16.11.2014 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />

south, entry and stairs to the east and contains a solid roller door to the west). The northern<br />

elevation contains two windows <strong>of</strong> approximately 3sqm each, equating to approximately 21% <strong>of</strong><br />

the overall surface area <strong>of</strong> the northern wall as visible from Lake Monger Drive.<br />

The applicant states that the garage complies with the allowable setback <strong>of</strong> 3.0 metres from the<br />

front boundary as it is at right angles to the street alignment. This is a provision <strong>of</strong> the R-Codes,<br />

and not the <strong>Town</strong>'s Planning Policy, which overrides the provisions <strong>of</strong> the R-Codes. A 6.0 metre<br />

setback is required.<br />

The garage is 9.9 metres in length which is substantial when a minimum internal dimension <strong>of</strong><br />

5.4 metres is required. This provides a significant structure as seen from the street, and<br />

accounts for 50% <strong>of</strong> the front boundary. The garage is dominant and is considered to<br />

contribute negatively to the streetscape.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>'s Policy Manual is to ensure that garages, carports and other structures do<br />

not detract from the dominant elements <strong>of</strong> houses and landscape within the streetscape and to<br />

maintain an openness <strong>of</strong> streetscapes. The 'as built' garage is completely contrary to this aim.<br />

Overall, it is considered that setback <strong>of</strong> the garage from the front boundary does not address<br />

the performance criteria for the following reason:-<br />

<br />

the proposed setback <strong>of</strong> the garage detracts from the streetscape.<br />

POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />

There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessed<br />

against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme<br />

No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />

There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />

STRATEGIC DIRECTION:<br />

Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for the<br />

priority area 'Planning for our Community'.<br />

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION:<br />

This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirements for<br />

consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme.<br />

ATTACHMENTS:<br />

Nil.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Meeting 20 December 2011<br />

During discussion, Cr King suggested that the item be deferred to enable the applicant to<br />

modify the plans to include open grilles on the garage windows facing Lake Monger Drive.<br />

Moved by Cr King, seconded by Cr Grinceri<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!