City Council 10-4-2011.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

City Council
Special Meeting
October 4, 2011
The City Council of the City of Titusville, Florida met in special session on Tuesday,
October 4, 2011 in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 555 South Washington Avenue,
Titusville, Florida.
xxx
Mayor Jim Tulley called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Those present were Mayor Jim
Tulley, Vice-Mayor Walt Johnson and Members Kathleen Burson, Martha Long, and
Rita Pritchett. Also present were Acting City Manager Tom Abbate, City Attorney
Richard Broome, and City Clerk Wanda Wells. Assistant City Clerk Jolynn Donhoff
completed the minutes.
xxx
Mayor Tulley advised the purpose of the meeting was to conclude the unfinished
business items of the regular City Council meeting on September 27, 2011.
xxx
Pastor Bernard C. Wright, Sr. of Bethlehem Baptist Church gave the invocation. Mayor
Tulley then led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and he highlighted
the procedure for public comment during the meeting.
Old Business:
xxx
Follow-up to City Council Discussion on Spaceport Commerce Park – Acting City
Manager Abbate advised that at the September 13, 2011 City Council Meeting, a Council
Member indicated that City staff was the originator of the proposal for a pad ready site
within the Spaceport Commerce Park and staff championed this concept to the Citizens’
Budget Advisory Committee (CBAC). It was noted that the CBAC made a
recommendation in August/September of 2011 to fund this pad ready site through
economic development funds.
During the September 13, 2011 City Council Meeting, discussion of the minutes from the
CBAC were cited as the source to validate that the pad ready site was the desire of staff,
which implied that City staff was the originator of this proposal. At this meeting, it was
explained that it was unknown who was the originator of this proposal and whether it was
initiated by the District One County Commissioner, Spaceport Commerce Park
Authority, Economic Development Commission of Florida’s Space Coast, (EDC), Space
Coast Economic Development Commission (SEDC), Brevard County Staff, or City Staff.
Further research was conducted following the regular City Council meeting of September
13, 2011, which was provided in the current report.

Acting City Manager Abbate advised that included in the meeting’s agenda package were
the February 14, 2011 minutes of the Spaceport Commerce Park Authority Meeting. This
meeting was one month prior to the commencement of meetings by the CBAC, which
began on March 3, 2011 and two months prior to the appointment of Mr. Curt Leady (the
advocate of the pad ready site proposal) to the CBAC on April 26, 2011. The CBAC
meeting minutes of February 14, 2011 indicated the originator of the proposed pad ready
site was the Commerce Park Authority.
Member Long commented on the accessibility of reviewing the meeting minutes of a few
of the aforementioned entities and her understanding of the responsibilities and objectives
that she believed were to be carried out independently by the Citizens’ Budget Advisory
Committee (CBAC), since its initial creation. She expressed that the City Manager or
Council who were affiliated with the Commerce Park Authority or the SEDC could have
used other opportunities to present the proposal for a pad ready site. She did not feel the
recommendation should have been made by the CBAC if it originated by another.
Mayor Tulley clarified that Member Long felt the pad ready site proposal would have
been acceptable to her if the idea had originated solely from the CBAC, not any of the
other entities.
Vice-Mayor Johnson commented on his affiliation with the Commerce Park Authority
and previous ideas that were discussed at its meetings. He commented on the CBAC’s
recommendation of the pad ready site and advised that he believed that minutes were
available for the Commerce Park Authority meetings.
Member Pritchett clarified whether the recommendation of funding a pad ready site
would provide a profit to an outside organization. Her impression of this recommendation
by the CBAC was one of excitement and an opportunity for the area. Additionally,
Member Pritchett supported the use of funding if it meant a return on investment. She
also emphasized appreciation to the CBAC Members who volunteered their time to the
committee. She was comfortable with the CBAC’s recommendation due to her belief that
the CBAC unanimously recommended the pad ready site.
Member Burson felt the original intention of establishing the CBAC was to improve the
budget and make any improvements to the City’s budget. She felt the pad ready site
recommendation was an economic development issue, not a budget improvement issue.
Vice-Mayor Johnson felt the mission of the CBAC was to provide any recommendations
for improvements.
Member Pritchett commented that the CBAC provided several recommendations during
the FY 2011/2012 budget session and those recommendations should also receive
attention.

Member Long referenced prior documentation and communication between the
Spaceport Commerce Park and the SEDC. She also referenced the CBAC meeting
minutes of July 21 st and the CBAC’s compilation of recommendations, which were
allegedly based on staff’s wish list. She would have preferred those recommendations, if
they were the SEDC’s or staff’s ideas, to have been recommended by the City Manager.
Her main point was to ask what Council would like from the CBAC moving forward. She
wanted the CBAC to be independent and not influenced by anyone else.
Mayor Tulley summarized that there seemed to be debate by Council whether the CBAC
worked independently. He then read from the CBAC’s mission objective whose copy was
provided to Council. In his opinion, he could support a good idea no matter its original
source. Vice-Mayor Johnson and Member Pritchett also shared the same opinion.
Mayor Tulley advised that ultimately, Council would make the decisions on these types
of issues. He requested that when the CBAC was ready to be reconstituted, their policy
be presented to Council to review the mission objectives.
Discussion ensued on the CBAC’s current mission objectives and making changes to the
CBAC’s policy mission upon their reformation.
Member Burson advised that she wanted the CBAC to be the committee that looked over
the City Manager’s shoulder and confirm that he did a good job preparing the budget.
Second, she wanted economic development ideas to come solely from individuals
involved with economic development. Third, she wanted the review of the City’s budget
and improvement recommendations to come solely from the CBAC.
Mayor Tulley requested the CBAC’s mission policy be placed on a future agenda. Acting
City Manager Abate advised that it would be placed on the regular City Council meeting
agenda of October 11, 2011.
New Business:
xxx
Strategic Planning – Acting City Manager Abbate advised that each year, the City
Council solicited input from both internal and external stakeholders as it refreshed the
City’s strategic goals and objectives. This process began in early February and
culminated in April with the adoption of the City’s Strategic Plan and Areas of Emphasis.
This plan then became the cornerstone document used by staff in determining resource
allocation requests and developing performance measures during the subsequent fiscal
year’s budget build.
Acting City Manager Abbate highlighted that from FY 2005 through FY 2011, Council
contracted with the Florida Institute of Government (FIG) to provide facilitation for the
various workshops, preparing summary reports and completing strategic plan formulation
tasks required to develop each year’s plan. This cost was approximately $2,500. For the

FY 2012 budget build, Council elected to utilize a new Strategic Plan facilitator and
directed staff to conduct an RFP to solicit bids from various public sector strategic
planning consultants. These bids ranged from $5,500 to $19,500. In December of 2010,
Council awarded the contract for FY 12 strategic planning services to LEAD Brevard at a
cost of $5,500. With their assistance, Council adopted the current formulated Strategic
Plan in April 2011 and it was incorporated as part of the FY 12 annual operating budget.
Member Pritchett recommended conducting the strategic planning process every other
year. She did not feel a lot could change each year and the strategic planning workshops
required Council and staff’s time. This could afford an opportunity to save on costs.
Member Long supported Member Pritchett’s idea, but she desired building upon the
current strategic plan and measuring its success thus far using matrixes and data.
Vice-Mayor Johnson supported Member Pritchett and Member Long’s recommendations.
Mayor Tulley desired holding the strategic planning sessions every year and using the
Florida Institute of Government each time due to their experience and cost savings they
afforded to the City. He also desired including more matrixes to measure the success of
the prior goals and using the five-year business plan early in the annual planning process,
which was introduced during the FY 2010/2011 budget cycle. His thoughts were to have
the citizens give their input on the business plan each year that strategic planning sessions
were held and for them to have a say on each annual budget prior to the final adoption.
Member Burson recommended directing staff to conduct an RFP to solicit bids from
various public sector strategic planning consultants. She was interested in different
approaches that could be used by various facilitators including any new planning methods
used by the Florida Institute of Government.
Member Long clarified the cost of the RFP solicitation process was based on staff time.
She supported utilizing the services of the Florida Institute of Government and Marilyn
Crotty due to her experience and familiarity with the City and that the cost was lower.
She reiterated that she desired matrixes and that she wished to build upon the City’s fiveyear
business plan.
Mayor Tulley, Vice-Mayor Johnson and Member Pritchett supported Member Long’s
thoughts if the City were to decide to hold strategic planning sessions each year rather
than every other year. Member Pritchett felt that Marilyn Crotty had an excellent ability
to facilitate communication. Vice Mayor-Johnson expressed that he supported the
aforementioned ideas.
Member Pritchett clarified that one of the goals of strategic planning was to receive
citizen input during the planning process.
Mayor Tulley highlighted the schedule of prior years’ strategic planning sessions.
Initially, the first strategic planning sessions began with a meeting with the City Council

and staff so that Council could consider the staff’s point of view or goals. Then, the
Council held its own special meeting to review, discuss, and collaborate their own
visions, goals, etc. and how they would affect the next year’s budget. Mayor Tulley
advised that during his first year as the Mayor, he initiated adding an additional meeting
to the strategic planning session schedule to allow input from the citizens early in the
process. He advised that the struggle over the prior three years was how to get citizen
input early in the process. He reiterated that he desired matrixes to measure the success of
the prior goals, using the five-year business plan early in the annual planning process, and
getting the most from input by the citizens early in the process.
Member Pritchett recommended getting Council’s input on items they did and did not
need to focus on, in preparation of a 2012/2013 strategic planning session. She did not
like the Council personality profiles analysis that was conducted during the 2011/2012
strategic planning session.
Acting City Manager Abbate advised that Marilyn Crotty was knowledgeable with the
Florida Bench Marking Consortium and would or may have performance measures used
by peer cities that Council might wish to utilize during the 2012/2013 strategic planning
process.
Mayor Tulley summarized there seemed to be a consensus among Council to conduct the
strategic planning session again in 2012/2013, include matrixes and performance data,
utilize the five year business plan and citizen input early in the process, use the services
provided by the Florida Institute of Government and Marilyn Crotty, and have staff report
back to Council. No further discussion ensued.
xxx
Interlocal Agreement with the County and the City on the Economic Development Zone
– Acting City Manager Abbate advised that the City and the County had both adopted tax
increment financing (TIF) districts to include the commercial and industrial properties of
the North Brevard Area. The purpose of the TIF districts was to provide a funding source
for economic development in the North Brevard area. The City and the County proposed
an interlocal agreement to provide guidance on the relationship of the City funds with the
County funds, the approval of said funds, and the provision of City staff to manage the
funds and provide staff to the Board of the Economic Development Zone. At this
meeting, the Council would review and consider approval of the interlocal agreement.
City Attorney Broome distributed a revised copy of the interlocal agreement to the
Council. He highlighted the revisions including new Section No. 7 that addressed
termination of the agreement. The section was added due to Council Member Long’s
concerns at the regular City Council meeting on September 27, 2011. City Attorney
Broome advised that the County Attorney expressed the new section was appropriate.
The next revision was made to Section No. 6 D, which read, “As a condition precedent to
the District Board’s expenditure of any funds from the City Account, the City must

approve the Economic Development Plan in its initial form and all amendments to such
plan.”
Member Long commented on Section No. 4. She also commented on whether the City
could put itself in a position of debt if it pledged future TIF revenue funds for future
bonds and payment of bond obligations if TIF revenues were not as expected.
Planning and Growth Management Director Courtney Barker advised the City would be
required to take over bond payment obligations, but as with the Community
Redevelopment Agency, it did not allow debt to exceed 50% of the obligations. The City
would be cognizant of these matters and the Council would have to approve such bonds.
Member Long clarified the rationale for having City staff provide the administrative
functions for the economic development zone interlocal agreement. She also expressed
concern on staff’s workload due to the scope of administrative responsibility was not yet
determined.
Planning and Growth Management Director Barker commented that Brevard County’s
main offices and the Economic Development Commission’s (EDC) office was in South
Brevard County. She expressed using local staff would provide continuity and
coordination by staff who worked locally, had knowledge of nearby properties, and
desired the growth of North Brevard County. Additionally, staff often collaborated and
participated in regional projects with other municipalities such as the Transportation
Planning Organization (TPO). Many projects were the result of regional collaboration.
The interlocal agreement would not be much different.
Vice-Mayor Johnson supported using local staff or City staff to provide administrative
support, which he believed would be advantageous and allow North Brevard to maintain
control of the funds allocated for North Brevard County. Furthermore, he advised there
was a precedence of regional collaboration. One example was Knight Armament.
Locally, the Space Coast Economic Development Commission (SEDC) worked and
collaborated with other organizations further away to bring this business to the north area
of the County.
Mayor Tulley clarified there were no public speaking cards submitted on the item.
Member Burson advised that she was uncomfortable with these issues due to the annual
SEDC contract renewal was not yet determined and the areas affected by the economic
development zone included areas other than the City.
Member Pritchett supported having City staff serve as the administrative support to the
economic development zone. Second, she commented that the word “may” could be used
in the proposed agreement to solve the issues related to staff support.
Mayor Tulley advised that staff’s administrative work requirement could be minimal for
the initial few years until the desired results of the economic development began to be

ealized. He recommended adding an equitable provision to the agreement that provided,
“At such time those funds become available the City staff time would be reimbursed by
the North Brevard Economic Development Zone.”
In Section No. 6, Mayor Tulley requested adding an additional paragraph that provided
and would “restrict the use of City funds to subsidize individual private enterprises
without explicit City Council approval.” He felt governments should support building
infrastructure and dollars that were used should be used for infrastructure that was
friendly to all businesses, not just one or a few.
Vice-Mayor Johnson commented on his understanding of Mayor Tulley’s request to add
a new paragraph under Section No. 6. He did not agree with the additional language
offered by Mayor Tulley as he felt that it would eliminate the economic development
process. Economic development required a variety of enticements.
Mayor Tulley felt there could be better methods to promote economic development that
did not involve competition. He desired the City or the North Brevard Area to be the
premier entrepreneurial incubation and start-up place for many new small businesses that
would synergize with one another and bring growth to the area. He also desired using
funds to leverage this type of activity. To express his ideas, Mayor Tulley advised that
the successful area of Silicon Valley in California began in this fashion.
Planning and Growth Management Director Barker offered a language amendment to the
proposed interlocal agreement, under Section No. 6, paragraph A, “The District Board
shall seek City Council approval of any cash expenditure exceeding $50,000 payable
annually from the City Account with the exception of cash incentives to a private
enterprise in which the entire expenditure must be approved by City Council.”
Mayor Tulley and Vice-Mayor Johnson supported the revised language recommendation
provided by Planning and Growth Management Barker.
Member Burson clarified how the recommended language offered by Planning and
Growth Management Director Barker would work.
Mayor Tulley requested City Attorney Broome restate the language amendment offered
by Planning and Growth Management Director Barker under Section No. 6, paragraph A.
City Attorney Broome advised the language included “The District Board shall seek City
Council approval of any cash expenditure exceeding $50,000 payable annually from the
City Account with the exception of cash incentives to a private enterprise, which shall
require the approval of City Council.”
Motion:
Member Pritchett moved to approve the proposed Interlocal Agreement with the County
and the City on the Economic Development Zone with the City Attorney’s changes, with
the amendment that Planning and Growth Management Director Barker read in Item

(Section) No. 6 A, and the amendment in Section No. 6 E, “The economic development
staff of the City, as designated by the City Manager, shall serve,,,”, and the City staff will
receive compensation from the County as the funds picked up.
Member Burson believed that Member Pritchett meant to use the words “may serve” in
Section No. 6 E. of her motion.
City Attorney Broome advised that he believed Member Pritchett intended to use the
word, “may”.
Mayor Tulley advised that he believed Member Pritchett did use the word “may”.
Vice-Mayor Johnson seconded the motion.
Member Long asked whether City Attorney Broome could offer a language change
suggestion to Section No. 4 that would permit the City to have the option whether it
would transfer TIF funds to the trust fund.
Under Section No. 4, in the first sentence, City Attorney Broome offered, “The City
agrees to annually review and approve the District’s budget concerning the expenditure
of City funds and transfer for deposit into the City Account that portion of the dedicated
increment value of ad valorem taxes determined under the City tax increment ordinance
as approved by the City.”
Member Long asked whether Member Pritchett would accept a friendly amendment to
the motion on the floor that provided that annually, the City would have a decision in the
TIF funds that would be transferred.
Member Pritchett declined the friendly amendment requested by Member Long.
Member Burson clarified how the trust fund would be organized and used according to
the terms in the proposed interlocal agreement.
Vice-Mayor Johnson read aloud Section No. 3; paragraph No. 2 in the proposed
agreement, which he believed would provide comfort to the Council. The language
provided the City would have control of its funds.
Mayor Tulley advised that the County would provide more funds than the City and he
was comfortable with the controls of the agreement, based on the motion made by
Member Pritchett.
Member Long advised that she would vote no on the pending motion due to she felt the
City did not have enough experience in making these types of agreements, there was no
plan, the Board was not yet established, there could be bonding and liability issues,
staff’s time would be required, etc.

The roll call was:
Member Pritchett
Vice-Mayor Johnson
Mayor Tulley
Member Long
Member Burson
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
The motion carried 4-1 with Member Long in objection.
xxx
Petitions and Requests from the Public Present (Open Forum) –
Giles Malone advised that he was a chair of the Brevard County Tourism and
Development Council and a partner of a company that produced special events. He
advised that his company produced successful quality events and his company owned the
Space Coast State Fair event, which he proposed to hold at Sand Point Park in Titusville
on November 10-13 and November 17-20, 2011. He commented on the events of the fair,
the anticipated attendance on the various days the fair would be held, parking, busing in
senior citizens, student volunteers, admission prices, etc.
Mayor Tulley clarified where and how Mr. Malone proposed to hold several of the fair’s
events including the motor-cross show, concerts, etc.
Acting City Manager Abbate advised that staff was working with Mr. Malone’s company
and Brevard County to address the proposal of holding the Space Coast State Fair at Sand
Point Park. It was summarized that a site plan, a memo of understanding, limiting the fair
to five days, security, costs, etc. were items that were still pending and being addressed.
Mayor Tulley clarified the number of days that Mr. Malone wished to hold the fair was
reduced from eleven days to eight days, in order for it to be financially feasible for the
company who owned the fair business, which was North America Midway
Entertainment.
Member Pritchett clarified whether it was possible to allow Mr. Malone to hold the fair
for eight days and any impacts that could result. She and Member Long supported
holding the fair in Titusville.
Member Burson clarified the fair’s proposed schedule, Mr. Malone’s experience with fair
company contractors and certain fair events, her concern for fair animals, and what the
details of the fair’s events included. She also supported working with the fair
representatives and encouraged having the fair held in the City.
Vice-Mayor Johnson clarified the Birds of Prey exhibit was the Wilson’s Birds of Prey
show.

Planning and Growth Management Director Courtney Barker clarified that Mr. Malone
was agreeable with the costs required by the Police and Fire Departments.
Acting City Manager Abbate advised staff would report back to Council once the various
aspects were addressed including a site plan, memo of understanding that addressed
responsibilities and costs, etc.
North Brevard County Parks and Recreation Commission Director Terry Lane
highlighted the few permits that were required by the County and the City for the event
and that he would attend the upcoming Council meeting when the Space Coast State Fair
was a scheduled agenda item.
xxx
Curt Leady felt that the objectives and work by the Citizens’ Budget Advisory
Committee was misunderstood. He desired to come back at a future Council meeting
where the Council would discuss the committee, to speak on its behalf.
Mayor and Council Reports:
Mayor James H. Tulley, Jr. Report – Mayor Tulley provided a written report.
xxx
xxx
Mayor Tulley advised that he recently attended a Florida League of Cities legislative
committee meeting on growth management. There, a legal matter regarding another
Florida city’s bonding of public infrastructure based on a development project was
discussed. He advised that he shared the information with the Legal Department upon his
return.
xxx
Regarding the Space Coast Economic Development Commission (SEDC), Mayor Tulley
advised that since there were not too many members in his opinion, he visited each of
them personally to get their input on Council’s recent discussion of the organization. He
wanted to get this input before Council discussed the SEDC at their future meetings.
xxx
North Brevard Commission on Parks & Recreation - Council Member Rita Pritchett -
Member Pritchett advised that at the North Brevard Parks & Recreation meeting held on
September 8, 2011, the Commission discussed an upcoming race at the Chain of Lakes
Park with an incredible turnout of runners expected, and upcoming mullet festival, a state
fair in the City in November, a crafts show at Fox Lake Park on November 19, 2011, and
trees that were planted in the dog area at Marina Park.

xxx
Student Advsiory Council - Council Member Rita Pritchett - Member Pritchett advised
that at the Student Advisory meeting held on September 18, 2011, a new member was
introduced and the students discussed and worked on a plan to hold a leadership seminar
in 2012. She advised the members on the Student Advisory Council were very bright and
enthusiastic about their projects. She would report back to Council with more details
about the upcoming student leadership seminar as they were revealed.
xxx
City Manager’s Report – Acting City Manager submitted City Manager Mark Ryan’s
report.
xxx
Establishment of City Council Workshops/Special Meetings – Four subjects were listed
on the City Manager’s Report that Council previously expressed holding special meetings
on. These were
• Medicare Supplemental Insurance for Municipal Retirees
• Planned Industrial Development Regulations
• Riverfront Acquisition
• Space Coast Economic Development Commission
Acting City Manager Abbate advised that at the regular City council meeting on
September 27, 2011 at 6:30 p.m., the Council authorized a special meeting on October
18, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the Space Coast Economic Development Commission
(SEDC). He requested whether the Council desired authorizing additional special
meetings to discuss the remainder of these subjects.
Mayor Tulley clarified that the employee benefits consulting firm of Bush Robinson was
working on the Medicare issue and it would be wise to wait for their pending report.
Vice-Mayor Johnson recommended combining the Planned Industrial Development
Regulations and the SEDC at the previously scheduled meeting on October 18, 2011 at
5:30 p.m.
Mayor Tulley summarized that Council seemed agreeable with Vice-Mayor Johnson’s
recommendation. He also commented that there were many pressing issues and the
opportunity to discuss the Riverfront Acquisition would have to wait until other issues
were addressed.
Member Pritchett recommended focusing on cost saving opportunities with Medicare
supplemental insurance early in the process, not when the annual renewal was due to
occur.
xxx

Titusville Housing Authority – Acting City Manager Abbate advised that included in the
agenda package was correspondence from Mr. Bob Lambert, Executive Director of the
Housing Authority of the City of Titusville indicating that Housing Authority Board
Members Judith Pobjecky and Keith Cox have resigned. These resignations reduced the
membership of the Titusville Housing Authority Board to five members. Mr. Lambert
inquired whether the Mayor and City Council desired soliciting applications to appoint
new members to the Housing Authority or allow the membership of the board to be
reduced to five members.
Mayor Tulley commented on a recent discussion that he had with Mr. Lambert. He
desired bringing in two new members to mitigate any other members who could resign in
future years due to they had been serving a while. The rest of Council supported Mayor
Tulley’s recommendation.
Mayor Tulley requested the two vacant member positions on the Titusville Housing
Authority to be advertised. There was no objection from Council.
City Manager Evaluation Process – Deferred until City Manager Ryan returned.
The following were for informational items:
xxx
xxx
• Response to FY 2012 Budget Public Hearing Advertisement Issue
• Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for the
Canaveral National Seashore
• 2011 Florida League of Cities Legislative Conference - November 17 - 18, 2011,
at the Hyatt Regency Orlando International Airport Hotel.
• Marina Park Enhancement
• Max Brewer Causeway Bridge Enhancement
• State Road 50 Milling and Resurfacing Project
• Willow Creek Community Development District Meeting Program
• Open House Party Legislation
• Interim Fire Chief - Mike Woodward, Operations Chief in the Titusville Fire &
Emergency Services
• Titusville Municipal Marina – NPDES Inspection
• FY 2011-2012 CDBG & HOME Action Plan
• Boards and Commissions Recognition Ceremony - Tuesday, December 6, 2011,
La Cita Country Club, 6:30 p.m.
Mayor Tulley commented on the State Road 50 Milling and Resurfacing Project and
asked whether there was any concern regarding the plans to eliminate on-street parking
and install a bike lane as part of the project. Acting City Manager Abbate advised that he
or City Manager Ryan would report back with the information requested.

Member Burson requested knowing whether there were any businesses that were
concerned with the removal of the on-street parking within the State Road 50 Milling and
Resurfacing Project.
Mayor Tulley advised that he did not know the details whether there were any businesses
that were concerned with the removal of the on-street parking within the State Road 50
Milling and Resurfacing Project.
xxx
Member Burson asked what Council knew about the Willow-Creek Community
Development District and its development plans. She believed the community was
already subdivided and it was an ongoing development district for sometime.
Mayor Tulley advised the Willow-Creek Community Development District had a district
board that held regular meetings.
Vice-Mayor Johnson advised this development district was formed sometime ago in
anticipation of having a developer come in and develop the area. To date, this had not
occurred and the Willow-Creek Community Development District Board was
maintaining the original intention until the property could later be developed. Each year,
on an annual basis, Willow Creek Community Development District was required to
report to the City.
xxx
Member Pritchett clarified what she or the Council could do or prepare for an upcoming
issue related to the on the regulation of internet gambling cafés.
xxx
With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 7:38 p.m.
xxx
ATTEST:
______________________________
James H. Tulley, Jr., Mayor
__________________________________
Wanda F. Wells, City Clerk