City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices

More documents

Recommendations

Info

City of Oxnard | Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan A.7.4. Bicycle Lanes at Interchanges Design Summary Bicycle Lane Width: The bicycle lane width through the interchange should be the same width as the approaching bicycle lane (minimum five feet). Additionally, bicycle lane should follow guidance in sections A.3.2 through 1.3.3. Recommended Design Discussion On high traffic bicycle corridors non-standard treatments may be desirable over current practices outlined in Figure 9C-104 in the California MUTCD. Dashed bicycle lane lines with or without colored bicycle lanes may be applied to provide increased visibility for bicycles in the merging area. Design Example Guidance • This treatment is not currently present in any State or Federal design standards • City of Chicago - Green Pavement Markings for Bicycle Lanes (Ongoing) - FHWA Experiment No. 9-77(E) • Portland’s Blue Bicycle Lanes http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=58 842 Alta Planning + Design | A-53
Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.7.5. Cycle Tracks Design Summary Cycle Track Width: 7 feet minimum to allow passing and obstacle avoidance 12 feet minimum for two-way facility Recommended Design – No Parking Discussion A cycle track is a hybrid type bicycle facility that combines the experience of a separated path with the on-street infrastructure of a conventional bicycle lane. Cycle tracks have different forms, but all share common elements. Cycle tracks provide space that is intended to be exclusively or primarily for bicycles, and is separated from vehicle travel lanes, parking lanes and sidewalks. Cycle tracks can be either one-way or two-way, on one or both sides of a street, and are separated from vehicles and pedestrians by bollards, curbs/medians, mountable curbs or a combination of these elements; pavement marking or coloring are at times used for further differentiation. See following page for additional discussion. Design Example Recommended Design – On-Street Parking 9th Avenue – New York City Guidance • This treatment is not currently present in any U.S. State or Federal design manuals • Crow Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic - Chapter 5 A-54 | Alta Planning + Design
Page 1 and 2:
City of Oxnard Bicycle & Pedestrian
Page 3 and 4: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Tabl
Page 5 and 6: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Figu
Page 7 and 8: Appendix A | Design Guidelines •
Page 9 and 10: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Desi
Page 11 and 12: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.2.
Page 15 and 16: Appendix A | Design Guidelines http
Page 17 and 18: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
Page 27 and 28: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4
Page 39 and 40: Appendix A | Design Guidelines •
Page 45 and 46: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Cove
Page 53: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
Page 79 and 80: Appendix A | Design Guidelines This
Page 81 and 82: Appendix B | Trip and Emissions Red
Page 89 and 90: Appendix C | Safety Review Table of
Page 91 and 92: Appendix C | Safety Review Route Be
Page 93 and 94: Appendix C | Safety Review Existing
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix C | Safety Review Route Be
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix C | Safety Review Existing
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix C | Safety Review This pag
Page 131:
Appendix D | Bicycle Transportation
show all

City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?