16.11.2014 Views

MQM 421 Organizational Behavior - Illinois State University

MQM 421 Organizational Behavior - Illinois State University

MQM 421 Organizational Behavior - Illinois State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Spring 2012 <strong>Illinois</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />

COURSE:<br />

PREREQUISITE:<br />

RESOURCES:<br />

INSTRUCTOR:<br />

<strong>MQM</strong> <strong>421</strong> <strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong><br />

<strong>MQM</strong> 402; Student must have met the<br />

prerequisites to remain in the class.<br />

1.) Jerald Greenberg, <strong>Behavior</strong> in<br />

Organizations, 5th ed., Mason, OH:<br />

Thomson, 2010. ISBN-10: 0131992384<br />

2.) C. Neck and C. Manz. Mastering Self-<br />

Leadership, Upper Saddle River, NJ.<br />

Prentice-Hall, 2010. ISBN-10: 0136066453<br />

3.) Articles, PPT’s, and Handouts are stored on<br />

the COB u:drive.<br />

4.) Cases, available for purchase at Harvard<br />

Business School<br />

Dr. Michael P. Dumler<br />

TIME AND LOCATION: M: 6:00 - 8:50; SFHB 133<br />

OFFICE HOURS:<br />

OFFICE/PHONE:<br />

E-MAIL<br />

By Appointment<br />

SFHB 210; 438-8564 (Leave MSG on Voice-<br />

Mail)<br />

mpdumler@ilstu.edu<br />

COURSE DESCRIPTION:<br />

The course provides a broad exposure to many topics in the field of organizational behavior.<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong> behavior focuses on understanding individual, and group behavior in applied<br />

organizational contexts. Common topics in the study of organizational behavior include learning,<br />

perception, conflict, power, leadership, motivation, and organizational change. One goal of the<br />

course is to review current theories of individual and group behavior and apply theoretic<br />

explanations for common situations that managers often experience. Articles, cases, and group<br />

discussion are used to achieve this goal. Students are expected to voluntarily participate in each<br />

the aforementioned activities.<br />

COURSE OBJECTIVES:<br />

1. Identify explanatory factors that contribute to understanding human<br />

behavior in organizations.<br />

2. Use and evaluate assessment tools for understanding individual<br />

differences.<br />

3. Understanding individual and group behavior at work through the use of<br />

articles, cases, experiential exercises, and topic research.<br />

4. Develop critical thinking skills applied to understanding our own attitudes<br />

and behavior at work and those of other members of the organization.


<strong>MQM</strong> <strong>421</strong> <strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong> Spring<br />

2012<br />

5. Enhance leadership skills and written and oral communication skills. The<br />

student will present the results of management research to the class, as<br />

well as, write a graduate-level paper in an area of organization behavior.<br />

RESEARCH PAPER [DUE: 4-16]<br />

A graduate-level paper is a course requirement. The paper should review current research or<br />

writing about a particular issue or topic (e.g., Emotional Intelligence, Emotional Labor, Goal<br />

Setting, Self-leadership, <strong>Organizational</strong> Culture, Burnout, Leader-Member Exchange, Fairness<br />

and Justice at Work, Impression Management, etc.). Pick a topic that you have interest in or<br />

examine the topic in a specific context (e.g., health care, sports, insurance). In any event, the<br />

topic chosen should have a solid theoretical foundation and demonstrate the theory's practical<br />

utility to managers. Remember, this is not an exercise in theory but rather a source of<br />

information that should be useful to managers.<br />

I<br />

RESEARCH PAPER (10 pgs. minimum). The purpose of this type of paper should be to review<br />

a topic discussed in the literature. The focus of the paper should be on new or recent research<br />

findings over the past 10 years. It is best to pick a well-defined topic or body of literature (e.g.,<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong> Citizenship <strong>Behavior</strong>) and write your paper on that topic. By Week 5 (2/20) each<br />

student doing a issue/topic review should submit: (1) an annotated (one paragraph annotation<br />

per article) bibliography (i.e., complete citation in APA style) that lists about 15 articles for the<br />

topic review paper, and (2) include a table that organizes the articles on some basis<br />

appropriate to the topic under investigation. Your classification schema should serve to group<br />

articles into workable sub-topics. This simply means that you organize your articles in a table<br />

with the articles as rows and columns that separate or classify your articles in some manner<br />

(e.g., classify as empirical or conceptual).<br />

TEAM WORK<br />

The class will be divided into five teams (e.g., teams will be designated T1, T2; “shadow teams”<br />

designated as S1, S2).<br />

Presenting Team (T) is responsible for delivering class content for two class sessions. This<br />

task includes presenting an article and/or case, leading article/case discussion, and creating<br />

and transmitting to the instructor a PowerPoint presentation of the article or article/case and a<br />

written analysis of the case (during the second rotation, you only need a written analysis for the<br />

case. However, you may still choose to use PPT in your presentation). A written case analysis<br />

should include: (1.) an introduction to the general situation or problem, (2.) a review of case<br />

facts that clarify the specific issue(s) (this includes any analysis), (3.) at least two alternatives,<br />

and (3.) a recommendation for action. For all written assignments, please include a cover page<br />

with team number, members names, assignment name, date (Please number every page,<br />

except the cover page).<br />

Shadow Team (S) is responsible for questioning the presenting group and critiquing the group<br />

presentation. The shadow team submits a one page critique of the case (Due at the time of the<br />

presentation) indicating major issues, and recommendations to resolve issues or problems.<br />

Other Teams should read the case and offer any ideas of suggestions during discussion.<br />

2<br />

<strong>Illinois</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong>


<strong>MQM</strong> <strong>421</strong> <strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong> Spring<br />

2012<br />

This will be a time when the instructor expects voluntary participation from group members and<br />

records your participation quantity and quality. Successful team work requires planning,<br />

coordinating, leadership, and motivation -- to name a few managerial skills. Remember that<br />

while two teams are responsible for the nightly topic and case, all class members should<br />

read all required material and be prepared to voluntarily contribute to the general<br />

discussion. All articles are on the u:drive and cases can be purchased at:<br />

http://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cb/access/12329004<br />

ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION<br />

Attendance is mandatory for active involvement in the class.<br />

Participation means:<br />

Reading all Material prior to class.<br />

Being prepared to get involved in class discussion.<br />

Taking notes or record ideas for future reference.<br />

Be a good Team member - help your team succeed.<br />

Trusting your experience and judgment -- it got you this far.<br />

Helping create the social environment and not react to it.<br />

EVALUATION PROCEDURE<br />

EXAM # 1 25% 100<br />

EXAM # 2 25% 100<br />

PAPER 25% 100<br />

Participation 10% 40<br />

Cases 15% 60<br />

TOTAL<br />

100% 400pts<br />

3<br />

<strong>Illinois</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong>


<strong>MQM</strong> <strong>421</strong> <strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong> Spring<br />

2012<br />

All Articles and Handouts are available on the COB u:drive.<br />

Neck Article/Exercise<br />

Session<br />

Greenberg and<br />

Content<br />

Manz<br />

1 1-23<br />

Class organization<br />

and responsibilities<br />

2 1-30<br />

Introduction to<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong><br />

<strong>Behavior</strong><br />

Chapter 1,2<br />

#0 Drucker, P. (2005). Managing<br />

Oneself. Harvard Business Review, 83<br />

(1).<br />

#00 Livingston, J. S. (2003). Pygmalion<br />

in management (HBR Classic). Harvard<br />

Business Review, 81(1), 97-106<br />

3 2-6<br />

T1<br />

Perception and<br />

Personality<br />

Changing<br />

Employee <strong>Behavior</strong><br />

Chapter 3 1-2<br />

#1 Rousseau, D. M. (2004).<br />

Psychological contracts in the workplace:<br />

Understanding the ties that motivate.<br />

Academy of Management Executive,<br />

18(1), 120-127.<br />

#2 Levinson, Harry. Abrasive Personality.<br />

Harvard Business Review. (Nov. Dec.),<br />

1999 (also 1967).<br />

T1 Discussion of Chapters 1-2 (N&M)<br />

Self-Assessment/Exercise Greenberg<br />

(Self-Efficacy exercise, p 97)<br />

4 2-13<br />

T2 Motivation Chapter 6 #3 McClelland and Burnham. (1995, also<br />

1976). Power is a Great Motivator.<br />

Harvard Business Review, (Jan-Feb).<br />

#4 Kerr, s. (1995). On the Folly of<br />

Rewarding A While Hoping for B.<br />

Academy of Management Executive,<br />

9(1), 7-14.<br />

Self-Assessment/Exercise Greenberg<br />

(What Rewards do you value?, p. 188)<br />

5 2-20 T3 Decision Making Chapter 10<br />

#5 Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006).<br />

Evidence-based management. Harvard<br />

Business Review<br />

4<br />

<strong>Illinois</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong>


<strong>MQM</strong> <strong>421</strong> <strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong> Spring<br />

2012<br />

#6 Garvin, David and M. Roberto. (2001)<br />

What you don't know about making<br />

decisions. Harvard Business Review,<br />

September, 108-116.<br />

Self-Assessment/Exercise Greenberg<br />

(Are you risk seeking or risk averse?, p.<br />

307)<br />

#7 Ferris et al. (2000) Political Skills at<br />

work. <strong>Organizational</strong> Dynamics, 26, 25-<br />

37.<br />

#8 Perrewe et al. (2000) Political Skill: an<br />

antidote for workplace stressors.<br />

6 2-27 Power and Political<br />

Academy of Management Executive, 14,<br />

<strong>Behavior</strong><br />

115-123.<br />

Self-Assessment/Exercise Greenberg<br />

T4<br />

(T4 will need to find an appropriate<br />

assessment for power)<br />

7 3-5 Exam1<br />

8 3-12 Spring Break<br />

Chapter 11 3 #9 Goffee and Jones. (2000). Why<br />

should anyone want to be lead by you?<br />

Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct.<br />

T5<br />

9 3-19 Leadership<br />

#10 Zalesnik, A. (1992, also 1977).<br />

Managers and Leaders: Are they<br />

different? Harvard Business Review.<br />

Mar-Apr.<br />

Discussion of Chapter 3 (N&M)<br />

T5 SLQ1, p. 16 or Self-<br />

Assessment/Exercise<br />

Greenberg,(Determining your leadership<br />

style, p. 337)<br />

10 3-26<br />

#11 Bill George, et al. (2007) Discovering<br />

your Authentic Leadership, Harvard<br />

Chapter 11 4 Case #1 A Day in the life of Alex Sanders<br />

T1<br />

Business Review, 2, 1-8.


<strong>MQM</strong> <strong>421</strong> <strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong> Spring<br />

2012<br />

Discussion of Chapter 4 (N&M)<br />

T2<br />

5-6 Case #2 Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant<br />

S4<br />

11 4-2<br />

#12 Schrank, Robert (1994). Two<br />

Groups, Teams and<br />

Chapter 9<br />

Women, Three Men on a Raft. Harvard<br />

Teamwork<br />

Business Review, (May-June).<br />

Discussion of Chapters 5-6 (N&M)<br />

7-8 Case #3 Thomas Green: Power, Office<br />

Politics, and A Career in Crisis.<br />

12 4-9<br />

Managing Conflict,<br />

#13 Amason, A., Hochwarter, W.,<br />

Burnout and Stress<br />

Thompson K., and Harrison, A. (1995).<br />

[Research Paper<br />

Conflict: An Important Dimension in<br />

Due]<br />

Successful Management Team.”<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong> Dynamics, 24(2), 20-35.<br />

T3<br />

S2<br />

Discussion of Chapters 7-8 (N&M)<br />

Chapter 8<br />

Chapter 12<br />

9-10 Case #4 Stone Finch, Inc<br />

13 4-16<br />

Communication<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong><br />

#14 Tannen, D. (1995). The power of talk:<br />

Who gets heard and why? Harvard<br />

Culture<br />

Business Review, 73 (5), 138-148.<br />

T4<br />

S3<br />

Discussion of Chapters 9-10 (N&M)<br />

Chapter 14 11-12 Case #5 Campbell and Bailyn’s Office<br />

14 4-23<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong><br />

#15 Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change:<br />

Change<br />

Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard<br />

<strong>Organizational</strong><br />

Business<br />

Change<br />

Review, 73(2), 59-67.<br />

T5<br />

S1<br />

Discussion of Chapters 11-12 (N&M)<br />

15 4-30 EXAM 2<br />

16 5-7<br />

Return Papers and<br />

Final exam Grades

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!