15.11.2014 Views

c-Si PVMC Brief Overview

c-Si PVMC Brief Overview

c-Si PVMC Brief Overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> <strong>Brief</strong> <strong>Overview</strong><br />

Intersolar NA –San Francisco, CA<br />

Dr. Winston V. Schoenfeld<br />

Director, c‐<strong>Si</strong> PVCM<br />

July 10 th , 2012<br />

The data contained in all slides of this presentation is protected data produced under agreement no. DE‐EE0004947 with the<br />

U.S. Department of Energy and may not be published, disseminated, or disclosed to others outside the Government until five (5)<br />

years from the date the data was produced, unless express written authorization is obtained from the recipient. Upon<br />

expiration of the period of protection set forth in this Notice, the Government shall have unlimited rights in this data. This<br />

Notice shall be marked on any reproduction of this data, in whole or in part.


DOE SunShot Initiative<br />

• Mission of DOE SunShot Initiative<br />

- Deliver grid-parity solar PV by 2020, a goal that will demand<br />

~75% reduction in the cost of systems compared with today<br />

- Restore US leadership in the global clean energy race<br />

• SunShot Photovoltaic Manufacturing Initiative (PVMI) - $110M<br />

• PV Cells / Modules – 3 recipients<br />

Balance of System<br />

Power Electronics<br />

• April 2011 – award recipients of solar cell/module<br />

- Industry-led consortium, SEMATECH – <strong>PVMC</strong><br />

Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) pilot line, in partnership with CNSE<br />

c-<strong>Si</strong> metrology and feedstock/wafering technologies, in partnership with UCF/FSEC in Florida<br />

- PV manufacturing development facility – SVTC<br />

- University-led consortium – BAPVC (Stanford/Berkeley)<br />

U.S. Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium (<strong>PVMC</strong>)<br />

Consortium<br />

Management<br />

CIGS<br />

c‐<strong>Si</strong><br />

2


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Program Areas<br />

& Structure


Initial c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Program Areas<br />

1. In‐line/Off‐line Metrology<br />

Primary Goals<br />

– Identify critical industry challenges/needs in metrology and rank<br />

– Participate and support c‐<strong>Si</strong> standards development and roadmapping efforts<br />

– Develop projects to demonstrate new c‐<strong>Si</strong> metrology technologies<br />

– Build infrastructure to support metrology programs<br />

– Transition new metrology technologies into pilot and manufacturing lines<br />

Courtesy of Polaritek<br />

2. New Feedstock/Wafering Methodologies<br />

Primary Goals<br />

– Identify critical industry needs in feedstock and metrology<br />

Courtesy of AMAT<br />

– Establish c‐<strong>Si</strong> feedstock/wafering programs to accelerate transition of new technologies into mainstream manufacturing<br />

– Provide/foster process, test, and demonstration activities to validate new technologies and identify barriers<br />

– Participate and support c‐<strong>Si</strong> standards development and roadmapping efforts


The c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Organizational Structure<br />

‐ Oversight of all c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> programs and personnel<br />

‐ Strategic planning and expansion<br />

‐ Management of program areas<br />

‐ Coordination of program area<br />

activities<br />

Program Area Oversight<br />

‐ Sets Program Area priorities<br />

‐ Selects consortium projects and resource allocation<br />

‐ Reviews program area directions/deliverables/milestones<br />

‐ Populated by Consortium Members<br />

Project Area Oversight<br />

‐ Identifies potential Program Area projects<br />

‐ Ranks potential Projects through Pareto analysis<br />

‐ Sets Project goals/metrics/deliverables<br />

‐ Carries out Project tasks, populated with Assignees<br />

‐ Leads Roadmapping and Standards Development<br />

Key Point: Programs are initiated, monitored, and measured by <strong>PVMC</strong> members


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Activities Timeline<br />

Identify Challenges<br />

Identify Projects<br />

Select<br />

Projects


c‐<strong>Si</strong> Challenges Pareto Results<br />

Identify Challenges<br />

Identify Projects<br />

Select<br />

Projects


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Challenges Pareto Effort<br />

Code<br />

W-C1<br />

W-C2<br />

W-C3<br />

W-C4<br />

Wafer Production Area Challenges<br />

Thin wafers handling and processing (e.g. limiting breakage); Thin wafer<br />

interconnection; Test methods or a specific handling target to<br />

characterizate/validate handling for thin wafers; Pre-processing, handling, and<br />

packaging/shipment of thin wafers to cell manufacturer<br />

Slurry recycling<br />

Reduction of kerf loss<br />

Unified incoming wafer specifications and standards; Better specifications for<br />

mechanical and electrical characterization (Affects cell effiency & end product<br />

performance)<br />

Grain boundary passivation of multicrystalline <strong>Si</strong> wafers<br />

W-C5<br />

W-C6 Determination of electrical activity of crystallographic defects in a wafer<br />

W-C7 Understanding critical crack lengths vs. wafer thickness<br />

W-C8 Wafer consistancy<br />

Lack of detailed information from customers (only pass/fail info given); Lack of<br />

W-C9<br />

US based solar companies for partnerships<br />

W-C10 Saw damage removal and surface characterization<br />

New wafering technologies (kerf-free, implan/cleave, direct wafer technology ,<br />

W-C11<br />

etc.); Lower cost SOI wafers<br />

W-C12 Correlation of reliability/degradation mechanisms to wafer quality/properties<br />

Decoupling bulk and surface recombination in carrier lifetime measurement;<br />

W-C13 Carrier lifetime measurements at the wafer level, better prediction of cell<br />

efficency<br />

In-line inspection of wafers; Determine optimal scan density and cost versus<br />

W-C14<br />

need (value-cost curve)<br />

Unknown impact of new wafer formats (ex. quasi-mono wafers, n-type wafers,<br />

W-C15<br />

etc.) on cleaning and texturing processes<br />

<strong>PVMC</strong> Confidential –Not for reproduction/distribution without written permission from <strong>PVMC</strong>‐FL


c‐<strong>Si</strong> Potential Projects Pareto Results –<br />

Effort undertaken after Challenges<br />

Pareto<br />

Identify Challenges<br />

Identify Projects<br />

Select<br />

Projects


M‐P1<br />

Goals and Main<br />

Objectives<br />

Expected Duration<br />

Challenge Addressed<br />

<strong>Brief</strong> Description<br />

Example Metrology Project Description<br />

Improved methods of characterizing mechanical integrity of wafers/cells and<br />

identifying wafers that might lead to high breakage<br />

• More reliably detect what wafers/cells might lead to cracks before, during and<br />

after processing (i.e. go/no‐go criteria)<br />

• Gain further understanding of the key process steps and handling issues that<br />

induce cracks (externally applied stress)<br />

• Improve accuracy and reliability of residual stress/strain and crack detection<br />

measurements for various sample types<br />

• Develop in‐line methods for measuring elastic properties of wafers/cells<br />

• Improved manufacturing yield for thin and standard thickness wafers/cells<br />

• Potential β‐site demonstration of in‐line cell metrology tool(s)<br />

2‐3 years<br />

Primary: W‐C1, W‐C7, FW‐C7, FW‐C8, C‐C1, M‐C8, MCC‐C7, MCC‐C10<br />

Secondary: W‐C4, W‐C12, W‐C14, FCC‐C5, C‐C6, C‐C12, MCC‐C4, MCC‐C8<br />

A statistically relevant number of incoming wafers (thin and standard thickness) are<br />

processed in lots with various process parameters and handling methods, with in‐line<br />

measurements (RUV, optical) performed at various points (beforehand and during<br />

critical process/handling steps). Failures are inspected using established off‐line<br />

methods (SAM, X‐ray based, optical, Kelvin probe). Stress tests (thermal cycling,<br />

mechanical impact, test‐to‐failure methods) are carried out on cells along with<br />

additional characterization. Models are developed and refined to provide go/no‐go<br />

criteria for breakage. A smaller sample size of wafers is fully characterized before,<br />

during and after processing to more thoroughly investigate the evolution of the<br />

stress/strain profiles throughout processing and refine models.<br />

Challenges in RED were among top three challenges for that production area.<br />

<strong>PVMC</strong> Confidential –Not for reproduction/distribution without written permission from <strong>PVMC</strong>


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Potential Projects Pareto Effort<br />

<strong>PVMC</strong> Confidential –Not for reproduction/distribution without written permission from <strong>PVMC</strong>


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Membership<br />

Identify Challenges<br />

Identify Projects<br />

Select<br />

Projects


Membership Process Timeline


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Membership Levels<br />

Two Membership Levels:<br />

– Full Members<br />

• TAB seat in both Program Areas<br />

• Working Group Participation<br />

• Access to/participation in all Program Areas (Metrology,<br />

Feedstock/Wafering, etc.)<br />

• Full IP access<br />

– Program Members<br />

• TAB Participation in designated Program Area (Designated in Attachment<br />

A of Participant Agreement)<br />

• Working Group Participation in designated Program Area<br />

• Access to/participation in designated Program Area<br />

• IP access within designated Program Area


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Calendar of Events


2012 c‐<strong>Si</strong> US <strong>PVMC</strong> Events Calendar<br />

Date Event Format Amplification<br />

JAN 1/11 and 1/12 Kick-off meetings WebEx/telecon Identify/list key challenges<br />

FEB<br />

2/1 and 2/2 Follow-up Meetings WebEx/telecon Review Pareto results for challenges<br />

2/7/2012 Conference - Washington, DC DOE Metrology Workshop Networking<br />

MAR 3/7 and 3/8 Working Group Face to face meeting Identify projects for Pareto analysis<br />

4/12/2012 Working Group WebEx/telecon Review Pareto and provide comments<br />

APR<br />

NREL-<strong>PVMC</strong> Projects<br />

4/25/2012 John Wohlgemuth - NREL WebEx/telecon<br />

Review Papers/Standards<br />

5/3/2012 SEMATECH-<strong>PVMC</strong> Meeting Face to face meeting Progress Status<br />

MAY<br />

5/7/2012 Carl Osterwald - NREL WebEx/telecon Standards<br />

5/8/2012 Larry Sherwood – Solar ABCs WebEx/telecon Standards<br />

5/25/2012 Workshop Committee WebEx/telecon Select Technical Program<br />

JUN<br />

6/6/2012<br />

Standards kick-off meetings<br />

Conference - Austin, TX<br />

IEEE PVSC<br />

5pm – 8:30pm<br />

Networking<br />

Working Group WebEx/telecon Project execution and review<br />

6/13 and 6/14<br />

DOE Forum Poster session Showcase c-<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong><br />

7/10<br />

Feedstock/Wafering Workshop<br />

7/11 Conference – San Francisco, CA<br />

Intersolar NA<br />

Networking<br />

7/12<br />

Metrology Workshop<br />

JUL<br />

7/25/12<br />

Conference - Vail, CO<br />

Roadmap kick-off meeting<br />

7/25/12<br />

NREL c-<strong>Si</strong> Workshop<br />

Networking<br />

7/26/12<br />

Golden, CO<br />

NREL Visit<br />

AUG 8/8 and 8/9 Working Group WebEx/telecon Project execution and review<br />

9/10/12<br />

Face to face meetings<br />

SEP to<br />

Conference - Orlando, FL Solar Power International<br />

SDOs Forum<br />

9/13/12<br />

Networking<br />

OCT 10/10 and 10/11 Working Group WebEx/telecon Project execution and review<br />

NOV 11/14 and 11/15 Working Group WebEx/telecon Project execution and review<br />

DEC 12/12 and 12/13 Working Group WebEx/telecon Project execution and review


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Standards Kick‐off Meeting<br />

IEEE PVSC – Austin, TX – Wednesday 6/7/2012 5pm – 8:30pm<br />

• Q: How can we better integrate c‐<strong>Si</strong> US<strong>PVMC</strong> standard efforts with<br />

existing SDO activities –What is its role?<br />

– c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Role: Participate, not re‐create!<br />

– Invited representatives from SDOs to participate<br />

• >30 Participant Attended/Actively Participated<br />

– SEMI, IEC, ASTM, Solar ABCs, NREL, UL, and Industry<br />

• Discussion Topics<br />

– <strong>Overview</strong> of existing SDOs/WGs/TFs/standards potentially<br />

related to c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Programs<br />

– Identify gaps in standards that c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> can facilitate<br />

– Identify specific ways c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> can engage w/ SDOs


c‐<strong>Si</strong> Report Generated to Document Findings/AIs<br />

• Documents attendees, discussions, findings, and action items.


c‐<strong>Si</strong> <strong>PVMC</strong> Roadmaps Kick‐off Meeting<br />

NREL c‐<strong>Si</strong> Workshop at Vail, CO<br />

Wednesday 7/25/2012 1pm –4pm<br />

• Identify and discuss existing c‐<strong>Si</strong> roadmaps<br />

– Which ones are out there?<br />

– Who owns them?<br />

• Do they cover the two program areas appropriately? Identify<br />

potential gaps/needs<br />

• Discuss what elements are key in making a roadmap attractive<br />

to the industry so that it is accepted and embraced by<br />

industry

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!