviewing parents and children together may help deal with parents’ concerns about what is being asked of children, but may pose other difficulties. Hood, Kelley and Mayall (1996; see also Mayall, 1999) found the presence of adults at times altered the behaviour of all concerned—the interviewer, the child and the parent. Very often the interviews ended up largely as exchanges between the adults, even though the child’s perspective was the major focus of the research. Analysis of transcripts revealed interviewers deferring to and siding with parents’ views, interviewers keeping firmly to their own research agenda rather than taking the time to follow the child’s view, parents interrupting and speaking for children, children struggling to be heard among the adult voices, children deferring to adults’ views, and children presenting a united front, with parents, in relation to any questioning about intergenerational issues within the family. The interview As with any interview situation, the context of an interview with a child will shape the interaction. Children need an emotionally supportive environment if they are to feel comfortable enough to participate in an interview. It is important to take the time to develop a friendly and informal relationship with the child, and to make the interview context as child-focused as possible. This can 96
- Page 62 and 63: Ethics and organisations Dorothy: R
- Page 64 and 65: Ethics and organisations can only e
- Page 66 and 67: In-depth interviewing them or not m
- Page 68 and 69: In-depth interviewing Stories give
- Page 70 and 71: In-depth interviewing experience of
- Page 72 and 73: In-depth interviewing There is a re
- Page 74 and 75: In-depth interviewing data sought,
- Page 76 and 77: In-depth interviewing interview. Th
- Page 78 and 79: In-depth interviewing Generally, th
- Page 80 and 81: In-depth interviewing in-depth inte
- Page 82 and 83: In-depth interviewing Yvonne: So a
- Page 84 and 85: In-depth interviewing Sampling Yvon
- Page 86 and 87: In-depth interviewing much they tal
- Page 88 and 89: In-depth interviewing encouraged mu
- Page 90 and 91: In-depth interviewing contact, the
- Page 92 and 93: Observation Choosing observation Li
- Page 94 and 95: Observation The observation process
- Page 96 and 97: Observation When to observe and for
- Page 98 and 99: Observation Anne Coleman—Five sta
- Page 100 and 101: Observation Yvonne: Anne: Yvonne: A
- Page 102 and 103: Observation Anne: Another useful th
- Page 104 and 105: Observation couldn’t understand h
- Page 106 and 107: Observation interesting because I s
- Page 108 and 109: Observation of questions separate f
- Page 110 and 111: Tailoring data collection We focus
- Page 114 and 115: Tailoring data collection be achiev
- Page 116 and 117: Tailoring data collection Making us
- Page 118 and 119: Tailoring data collection children
- Page 120 and 121: Tailoring data collection collectio
- Page 122 and 123: Tailoring data collection • Settl
- Page 124 and 125: Tailoring data collection Caroline
- Page 126 and 127: Tailoring data collection Dorothy:
- Page 128 and 129: Tailoring data collection Dorothy:
- Page 130 and 131: Tailoring data collection Tim: real
- Page 132 and 133: Tailoring data collection supermark
- Page 134 and 135: Tailoring data collection Wendy: th
- Page 136 and 137: 6 Mixing methods ‘Mixed methods
- Page 138 and 139: Mixing methods the different compon
- Page 140 and 141: Mixing methods methods which allowe
- Page 142 and 143: Mixing methods obtained through one
- Page 144 and 145: Mixing methods in itself. Rather, t
- Page 146 and 147: Mixing methods and how they would e
- Page 148 and 149: Mixing methods violence; that they
- Page 150 and 151: Mixing methods incredibly arrogant
- Page 152 and 153: Mixing methods about 1200 organisat
- Page 154 and 155: Mixing methods Yvonne: that overarc
- Page 156 and 157: Mixing methods Yvonne: Cheryl: Yvon
- Page 158 and 159: Mixing methods reducing the benefit
- Page 160 and 161: Analysing data possible about what
Tailor<strong>in</strong>g data collection<br />
The experiences of researchers who have worked with children<br />
are presented here as a guide to some approaches that may be<br />
useful, not as recipes for how to work with children. In <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
analysis, <strong>the</strong> ‘best’ th<strong>in</strong>g to do has to be worked out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual relationships between <strong>the</strong> researcher and each<br />
child. There are, however, a couple of overrid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong><br />
work<strong>in</strong>g with children, <strong>in</strong> any context. These are <strong>the</strong> importance of<br />
nei<strong>the</strong>r over-estimat<strong>in</strong>g nor under-estimat<strong>in</strong>g a child’s capabilities,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> necessity to like children, to be comfortable with <strong>the</strong>m, to be<br />
really <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> what <strong>the</strong>y th<strong>in</strong>k and feel, and to be able to<br />
communicate this to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Interview<strong>in</strong>g children<br />
In this section, we consider first <strong>the</strong> issue of decid<strong>in</strong>g who to <strong>in</strong>terview<br />
and <strong>in</strong> what order. This is important <strong>in</strong> studies where o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
family members are also be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviewed. We <strong>the</strong>n consider some<br />
practical issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview context itself.<br />
Who to <strong>in</strong>terview and <strong>in</strong> what order?<br />
In research with children <strong>the</strong>re will always be adults whose cooperation<br />
and trust, as well as formal consent, is crucial to <strong>the</strong><br />
child’s participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research. Very often, o<strong>the</strong>rs who are<br />
significant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> child’s life will also be <strong>in</strong>terviewed. <strong>Research</strong>ers<br />
have taken a number of approaches to decid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> order <strong>in</strong> which<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviews are conducted, or whe<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>in</strong>terview children alone<br />
or with o<strong>the</strong>rs. There is no right or wrong approach. All have pros<br />
and cons, and <strong>the</strong>se are decisions that need to be made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
context of <strong>the</strong> research purpose and <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> which it is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
conducted.<br />
In general, where parents and children are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviewed,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g parents first gives <strong>the</strong>m an opportunity to get to know<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewer and also to develop a clear idea of what <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
<strong>in</strong>volve. In all cases, parents should be <strong>in</strong>formed as to <strong>the</strong><br />
nature of <strong>the</strong> children’s <strong>in</strong>terviews, and any techniques that will be<br />
used. It is also vital that <strong>the</strong>y understand <strong>the</strong> importance of not<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong> children say, both prior to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terview<br />
and before any subsequent <strong>in</strong>terviews.<br />
95