Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
boundary<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so in order to:<br />
make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />
enhance privacy; or<br />
otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />
not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />
ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong> adjoining<br />
properties is not restricted.<br />
The parapet walls to the living, laundry and bar will be to the western boundary and will have<br />
little impact on overshadowing as the shadow will be cast to the property to the north. The<br />
parapet wall to the garage is at a maximum height <strong>of</strong> a boundary fence. The parapet walls make<br />
effective use <strong>of</strong> the space on a narrow lot, and are located a minimum <strong>of</strong> 11.5 metres from the<br />
front boundary, therefore having little impact on the streetscape.<br />
These rooms are non habitable and do not contain major openings which overlook the adjoining<br />
property to the south, therefore not affecting visual privacy to the adjoining property. Although<br />
the adjoining owner has objected with regards to overshadowing to the outdoor living area it is<br />
considered that this area, will still have access to the winter sun and is mostly shaded by<br />
extensive tree coverage.<br />
Overall, it is considered that the buildings on the boundary address the performance criteria for<br />
the following reasons:-<br />
<br />
<br />
they make effective use <strong>of</strong> the space on a narrow lot; and<br />
they will have little affect on sunlight or ventilation to the adjoining property to the west.<br />
Building Height<br />
Maximum wall height to the<br />
underside <strong>of</strong> the eaves for pitched<br />
ro<strong>of</strong><br />
Maximum wall height for<br />
flat/concealed ro<strong>of</strong><br />
Acceptable development provision Proposed<br />
6.0 metres 5.2 metres - 6.9 metres<br />
7.0 metres 7.4 metres<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
Building height consistent with the desired height <strong>of</strong> buildings in the locality, and to recognise the need to<br />
protect the amenities <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties, including, where appropriate:<br />
adequate direct sun to buildings and appurtenant open spaces;<br />
adequate daylight to major openings to habitable rooms; and<br />
access to views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
Due to the slope <strong>of</strong> the land and the provision <strong>of</strong> an undercr<strong>of</strong>t garage, the proposed dwelling<br />
exceeds the maximum permissible height to the front. The applicant has reduced the ceiling<br />
heights and floor levels to try to reduce the overall height. The majority <strong>of</strong> the over height<br />
section is adjoining the property to the east who have expressed that they have no objections to<br />
the proposed application.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 78