City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices

More documents

Recommendations

Info

City of Oxnard | Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan A.4.9. Bicycle Routes/Bicycle Boulevards at Local/Major Unsignalized Intersections – Crossing Islands Design Summary Design Example Crossing Island Width: 8’ Striping and intersection treatments vary. See following page for additional discussion. Discussion Bicycle crossing islands enable crossing for bicyclists where traffic signals or other designs may not be feasible. Guidance • Caltrans Highway Design Manual (Chapter 1000) • California MUTCD • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities Recommended Design (not to scale) Alta Planning + Design | A-35
Appendix A | Design Guidelines Additional Discussion - Bicycle Route/Bicycle Boulevards at Local/Major Unsignalized Intersections – Crossing Islands Special Considerations for Bicyclists at Local/Major Unsignalized Intersections At intersections of Bicycle Boulevards/bicycle routes and major unsignalized intersections, a bicycle crossing island should be provided to allow bicyclists to cross one direction of traffic at a time when gaps in traffic allow. The bicycle crossing island should be at least 8 feet wide (measured perpendicular to the centerline of the major road) to be used as a bicycle refuge. Narrower medians can accommodate bikes if the holding area is at an acute angle to the major roadway, which allows stopped bicyclists to face oncoming motorists. Crossing islands should be in the middle of the intersection, thus prohibiting left and through vehicle movements or at the sides in conjunction with a high-visibility crosswalk (left turn prohibition is recommended). Advantages of bicycle crossing islands Provides safe refuge in the median of the major street so that bicyclists only have to cross one direction of traffic at a time – works well with signal controlled traffic platoons coming from opposite directions. Provides traffic calming and safety benefits by preventing left turns and/or through traffic from using the intersection. Disadvantages / potential hazards • Potential impacts to major roadway, including lane narrowing, loss of some on-street parking and restricted turning movements. • Crossing island may collect debris and may be difficult to maintain. A-36 | Alta Planning + Design
Page 1 and 2: City of Oxnard Bicycle & Pedestrian
Page 3 and 4: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Tabl
Page 5 and 6: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Figu
Page 7 and 8: Appendix A | Design Guidelines •
Page 9 and 10: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Desi
Page 11 and 12: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.2.
Page 15 and 16: Appendix A | Design Guidelines http
Page 17 and 18: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
Page 27 and 28: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4
Page 35: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4.
Page 39 and 40: Appendix A | Design Guidelines •
Page 45 and 46: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Cove
Page 79 and 80: Appendix A | Design Guidelines This
Page 81 and 82: Appendix B | Trip and Emissions Red
Page 87 and 88:
Appendix B | Trip and Emissions Red
Page 89 and 90:
Appendix C | Safety Review Table of
Page 91 and 92:
Appendix C | Safety Review Route Be
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix C | Safety Review Existing
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix C | Safety Review This pag
Page 131:
Appendix D | Bicycle Transportation
show all

City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?