16.11.2014 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

27a Simper Street, Wembley - Carport and patio<br />

14 Collier Street, Wembley - Front fence<br />

13 Caddy Avenue, West Leederville - Two storey dwelling<br />

107 Kimberley Street, West Leederville - Two storey dwelling<br />

177 <strong>Cambridge</strong> Street, West Leederville - Change <strong>of</strong> use from indoor pool facility to<br />

midwifery training facility (St John <strong>of</strong> God Hospital)<br />

34a Joseph Street, West Leederville - Single storey dwelling<br />

4 Connaught Street, West Leederville - Carport<br />

61 McCourt Street, West Leederville - Front fence (FAST TRACK)<br />

The following items were referred to the Western Australian Planning Commission with a<br />

recommendation for approval:-<br />

<br />

2 Keane Street, Wembley - Two lot green title subdivision<br />

The following items are notifications <strong>of</strong> applications for review and decisions for <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

information:-<br />

Applications for Review (Appeals) - received<br />

No applications for review were lodged with the State Administrative Tribunal against decisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> during November 2011.<br />

Applications for Review (Appeals) - determined<br />

Property: Lot 800 (No. 31) Gayton Road, City Beach<br />

Proposal: Proposed built strata subdivision <strong>of</strong> shopping centre<br />

On 30 November 2011, the State Administrative Tribunal advised that the application for review<br />

was withdrawn.<br />

Compliance<br />

On 30 September 2011, a Dog Act Prosecution was heard before the Perth Magistrates Court.<br />

On that day the accused was convicted on both charges <strong>of</strong> "Dog Attack". The court agreed with<br />

submissions made on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> that the attacks were extremely serious. However, in<br />

imposing fines in relation to the matters the Magistrate took into account that the accused had<br />

paid the complainant's veterinary bills in the sum <strong>of</strong> $8,900.00. On the first charge, the accused<br />

was fined $4,000.00. On the second charge, the accused was fined $2000.00 and ordered to<br />

pay costs <strong>of</strong> $1,476.45.<br />

On 4 November 2011, a Dog Act Prosecution was heard before the Perth Magistrates Court.<br />

On that day the accused appeared in person and was convicted on three charges <strong>of</strong> "Dog<br />

Attack". The accused pleaded guilty to the charges, the court imposed a fine <strong>of</strong> $1000.00 on<br />

each charge and ordered to pay costs <strong>of</strong> $1,124.70.<br />

On 7 November 2011, a Parking Prosecution came before the Perth Magistrates Court for<br />

hearing. On that day the accused did not attend Court and was convicted in her absence<br />

pursuant to section 55 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedures Act 2004. Upon conviction, the accused was<br />

fined $200.00 and ordered to pay costs in the amount <strong>of</strong> $500.00.<br />

A Parking Prosecution came before the Perth Magistrates Court on the 16 November 2011, the<br />

accused did not attend and was convicted in his absence pursuant to section 55 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!