Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
future redevelopment and therefore it is considered to cancel out the loss <strong>of</strong> a street bay. In<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the double access <strong>of</strong>f Southport Street and the impact <strong>of</strong> up to two bays it is<br />
considered that this can be supported given the lot constraints in providing a suitable and<br />
workable car park area.<br />
POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessed<br />
against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />
If <strong>Council</strong> accepts cash-in-lieu <strong>of</strong> a shortfall <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 15 bays (12 on site and 3 street parking<br />
bays) at a cost <strong>of</strong> $7,500 per bay, <strong>Council</strong> will receive $112,500 to be held in reserve for future<br />
parking improvements in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the subject site.<br />
STRATEGIC DIRECTION:<br />
Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for the<br />
priority area 'Planning for our Community'.<br />
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION:<br />
This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirements for<br />
consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme.<br />
SUMMARY:<br />
The proposed land uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice and restaurant are consistent with the Commercial zoning <strong>of</strong><br />
the subject lot.<br />
The proposal is generally in keeping with the building design outcomes stipulated in Policy 6.5<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual and the West Leederville Planning and Urban<br />
Design Study, however, it is recommended that the design is slightly modified so that the<br />
building's entrances are clearly identifiable. The desire for a strong urban form, interaction with<br />
the streetscape, and landscaped gardens are all addressed by the height, scale and design <strong>of</strong><br />
the development. A high quality <strong>of</strong> landscaping is desired and should be conditioned in such a<br />
way that ensures this.<br />
A plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.63 is considered to significant, however, a plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.4:1 can be supported<br />
due to the uniqueness <strong>of</strong> the site and potential for a landmark building and the character <strong>of</strong> the<br />
site surrounds. The widening <strong>of</strong> the easement will also provide benefits to three neighbouring<br />
properties. Furthermore, the desired future character <strong>of</strong> the Southport Street Node is for larger,<br />
taller buildings, to take advantage <strong>of</strong> the Node's close proximity to the city, Leederville, West<br />
Perth, three railway stations and the freeway. At a plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.4:1 the parking required<br />
including concessions is reduced to 27 bays, with 19 bays provided a shortfall <strong>of</strong> 8 bays exist.<br />
Cash-in-lieu for these bays is supported with a discounted rate, having regard to the exposure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the site to public transport as well as provision <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> trip facilities for cyclists and walkers.<br />
Recommended cash-in-lieu contribution is $60,000 based on the charge <strong>of</strong> $7,500 per bay.<br />
Overall, the application is recommended for approval, subject to various conditions addressing<br />
matters raised in the body <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 58