16.11.2014 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />

boundary<br />

Performance criteria:<br />

Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so in order to:<br />

make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />

enhance privacy; or<br />

otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />

not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />

ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong> adjoining<br />

properties is not restricted.<br />

The parapet walls to the living, laundry and bar will be to the western boundary and will have<br />

little impact on overshadowing as the shadow will be cast to the property to the north. The<br />

parapet wall to the garage is at a maximum height <strong>of</strong> a boundary fence. The parapet walls make<br />

effective use <strong>of</strong> the space on a narrow lot, and are located a minimum <strong>of</strong> 11.5 metres from the<br />

front boundary, therefore having little impact on the streetscape.<br />

These rooms are non habitable and do not contain major openings which overlook the adjoining<br />

property to the south, therefore not affecting visual privacy to the adjoining property. Although<br />

the adjoining owner has objected with regards to overshadowing to the outdoor living area it is<br />

considered that this area, will still have access to the winter sun and is mostly shaded by<br />

extensive tree coverage.<br />

Overall, it is considered that the buildings on the boundary address the performance criteria for<br />

the following reasons:-<br />

<br />

<br />

they make effective use <strong>of</strong> the space on a narrow lot; and<br />

they will have little affect on sunlight or ventilation to the adjoining property to the west.<br />

Building Height<br />

Maximum wall height to the<br />

underside <strong>of</strong> the eaves for pitched<br />

ro<strong>of</strong><br />

Maximum wall height for<br />

flat/concealed ro<strong>of</strong><br />

Acceptable development provision Proposed<br />

6.0 metres 5.2 metres - 6.9 metres<br />

7.0 metres 7.4 metres<br />

Performance criteria:<br />

Building height consistent with the desired height <strong>of</strong> buildings in the locality, and to recognise the need to<br />

protect the amenities <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties, including, where appropriate:<br />

adequate direct sun to buildings and appurtenant open spaces;<br />

adequate daylight to major openings to habitable rooms; and<br />

access to views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

Due to the slope <strong>of</strong> the land and the provision <strong>of</strong> an undercr<strong>of</strong>t garage, the proposed dwelling<br />

exceeds the maximum permissible height to the front. The applicant has reduced the ceiling<br />

heights and floor levels to try to reduce the overall height. The majority <strong>of</strong> the over height<br />

section is adjoining the property to the east who have expressed that they have no objections to<br />

the proposed application.<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!