15.11.2014 Views

A guide to third sector trading - WCVA

A guide to third sector trading - WCVA

A guide to third sector trading - WCVA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It’s an idea, but is it business? A <strong>guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>third</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>trading</strong><br />

1: Getting<br />

started<br />

2: First steps 3: Business<br />

planning<br />

4: Legal and<br />

governance<br />

5: Funding<br />

and<br />

resourcing<br />

6: Financial<br />

controls<br />

7: Managing<br />

growth<br />

8: Management<br />

and<br />

governance<br />

9: Social<br />

enterprise<br />

10: Sources<br />

of support<br />

− there is a risk that discussions will be repeated when reports<br />

reach the main board, leading <strong>to</strong> duplication and frustration<br />

for committee members.<br />

A ‘Finance Team’: This might take the form of a very small<br />

committee and act like one. Its membership might be limited <strong>to</strong><br />

the manager and the Treasurer.<br />

• Advantages: a potentially tight-knit group with a clear focus<br />

which is easier than a larger committee <strong>to</strong> bring <strong>to</strong>gether<br />

when needed.<br />

• Disadvantages:<br />

− the small size means that scheduled meetings may be<br />

abandoned if only one member is unavailable<br />

− teams of only two people may be efficient, but they do not<br />

necessarily provide good scrutiny – members will be less likely<br />

<strong>to</strong> ask searching questions, and may be perceived by the rest<br />

of the board <strong>to</strong> be a clique<br />

− the finance team can be an excuse for other board members<br />

not taking any interest in finance at all.<br />

Scrutiny by the parent charity: As a minimum, a charity should<br />

au<strong>to</strong>matically receive the same financial reports as the board of<br />

the <strong>trading</strong> company, and it is free <strong>to</strong> ask for further information<br />

at any time. It is good practice for the charity board <strong>to</strong> include a<br />

direc<strong>to</strong>r of the <strong>trading</strong> subsidiary who has good business skills,<br />

and can communicate information <strong>to</strong> the trustees.<br />

Independent oversight:<br />

• Dangerous suspicion: It is vital that there are routine and<br />

recognised systems for checking for and detecting fraud<br />

by staff and officers. This is not just a safeguard against<br />

dishonesty. Everyone needs <strong>to</strong> be protected against suspicion<br />

of fraud, particularly those whose roles expose them most <strong>to</strong><br />

this possibility. This is because of the serious damage which is<br />

caused <strong>to</strong> trust and relationships when anyone is suspected of<br />

financial irregularity or misusing resources.<br />

• The need for ‘backs<strong>to</strong>ps’: In practice it means that all actions<br />

involving the use of the organisation’s resources in any<br />

significant way need <strong>to</strong> involve at least two people – in the same<br />

way that cheques must routinely be signed by two individuals.<br />

The personnel providing these roles as backs<strong>to</strong>ps do not need<br />

<strong>to</strong> be selected specially, they simply need <strong>to</strong> be specified by<br />

written procedures – a second person <strong>to</strong> oversee the recording<br />

and banking of cash, authorisation for staff <strong>to</strong> make purchases<br />

over a certain value, someone <strong>to</strong> verify staff and board<br />

expenses, and so on.<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!