City Council 10-4-2011.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida
City Council 10-4-2011.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida
City Council 10-4-2011.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ealized. He recommended adding an equitable provision to the agreement that provided,<br />
“At such time those funds become available the <strong>City</strong> staff time would be reimbursed by<br />
the North Brevard Economic Development Zone.”<br />
In Section No. 6, Mayor Tulley requested adding an additional paragraph that provided<br />
and would “restrict the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> funds to subsidize individual private enterprises<br />
without explicit <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approval.” He felt governments should support building<br />
infrastructure and dollars that were used should be used for infrastructure that was<br />
friendly to all businesses, not just one or a few.<br />
Vice-Mayor Johnson commented on his understanding <strong>of</strong> Mayor Tulley’s request to add<br />
a new paragraph under Section No. 6. He did not agree with the additional language<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered by Mayor Tulley as he felt that it would eliminate the economic development<br />
process. Economic development required a variety <strong>of</strong> enticements.<br />
Mayor Tulley felt there could be better methods to promote economic development that<br />
did not involve competition. He desired the <strong>City</strong> or the North Brevard Area to be the<br />
premier entrepreneurial incubation and start-up place for many new small businesses that<br />
would synergize with one another and bring growth to the area. He also desired using<br />
funds to leverage this type <strong>of</strong> activity. To express his ideas, Mayor Tulley advised that<br />
the successful area <strong>of</strong> Silicon Valley in California began in this fashion.<br />
Planning and Growth Management Director Barker <strong>of</strong>fered a language amendment to the<br />
proposed interlocal agreement, under Section No. 6, paragraph A, “<strong>The</strong> District Board<br />
shall seek <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> any cash expenditure exceeding $50,000 payable<br />
annually from the <strong>City</strong> Account with the exception <strong>of</strong> cash incentives to a private<br />
enterprise in which the entire expenditure must be approved by <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.”<br />
Mayor Tulley and Vice-Mayor Johnson supported the revised language recommendation<br />
provided by Planning and Growth Management Barker.<br />
Member Burson clarified how the recommended language <strong>of</strong>fered by Planning and<br />
Growth Management Director Barker would work.<br />
Mayor Tulley requested <strong>City</strong> Attorney Broome restate the language amendment <strong>of</strong>fered<br />
by Planning and Growth Management Director Barker under Section No. 6, paragraph A.<br />
<strong>City</strong> Attorney Broome advised the language included “<strong>The</strong> District Board shall seek <strong>City</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> any cash expenditure exceeding $50,000 payable annually from the<br />
<strong>City</strong> Account with the exception <strong>of</strong> cash incentives to a private enterprise, which shall<br />
require the approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.”<br />
Motion:<br />
Member Pritchett moved to approve the proposed Interlocal Agreement with the County<br />
and the <strong>City</strong> on the Economic Development Zone with the <strong>City</strong> Attorney’s changes, with<br />
the amendment that Planning and Growth Management Director Barker read in Item