Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
Development description<br />
The application proposes amendments to the original Planning Approval (dated 3 August 2009),<br />
these include:-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A garage roller door added to the western side;<br />
Windows located 800mm from the garage floor level;<br />
Bricking up <strong>of</strong> previously approved openings; and<br />
Dense landscaping between the garage and front fence<br />
Applicant's submission<br />
The applicant has provided the following justification for the front setback variation:-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The carport will attract an increase in criminal activity as a result <strong>of</strong> high degree <strong>of</strong> visibility<br />
generated from its intent.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>s imposition <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> a greater degree <strong>of</strong> openness as outlined on the<br />
planning approval serves only to achieve a planning outcome that is not relevant to the<br />
specific nature <strong>of</strong> the site, its topography context and history and in that regard cannot be<br />
relied upon to claim cause to create adverse impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the streetscape.<br />
There are concerns with security and safety to their amenity and they seek to have this<br />
concern alleviated by maintaining as closed and as solid a structure as possible;<br />
We believe that valid arguments for a more solid and robust structure that addresses the<br />
street in a solid and robust manner without compromise to the streetscape can be made<br />
given the unique nature <strong>of</strong> this particular precinct.<br />
Assessment against the performance criteria<br />
Setback <strong>of</strong> Garages and Carports<br />
Setback <strong>of</strong> garage from front<br />
boundary<br />
Proposed<br />
Acceptable development provision<br />
3.0 metres 6.0 metres<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
The setting back <strong>of</strong> carports and garages so as not to detract from the streetscape or appearance <strong>of</strong><br />
dwellings, or obstruct views <strong>of</strong> dwellings from the street and vice versa.<br />
The applicant has submitted an application for retrospective approval for the 'as built' 'carport'.<br />
Although the applicant has defined this structure as a carport, under the R-Codes as:-<br />
A ro<strong>of</strong>ed structure designed to accommodate one or more motor vehicles<br />
unenclosed except to the extent that it abuts a dwelling or a property boundary<br />
on one side, and being without a door unless that door is visually permeable.<br />
A garage is defined as:-<br />
Any ro<strong>of</strong>ed structure, other than a carport, designed to accommodate one or<br />
more motor vehicles attached to the dwelling.<br />
The structure therefore does not fit the definition <strong>of</strong> a carport, and is enclosed on three sides,<br />
with a garage door on the fourth side (the garage abuts a limestone retaining wall and lift to the<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 94