Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
ground level at the respective points. Further to this there are currently 1.8 metre high boundary<br />
fences to both sides and the single-storey ancillary accommodation development will barely<br />
protrude above the fence line at any point. This minimises the impact <strong>of</strong> the proposal in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
building bulk and access to direct sun to the adjoining lots to the south and west.<br />
The location <strong>of</strong> development on the adjoining lot to the east means that the outdoor area to the<br />
rear <strong>of</strong> the property is largely shaded from the northern sun and the proposed ancillary<br />
accommodation on the subject site will have minimal additional impact on this area. In addition<br />
to this the main outdoor living are on the adjoining lot is located on the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property and so the proposed additions will have no impact on this area.<br />
Given the proposed ro<strong>of</strong>ing projects only 1.4 metres above the fencing at the rear boundary at<br />
its highest point and that a minimum 4.0 metres setback is retained to the rear <strong>of</strong> the lot, the<br />
proposed ancillary accommodation will not have any significant impact on any adjoining<br />
property in terms <strong>of</strong> overshadowing.<br />
There are examples <strong>of</strong> similar development within the required 6.0 metre rear setback in the<br />
surrounding precinct, including the adjoining property to the east, and as such the proposal is<br />
consistent with the character <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />
The proposed ancillary accommodation development with a lowered finished floor level to the<br />
south and west, and no major openings facing the east.<br />
It is noted that the size <strong>of</strong> the ancillary accommodation does exceed the maximum floor area<br />
under the acceptable development provisions however, the development has due regard to the<br />
topography <strong>of</strong> the site and is designed to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> aged or dependent persons.<br />
In summary the ancillary accommodation improves the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development without<br />
having an adverse impact on the adjoining lots in terms <strong>of</strong> building bulk, access to direct sun,<br />
ventilation and privacy and notwithstanding neighbour concerns, it is considered that the<br />
performance criteria are satisfied in this case.<br />
Overall, it is considered that the setback <strong>of</strong> the ancillary accommodation from the southern<br />
boundary complies with the performance criteria for the following reasons:-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
provides adequate direct sun and ventilation to the building,<br />
provides adequate direct sun to the building and appurtenant open spaces,<br />
assists with protection <strong>of</strong> access to direct sun for adjoining properties,<br />
assists in ameliorating the impacts <strong>of</strong> building bulk on adjoining properties,<br />
assists in protecting privacy between adjoining properties.<br />
POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessed<br />
against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme<br />
No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 99