City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices
City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices City of Oxnard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Appendices
City of Oxnard | Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan important and should be considered where riding at night is expected, such as on multi-use paths serving college students or commuters. Lighting should also be considered through underpasses or tunnels, at highway intersections, and when nighttime security could be a problem. Depending on the location, average maintained horizontal illumination levels of 0.5 foot-candle to 2 footcandle should be considered. Where special security problems exist, higher illumination levels may be considered. Light standards (poles) should meet the recommended horizontal and vertical clearances. Luminaries and standards should be at a scale appropriate for a pedestrian or multi-use path. Luminaires should be cutoff in design and utilize bulbs that provide optimum color quality. Uplighting along the paths should be avoided and shields or shrouds should be used where glare or light trespass may be an issue. The City of Oxnard Development Services Department should work with the City’s Transportation Department to establish lighting standards for equipment and lighting levels. A.2.2.11. Signage See section A.9 for information on signage. Alta Planning + Design | A-9
Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.2.3. Multi-use Paths in River & Utility Corridors Design Summary Preferred Design Preferred Width: 17’ (12’ paved area + 2’ shoulders on each side + 1’ clearance for signage), with 5’ for pedestrian path Minimum Design Standard: 13’ minimum (8’ paved area + 2’ shoulders on each side + 1’ clearance for signage) Height: 8’ min vertical clearance. If additional width allows, wider paths and bicycle path friendly landscaping are desirable. Discussion Several utility and waterway corridors in Oxnard offer potential path development opportunities. These corridors offer excellent transportation and recreation opportunities for bicyclists of all ages and skills. See following page for additional discussion. Guidance Flood control channels are not discussed specifically, but general multi-use path guidance is available in the following documents: • California MUTCD • Caltrans Highway Design Manual (Chapter 1000) • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities Design Example A-10 | Alta Planning + Design
- Page 1 and 2: City of Oxnard Bicycle & Pedestrian
- Page 3 and 4: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Tabl
- Page 5 and 6: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Figu
- Page 7 and 8: Appendix A | Design Guidelines •
- Page 9: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Desi
- Page 13 and 14: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.2.
- Page 15 and 16: Appendix A | Design Guidelines http
- Page 17 and 18: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 19 and 20: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 21 and 22: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 23 and 24: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.3.
- Page 25 and 26: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.3.
- Page 27 and 28: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4
- Page 29 and 30: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4.
- Page 31 and 32: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4.
- Page 33 and 34: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4.
- Page 35 and 36: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.4.
- Page 37 and 38: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 39 and 40: Appendix A | Design Guidelines •
- Page 41 and 42: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.6.
- Page 43 and 44: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 45 and 46: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Cove
- Page 47 and 48: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.6.
- Page 49 and 50: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.7.
- Page 51 and 52: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 53 and 54: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.7.
- Page 57 and 58: Appendix A | Design Guidelines Addi
- Page 59 and 60: Appendix A | Design Guidelines A.8.
<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong> | <strong>Bicycle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
important <strong>and</strong> should be considered where riding at night is expected, such as on multi-use paths serving<br />
college students or commuters. Lighting should also be considered through underpasses or tunnels, at<br />
highway intersections, <strong>and</strong> when nighttime security could be a problem.<br />
Depending on the location, average maintained horizontal illumination levels <strong>of</strong> 0.5 foot-c<strong>and</strong>le to 2 footc<strong>and</strong>le<br />
should be considered. Where special security problems exist, higher illumination levels may be<br />
considered. Light st<strong>and</strong>ards (poles) should meet the recommended horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical clearances.<br />
Luminaries <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards should be at a scale appropriate for a pedestrian or multi-use path. Luminaires<br />
should be cut<strong>of</strong>f in design <strong>and</strong> utilize bulbs that provide optimum color quality. Uplighting along the paths<br />
should be avoided <strong>and</strong> shields or shrouds should be used where glare or light trespass may be an issue. The<br />
<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong> Development Services Department should work with the <strong>City</strong>’s Transportation Department to<br />
establish lighting st<strong>and</strong>ards for equipment <strong>and</strong> lighting levels.<br />
A.2.2.11. Signage<br />
See section A.9 for information on signage.<br />
Alta <strong>Plan</strong>ning + Design | A-9
Change language