Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
south, entry and stairs to the east and contains a solid roller door to the west). The northern<br />
elevation contains two windows <strong>of</strong> approximately 3sqm each, equating to approximately 21% <strong>of</strong><br />
the overall surface area <strong>of</strong> the northern wall as visible from Lake Monger Drive.<br />
The applicant states that the garage complies with the allowable setback <strong>of</strong> 3.0 metres from the<br />
front boundary as it is at right angles to the street alignment. This is a provision <strong>of</strong> the R-Codes,<br />
and not the <strong>Town</strong>'s Planning Policy, which overrides the provisions <strong>of</strong> the R-Codes. A 6.0 metre<br />
setback is required.<br />
The garage is 9.9 metres in length which is substantial when a minimum internal dimension <strong>of</strong><br />
5.4 metres is required. This provides a significant structure as seen from the street, and<br />
accounts for 50% <strong>of</strong> the front boundary. The garage is dominant and is considered to<br />
contribute negatively to the streetscape.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>'s Policy Manual is to ensure that garages, carports and other structures do<br />
not detract from the dominant elements <strong>of</strong> houses and landscape within the streetscape and to<br />
maintain an openness <strong>of</strong> streetscapes. The 'as built' garage is completely contrary to this aim.<br />
Overall, it is considered that setback <strong>of</strong> the garage from the front boundary does not address<br />
the performance criteria for the following reason:-<br />
<br />
the proposed setback <strong>of</strong> the garage detracts from the streetscape.<br />
POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessed<br />
against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme<br />
No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />
STRATEGIC DIRECTION:<br />
Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for the<br />
priority area 'Planning for our Community'.<br />
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION:<br />
This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirements for<br />
consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme.<br />
ATTACHMENTS:<br />
Nil.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Meeting 20 December 2011<br />
During discussion, Cr King suggested that the item be deferred to enable the applicant to<br />
modify the plans to include open grilles on the garage windows facing Lake Monger Drive.<br />
Moved by Cr King, seconded by Cr Grinceri<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 95