Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 20 DECEMBER 2011<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
setback <strong>of</strong> the dwelling at # 311 so afternoon sun would not be restricted into their<br />
courtyard.<br />
As our proposed dwelling is <strong>of</strong> a single level and is positioned to the rear <strong>of</strong> the property,<br />
there would be no issues relating to building bulk and would have minimal impact to the<br />
streetscape.<br />
Due to the orientation <strong>of</strong> the site, there will be no overshadowing concerns.<br />
It is evident that the privacy <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties will be maintained as there are no<br />
windows within close proximity <strong>of</strong> the side and rear lot boundaries which would permit<br />
overlooking into habitable spaces.<br />
Neighbour submission<br />
The adjoining neighbours to the south, west and east were given a 14 day advertising period to<br />
comment on the proposed ancillary accommodation application. One response was received<br />
from the eastern neighbours and the following summarises their comments:-<br />
<br />
<br />
When designing and constructing my new home careful consideration was given to the<br />
outdoor living area at the rear <strong>of</strong> our property to ensure afternoon sunlight would not be<br />
restricted from the area which includes a below ground spa pool.<br />
Our enclosed garage which backs on to the area was minimised in height by lowering the<br />
ground level, incorporated a flat ro<strong>of</strong> and has a 5.6 metre setback from the rear boundary.<br />
The proposed rear boundary setbacks including the planned double garage are 4.0<br />
metres to 4.96 metres. As the planned garage is also higher than the natural ground level<br />
at our property, it would not only restrict direct sunlight to our outdoor living area but the<br />
proposed building bulk including a 25º pitched ro<strong>of</strong>, would greatly impact on our outdoor<br />
living area both with regards to over shadowing and the abovementioned direct sunlight<br />
restrictions.<br />
Assessment against the performance criteria<br />
Boundary setbacks<br />
Proposed<br />
Acceptable development provision<br />
Rear (south) setback 4.0 metres 6.0 metres<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
Buildings setback from boundaries other than street boundaries so as to:<br />
provide adequate direct sun and ventilation to the building;<br />
ensure adequate direct sun and ventilation being available to adjoining properties;<br />
provide adequate direct sun to the building and appurtenant open spaces;<br />
assist with protection <strong>of</strong> access to direct sun for adjoining properties;<br />
assist in ameliorating the impacts <strong>of</strong> building bulk on adjoining properties; and<br />
assist in protecting privacy between adjoining properties.<br />
The proposed ancillary accommodation has a finished floor level below natural ground level at<br />
all points on the lot. Similarly this finished floor level is below the natural ground level at the<br />
southern and western boundary ranging between 0.55 metres and 2.35 metres below natural<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\11 MINUTES\DECEMBER 2011\B DV.DOCX 98