Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
27a Simper Street, Wembley - Carport and patio<br />
14 Collier Street, Wembley - Front fence<br />
13 Caddy Avenue, West Leederville - Two storey dwelling<br />
107 Kimberley Street, West Leederville - Two storey dwelling<br />
177 <strong>Cambridge</strong> Street, West Leederville - Change <strong>of</strong> use from indoor pool facility to<br />
midwifery training facility (St John <strong>of</strong> God Hospital)<br />
34a Joseph Street, West Leederville - Single storey dwelling<br />
4 Connaught Street, West Leederville - Carport<br />
61 McCourt Street, West Leederville - Front fence (FAST TRACK)<br />
The following items were referred to the Western Australian Planning Commission with a<br />
recommendation for approval:-<br />
<br />
2 Keane Street, Wembley - Two lot green title subdivision<br />
The following items are notifications <strong>of</strong> applications for review and decisions for <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
information:-<br />
Applications for Review (Appeals) - received<br />
No applications for review were lodged with the State Administrative Tribunal against decisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> during November 2011.<br />
Applications for Review (Appeals) - determined<br />
Property: Lot 800 (No. 31) Gayton Road, City Beach<br />
Proposal: Proposed built strata subdivision <strong>of</strong> shopping centre<br />
On 30 November 2011, the State Administrative Tribunal advised that the application for review<br />
was withdrawn.<br />
Compliance<br />
On 30 September 2011, a Dog Act Prosecution was heard before the Perth Magistrates Court.<br />
On that day the accused was convicted on both charges <strong>of</strong> "Dog Attack". The court agreed with<br />
submissions made on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> that the attacks were extremely serious. However, in<br />
imposing fines in relation to the matters the Magistrate took into account that the accused had<br />
paid the complainant's veterinary bills in the sum <strong>of</strong> $8,900.00. On the first charge, the accused<br />
was fined $4,000.00. On the second charge, the accused was fined $2000.00 and ordered to<br />
pay costs <strong>of</strong> $1,476.45.<br />
On 4 November 2011, a Dog Act Prosecution was heard before the Perth Magistrates Court.<br />
On that day the accused appeared in person and was convicted on three charges <strong>of</strong> "Dog<br />
Attack". The accused pleaded guilty to the charges, the court imposed a fine <strong>of</strong> $1000.00 on<br />
each charge and ordered to pay costs <strong>of</strong> $1,124.70.<br />
On 7 November 2011, a Parking Prosecution came before the Perth Magistrates Court for<br />
hearing. On that day the accused did not attend Court and was convicted in her absence<br />
pursuant to section 55 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedures Act 2004. Upon conviction, the accused was<br />
fined $200.00 and ordered to pay costs in the amount <strong>of</strong> $500.00.<br />
A Parking Prosecution came before the Perth Magistrates Court on the 16 November 2011, the<br />
accused did not attend and was convicted in his absence pursuant to section 55 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 133