61 landed at Monterey surpassed 200,000 tons in ... - City of Monterey
61 landed at Monterey surpassed 200,000 tons in ... - City of Monterey
61 landed at Monterey surpassed 200,000 tons in ... - City of Monterey
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
<strong>landed</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>surpassed</strong> <strong>200</strong>,<strong>000</strong> <strong>tons</strong> <strong>in</strong> the 1934‐35, 1936‐37 and 1939‐40 seasons, reach<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
height <strong>of</strong> more than 250,<strong>000</strong> <strong>tons</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1941‐1942 season. By the l<strong>at</strong>e 1930s, only Hull, England<br />
and Stavanger, Norway ranked ahead <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> worldwide <strong>in</strong> tonnage <strong>of</strong> processed fish. 105<br />
The ongo<strong>in</strong>g expansion <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry ended abruptly <strong>in</strong> the mid‐1940s. The 1944‐45 c<strong>at</strong>ch was<br />
237,<strong>000</strong> <strong>tons</strong>, the second largest ever recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. Unexpectedly, the c<strong>at</strong>ch fell by nearly 40<br />
percent the next year, to 145,<strong>000</strong> <strong>tons</strong>, before dropp<strong>in</strong>g precipitously to 31,<strong>000</strong> <strong>tons</strong> for the 1946‐47<br />
season. Though overfish<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>ly played an important role <strong>in</strong> the phenomenal decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ion, more recent research <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> additional factors played a role, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the chang<strong>in</strong>g ocean tides and temper<strong>at</strong>ure, as well as the n<strong>at</strong>ural cycle <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>es’ migr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
p<strong>at</strong>tern. Regardless <strong>of</strong> the reasons, the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry was precipitous. By 19<strong>61</strong>, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
31 plants <strong>in</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1949‐1950 season, only five rema<strong>in</strong>ed. The last sard<strong>in</strong>e c<strong>at</strong>ch was<br />
packed <strong>in</strong> 1964, by which time the <strong>in</strong>dustry’s annual <strong>in</strong>take had dropped to a few hundred <strong>tons</strong>. 106<br />
Figure 9‐3. 1907 panorama show<strong>in</strong>g area from Tyler Street east to the Southern Pacific tra<strong>in</strong> depot <strong>at</strong> Adams Street<br />
largely empty. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Sanborns, the series <strong>of</strong> gabled sheds along Tyler Street were used as bo<strong>at</strong> storage<br />
(Coventry 42‐43) (courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
The Return <strong>of</strong> the Military to <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
In the first years <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, <strong>in</strong> the wake <strong>of</strong> the Spanish American War, President<br />
Roosevelt and his cab<strong>in</strong>et planned a series <strong>of</strong> modern military bases for the West Coast to help<br />
safeguard the county’s imperialist policies. In 1902, <strong>Monterey</strong> was selected to host one <strong>of</strong> the bases, and<br />
the Colonel Henry T. Ward and two companies <strong>of</strong> 15th Infantry Regiment took over the <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Military Reserv<strong>at</strong>ion and were soon jo<strong>in</strong>ed by the 1st Squadron, 9th Cavalry, a unit <strong>of</strong> the African‐<br />
American “Buffalo Soldiers.”<br />
The U.S. Army proceeded to build a new fort known <strong>of</strong>ficially for a short time as Ord Barracks. In 1903,<br />
Colonel Ward announced th<strong>at</strong> the public was <strong>in</strong>vited to <strong>at</strong>tend the concerts, parades, drills and troop<br />
form<strong>at</strong>ions, a tradition th<strong>at</strong> would cont<strong>in</strong>ue until <strong>200</strong>1. On August 30, 1904, the military grounds were<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficially design<strong>at</strong>ed the Presidio <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. At the time, the Presidio housed approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 1,<strong>000</strong><br />
soldiers, compris<strong>in</strong>g about one‐fourth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>’s total popul<strong>at</strong>ion. From the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, the city<br />
recognized the economic impact <strong>of</strong> the nearby base, with local merchants eagerly await<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
servicemen’s paydays. 107<br />
105 Conway, 108; Hemp, 56, 109; Walton, 195.<br />
106 Conway, 130‐131; Hemp, 14, 82‐83, 109.<br />
107 Conway, 97, 99, 101‐2.<br />
<strong>61</strong>
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
In its early years, the Presidio hosted a number <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g facilities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a marksmanship school, a<br />
cook<strong>in</strong>g school, an auto mechanics school, and a communic<strong>at</strong>ions school. The 15th Infantry was<br />
replaced by the 20th Infantry <strong>in</strong> 1906, which was sent almost immedi<strong>at</strong>ely to San Francisco to provide<br />
emergency assistance follow<strong>in</strong>g the Gre<strong>at</strong> Earthquake and Fire. The 9th Cavalry was replaced <strong>in</strong> 1904 by<br />
the 1st Cavalry. To provide a larger maneuver area for the military <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> area, the Army<br />
purchased almost 16,<strong>000</strong> acres from David Jacks <strong>in</strong> 1917, and named it the Gigl<strong>in</strong>g Military<br />
Reserv<strong>at</strong>ion. 108<br />
Figure 9‐4. Alvarado Street, view look<strong>in</strong>g south, 1901. The <strong>Monterey</strong> and Pacific Grove Street Railway l<strong>in</strong>e is visible<br />
to the right (courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
Early Twentieth Century Residential and Commercial Expansion<br />
The rise <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry and return <strong>of</strong> the military triggered a residential build<strong>in</strong>g boom <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Monterey</strong>. 109 The city’s popul<strong>at</strong>ion nearly tripled <strong>in</strong> the first decade <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, from 1,748<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1900 to 4,932 <strong>in</strong> 1910. Though the r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease slowed, steady growth pushed <strong>Monterey</strong>’s<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ion over 10,<strong>000</strong> by 1940. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>’s neighborhoods were subdivided <strong>in</strong> the early years<br />
<strong>of</strong> the century and, by World War II, were built out with s<strong>in</strong>gle family homes for fishermen and cannery<br />
workers. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>’s Italian fishermen settled <strong>in</strong> the hill on the south side <strong>of</strong> the Presidio, which<br />
came to be known as “Garlic Hill.” 110<br />
108 Conway, 101; Nomell<strong>in</strong>i, II‐30.<br />
109 Archives & Architecture, 11.<br />
110 Conway, 106.<br />
62
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 9‐5. Alvarado and Ma<strong>in</strong> Streets (l<strong>at</strong>er Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal), 1907, look<strong>in</strong>g south from Custom House. The railway<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e was electrified <strong>in</strong> 1903 (courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
The city’s flourish<strong>in</strong>g economy also spurred a significant build<strong>in</strong>g boom on Alvarado Street <strong>in</strong> the first<br />
years <strong>of</strong> the century, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g construction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Hotel (1904), the First N<strong>at</strong>ional Bank <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> (1904), the Ordway Block Build<strong>in</strong>g (1905), the Goldst<strong>in</strong>e Block Build<strong>in</strong>g (1906), M. Ort<strong>in</strong>’s<br />
Block (1910), the <strong>Monterey</strong> Investment Company Build<strong>in</strong>g (1910), the A.R. Underwood Build<strong>in</strong>g (1912),<br />
and the Regency The<strong>at</strong>er (1917). Many <strong>of</strong> these were designed by prolific Bay Area architect William H.<br />
Weeks, who also designed several other build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>at</strong> this time, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
First Presbyterian Church (1910) <strong>at</strong> 398 Pacific Street and the public library (1910) <strong>at</strong> 425 Van Buren<br />
Street. Reflect<strong>in</strong>g its grow<strong>in</strong>g importance, Alvarado Street was paved and outfitted with electric lamps <strong>in</strong><br />
1911. 111<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the ground‐floor shops <strong>in</strong> these grand new build<strong>in</strong>gs c<strong>at</strong>ered to fishermen, cannery workers,<br />
and their families. Alvarado Street, especially the block north <strong>of</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street (known as “Lower<br />
Alvarado”) was a major g<strong>at</strong>her<strong>in</strong>g place for Italian and Portuguese fishermen and their families. The V‐<br />
shaped park <strong>at</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tersection <strong>of</strong> Alvarado Street and Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal, complete with a founta<strong>in</strong> for dogs,<br />
was the center <strong>of</strong> social activity, most prom<strong>in</strong>ently on Sundays when the fishermen and their families<br />
walked along the wharf area. With the Booth Cannery loc<strong>at</strong>ed just beyond the Custom House,<br />
Fisherman would congreg<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> the Custom House <strong>in</strong> the early morn<strong>in</strong>g hours before sett<strong>in</strong>g out on the<br />
bay. 112<br />
111 Howard (1996), 16.<br />
112 Howard (1996), 17‐8; Karas, 8‐9. The Booth Cannery warehouse was removed <strong>in</strong> 1931.<br />
63
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 9‐6. c. 1910 photo <strong>of</strong> Duarte & Sons Fish Market on Alvarado Street between Dec<strong>at</strong>ur and Scott Streets<br />
(courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
Lower Alvarado was also close to two thriv<strong>in</strong>g wharves. The Pacific Coast Steamship Company had<br />
constructed the first wharf, now known as Fisherman’s Wharf, <strong>in</strong> 1870 for the load<strong>in</strong>g and unload<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
passengers and goods. The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> assumed ownership <strong>of</strong> this wharf <strong>in</strong> 1913, and expanded it<br />
throughout the rema<strong>in</strong>der <strong>of</strong> the decade. In 1926, the <strong>City</strong> completed a second wharf, the New<br />
Municipal Wharf (now known as Wharf #2), th<strong>at</strong> extended from Figueroa Street. The warehouse <strong>at</strong> the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the wharf d<strong>at</strong>es from this time.<br />
Few adobes rema<strong>in</strong>ed along Alvarado Street by the early years <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. In 1922‐23, the<br />
1835 Bonifacio Adobe was removed from its loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> 425 Alvarado Street, disassembled, and rebuilt<br />
as the Sherman Rose Cottage <strong>in</strong> the Alta Mesa neighborhood. By the 1940s, the only rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g adobes<br />
on Alvarado Street were the Osio‐Rodriguez Adobe, the Alvarado Adobe and Casa Sanchez. 113<br />
Despite the area’s significant growth <strong>in</strong> the first decades <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, downtown <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
did not <strong>in</strong>clude a sizeable public park until the development <strong>of</strong> Friendly Plaza <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>at</strong>e 1930s. The<br />
parcels northeast <strong>of</strong> Colton Hall, owned by the Jacks family, had long hosted several small dwell<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
These parcels were cleared and the Jacks family deeded the parcels to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>in</strong> May 1929. In 1930,<br />
local artist (and resident <strong>of</strong> nearby Casa de la Torre) Myron Oliver designed Friendly Plaza, which<br />
extended along Pacific Street from Jefferson Street to the northern edge <strong>of</strong> the lawn <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> Colton<br />
113 Delk<strong>in</strong>, 65.<br />
64
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Hall. The park was constructed with Works Progress Adm<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ion (WPA) funds <strong>in</strong> 1936‐37, follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> Few Memorial Hall. 114<br />
As the Alvarado corridor cont<strong>in</strong>ued to develop, a dist<strong>in</strong>ction emerged between Lower Alvarado and<br />
Upper Alvarado, with Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street the divid<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e. Both sections <strong>in</strong>cluded a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial establishments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g restaurants, confectioneries, tailor shops, butcher shops,<br />
hardware stores, barber shops, and drug stores. By the 1920s, however, Lower Alvarado was also home<br />
to several cigar stores, card rooms and billiard halls. The dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the two areas <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>ds<br />
<strong>of</strong> government <strong>of</strong>ficials and the public would grow starker <strong>in</strong> the years to come. 115<br />
Figure 9‐7. Portion <strong>of</strong> 1927 panorama show<strong>in</strong>g lower downtown and the end <strong>of</strong> the New Wharf (A.C. Heidrick,<br />
photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
114 Clipp<strong>in</strong>g files, “Friendly Plaza,” <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room.<br />
115 Burton‐Carvajal, 50‐52; Howard (<strong>200</strong>7), A; Howard (1996), 18; Karas, 13.<br />
65
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 9‐8. “Map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 1926.” by Howard Severance (courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library,<br />
California History Room).<br />
66
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own<br />
The easternmost portion <strong>of</strong> the downtown survey area, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the blocks east <strong>of</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton and<br />
Abrego Streets to Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero, were largely undeveloped until the 1920s. The 1912 Sanborn Map<br />
extends eastward to Adams Street north <strong>of</strong> Pearl Street and to Figueroa Street south <strong>of</strong> Pearl Street.<br />
There was no coverage <strong>of</strong> the blocks extend<strong>in</strong>g eastward to Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero, imply<strong>in</strong>g the area was<br />
home to little significant development. Based on the 1912 map, the blocks between Abrego and<br />
Figueroa Streets were sparsely popul<strong>at</strong>ed with about 30 dwell<strong>in</strong>gs and associ<strong>at</strong>ed structures.<br />
The 1912 Sanborn Map shows a small Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own centered <strong>at</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Streets. While<br />
the primary Ch<strong>in</strong>ese settlement <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> was loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t Alones just west <strong>of</strong> town, several<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese laundries had formed a small downtown Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own <strong>at</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton and Frankl<strong>in</strong> Streets by the<br />
l<strong>at</strong>e 1800s. Initially, the Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own served Ch<strong>in</strong>ese gardeners, cooks and other staff employed <strong>at</strong> the Del<br />
Monte Hotel, and many employees with families settled <strong>in</strong> the downtown Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own (Del Monte<br />
employees without families typically lived on the hotel grounds). Follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1906 fire th<strong>at</strong> destroyed<br />
the Po<strong>in</strong>t Alones fish<strong>in</strong>g village, several fishermen and their families moved to the Frankl<strong>in</strong>/Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own. Other families moved to the new village <strong>at</strong> McAbee Beach but worked <strong>in</strong> the downtown<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own. 116<br />
Figure 9‐9. c. 1920 map <strong>of</strong> small Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own <strong>at</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Streets <strong>in</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> (source:<br />
Lydon, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Gold, 389).<br />
116 Lydon (1985), 387‐390.<br />
67
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Though known as Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own, the Frankl<strong>in</strong>/Wash<strong>in</strong>gton area was home to both Ch<strong>in</strong>ese and Japanese<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses and residents. In fact, the area hosted the second largest Japantown <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> County;<br />
only W<strong>at</strong>sonville’s was larger. Japanese residents <strong>of</strong> the area were mostly fisherman. 117<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong>’s Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own changed significantly <strong>in</strong> the first years <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, as the<br />
development and occup<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the new Presidio brought hundreds <strong>of</strong> U.S. Army troops to the<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. Nicknamed “The Badlands,” the area hosted several Ch<strong>in</strong>ese‐owned gambl<strong>in</strong>g halls<br />
and houses <strong>of</strong> prostitution p<strong>at</strong>ronized by local servicemen. In the l<strong>at</strong>e n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, the gambl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
halls <strong>in</strong> the area c<strong>at</strong>ered primarily to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese p<strong>at</strong>rons. By the 1920s, however, most <strong>of</strong> the gamblers <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own were not Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. The only build<strong>in</strong>g associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the downtown Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own th<strong>at</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />
is the Japanese American Citizens League Hall (1926) <strong>at</strong> 424 Adams Street. 118<br />
The Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision<br />
The blocks south <strong>of</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street between Figueroa Street and Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero were orig<strong>in</strong>ally known<br />
as the Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision, which was pl<strong>at</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> 1897 and appears on the 1901 map <strong>of</strong> Old town<br />
completed by Walter Colton Little. The subdivision was named for William Dobb<strong>in</strong> Rob<strong>in</strong>son, who<br />
owned much <strong>of</strong> the area by the l<strong>at</strong>e 1800s. Pearl Street was extended and realigned east <strong>of</strong> Figueroa<br />
Street to accommod<strong>at</strong>e the Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision. Pearl Street and the adjacent land was raised with<br />
several feet <strong>of</strong> fill to accommod<strong>at</strong>e the storm dra<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e under the street through which Hartnell Creek<br />
now empties <strong>in</strong>to El Estero. By 1910 the Gould‐Bush Realty Company had acquired portions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
subdivision and was sell<strong>in</strong>g lots. 119<br />
Substantial improvements were needed to foster development <strong>in</strong> this marshy area. In 1924, contractor<br />
J.C. Anthony filled <strong>in</strong> the southwestern edge <strong>of</strong> the Estero with dirt excav<strong>at</strong>ed from the site <strong>of</strong> the Hotel<br />
Del Monte expansion. Two years l<strong>at</strong>er, the <strong>City</strong> filled <strong>in</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the Estero’s western edge for the<br />
cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero. 120<br />
By 1926, the blocks between Del Monte Avenue and Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street were occupied by <strong>in</strong>dustrial uses:<br />
the block north <strong>of</strong> today’s Jacks Park was occupied by the Coast Valleys Gas and Electric Company<br />
facility, while the block <strong>at</strong> the southwest corner <strong>of</strong> Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero and Del Monte Avenue, now Tr<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
Christian High School and a McDonald’s restaurant, was home to the oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Tynan Lumber<br />
Company. The beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> a residential neighborhood below Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street and between Figueroa<br />
Street and Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero, with most build<strong>in</strong>gs between Figueroa and Cortes Streets, first appear on<br />
the 1926 Sanborn Map. Residential development was concentr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the three blocks bordered by<br />
Anthony and Webster Streets between Figueroa and Cortes Streets.<br />
By the 1962 Sanborn Map, the area between Figueroa Street and Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero, from Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street<br />
south to Webster Street, had been almost completely developed with s<strong>in</strong>gle family homes, with the<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> the block bound by Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero and Cortes, Anthony, and Frankl<strong>in</strong> Streets, which was<br />
home to the Union Ice Company.<br />
117 Lydon (1997), 71.<br />
118 Lydon (1985), 388‐390.<br />
119 Brown, 2; Howard (<strong>200</strong>2), 53.<br />
120 Brown, 8.<br />
68
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 9‐10. 1926 Sanborn Map <strong>of</strong> Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision, with the baseball field to the east, and the facilities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Coast Valleys Gas and Electric Company and Tynan Lumber Company to the north.<br />
69
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 9‐11. Portion <strong>of</strong> 1927 panorama show<strong>in</strong>g rail area and Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own, look<strong>in</strong>g east. The <strong>in</strong>tersection <strong>at</strong> bottom<br />
center is Del Monte Avenue and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Street (A.C. Heidrick, photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library,<br />
California History Room).<br />
Figure 9‐12. Zoom from 1933 aerial show<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dustrial works east <strong>of</strong> downtown, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the prom<strong>in</strong>ent gas<br />
hold<strong>in</strong>g tanks <strong>of</strong> the Coast Valleys Gas and Electric Company (courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History<br />
Room).<br />
70
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 9‐13. Portion <strong>of</strong> 1956 aerial view <strong>of</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong>, look<strong>in</strong>g south, show<strong>in</strong>g Coast Valleys Gas and<br />
Electric Company, Jacks Park and the Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision. The Royal Presidio Chapel is visible <strong>at</strong> the top right (Lee<br />
Blaisdell, photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
The parcel now known as Jacks Park has been home to a series <strong>of</strong> baseball fields s<strong>in</strong>ce 1892. Th<strong>at</strong> year,<br />
F<strong>at</strong>her Ramon Mestres <strong>of</strong> the Royal Presidio Chapel rented the land from the Jacks family for use as a<br />
youth baseball field. Mrs. Mary Jacks Thomas gave the parcel to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1928, with the stipul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
th<strong>at</strong> it only be used for recre<strong>at</strong>ional use. The 1926 Sanborn Map shows one range <strong>of</strong> bleachers and a<br />
small grandstand <strong>in</strong> the northwest corner <strong>of</strong> the parcel. For decades, the field hosted the San Francisco<br />
Seals <strong>of</strong> the Pacific Coast League, who held their spr<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. In 1956, follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> a new field <strong>in</strong> El Estero Park, the old ballpark was converted to a s<strong>of</strong>tball field and play<br />
area and the fences and bleaches were replaced. The 1962 Sanborn Map shows a canted bleacher<br />
structure along the north edge <strong>of</strong> the parcel. These bleachers are no longer extant and the orient<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />
the field has been switched, with home pl<strong>at</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the parcel’s southwest corner. 121<br />
121 “New Ball Park Plans Approved by Council” (December 7, 1956); “<strong>City</strong> Manager Answers Questions on Future <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Baseball Park” (April 6, 1954); “No Action On Destruction <strong>of</strong> Old Ball Park <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>” (March 31, 1954); O’Donnell.<br />
71
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
9.2 Summary <strong>of</strong> Significant Themes<br />
Development <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>in</strong> the early twentieth century is important because it was a period <strong>of</strong><br />
unprecedented growth for the city. The enormous success <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry, along with a renewed<br />
military presence <strong>in</strong> the area, fueled extensive commercial and residential development <strong>in</strong> downtown<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong>. Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, Alvarado Street, long the town’s commercial center, became a much<br />
denser commercial corridor, while the neighborhoods adjacent to downtown were built out to<br />
accommod<strong>at</strong>e a rapidly grow<strong>in</strong>g popul<strong>at</strong>ion. As the city grew, the bus<strong>in</strong>esses and neighborhoods <strong>of</strong><br />
downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued to c<strong>at</strong>er to an ethnically diverse popul<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded persons <strong>of</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, Japanese, Italian and Portuguese descent, among others.<br />
9.3 Associ<strong>at</strong>ed Property Types<br />
Commercial and Institutional Properties<br />
The city’s flourish<strong>in</strong>g economy spurred a significant commercial build<strong>in</strong>g boom <strong>in</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> the first years <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. Much <strong>of</strong> this development was concentr<strong>at</strong>ed along Alvarado<br />
Street. In addition, several important public build<strong>in</strong>gs were constructed dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
city’s rapidly grow<strong>in</strong>g popul<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
Extant Examples<br />
Commercial build<strong>in</strong>gs built along or near Alvarado Street between 1900 and 1939 <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
Ordway Block Build<strong>in</strong>g, 398 Alvarado Street (1905)<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> County Bank (Wells Fargo Bank), 399 Alvarado Street (1931)<br />
Goldst<strong>in</strong>e Block Build<strong>in</strong>g, 400 Alvarado Street (1906)<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Hotel , 408 Alvarado Street (1904)<br />
M. Ort<strong>in</strong>’s Block, 409 Alvarado Street (1910)<br />
A.R. Underwood Build<strong>in</strong>g, 416 Alvarado Street (1912)<br />
Golden St<strong>at</strong>e The<strong>at</strong>er , 417 Alvarado Street (1926)<br />
Regency The<strong>at</strong>er/BPOE Build<strong>in</strong>g, 426 Alvarado Street (1917)<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Investment Company, 435 Alvarado Street (1910)<br />
First N<strong>at</strong>ional Bank <strong>Monterey</strong> , 447 Alvarado Street (1904)<br />
426 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal (1929)<br />
Marsh Build<strong>in</strong>g, 650 Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero (1928)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Build<strong>in</strong>g, 201 Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street (1928)<br />
266 Pearl Street (1926)<br />
Herald Build<strong>in</strong>g, 486 Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Street (1926)<br />
Public build<strong>in</strong>gs from the period th<strong>at</strong> are associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>Monterey</strong>’s popul<strong>at</strong>ion growth from 1900 to<br />
1939 <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
Japanese American Citizens League Hall, 424 Adams Street (1926)<br />
Redmen Hall, 475 Alvarado Street (1926)<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Firehouse, 414 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal (1910)<br />
First Presbyterian Church, 398 Pacific Street (1910)<br />
Masonic Lodge, 535 Pacific Street (1915)<br />
Few Memorial Hall, 570 Pacific Street (1935)<br />
YMCA, 627 Pearl Street (1905)<br />
72
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Old <strong>Monterey</strong> Library, 425 Van Buren (1910)<br />
El Estero Presbyterian Church, 490 Cam<strong>in</strong>o El Estero (1905)<br />
Properties with<strong>in</strong> the survey area th<strong>at</strong> are directly associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the <strong>Monterey</strong> sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
Wharf #2, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g warehouse and wharf structure (1927)<br />
Architectural Description<br />
Commercial properties <strong>in</strong> the survey area from this period tend to be one <strong>of</strong> three dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
architectural styles: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mission Revival, or Renaissance Revival.<br />
Spanish Colonial Revival<br />
Based on the Baroque architecture <strong>of</strong> Mexico, the Spanish Colonial Revival style was especially popular<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the early part <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century <strong>in</strong> California, portions <strong>of</strong> the Southwest and Florida.<br />
Generally characterized by red tile ro<strong>of</strong>s and white stucco‐covered wall surfaces, the style was used for<br />
schools, churches, residences, apartment build<strong>in</strong>gs, commercial build<strong>in</strong>gs and government build<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> the survey area, the build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> J.C. Anthony (266 Pearl Street and 486 Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Street) are<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>ctive for Anthony’s cladd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Spanish Colonial Revival forms with coursed ashlar chalk rock.<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> County Bank (1931)<br />
399 Alvarado Street<br />
Goldst<strong>in</strong>e Block Build<strong>in</strong>g (1906)<br />
400 Alvarado Street<br />
423 Alvarado Street (1926)<br />
266 Pearl Street (1926) Herald Build<strong>in</strong>g (1926)<br />
486 Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Street<br />
73
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the Spanish Colonial Revival‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey<br />
area <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• Arched or rectangular w<strong>in</strong>dow open<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
• Stucco cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Stepped or sloped parapets<br />
• Fl<strong>at</strong> or low‐pitched gabled ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />
• Clay tile ro<strong>of</strong> cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Clay tile decor<strong>at</strong>ive elements, such as vents and entrance hoods<br />
• Bas‐relief ornament<br />
• Asymmetrical façade<br />
Mission Revival<br />
The Mission Revival style preceded the large array <strong>of</strong> Hispanic styles th<strong>at</strong> would become markedly<br />
popular <strong>in</strong> California <strong>in</strong> the 1920s and 1930s. Characterized by curvil<strong>in</strong>ear parapets, stucco cladd<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
arched door and w<strong>in</strong>dow open<strong>in</strong>gs, the Mission Revival style drew from the romanticism <strong>of</strong> California’s<br />
colonial past and manifested itself <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs large and small, residential, commercial and <strong>in</strong>stitutional.<br />
Only commercial and <strong>in</strong>stitutional examples <strong>of</strong> the style are extant <strong>in</strong> the survey area. Some <strong>of</strong> these<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong>e stylistic <strong>in</strong>fluences from other comp<strong>at</strong>ible styles, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Spanish Colonial Revival<br />
(<strong>Monterey</strong> Investment Company Build<strong>in</strong>g, 435 Alvarado Street) and Churrigueresque (Golden St<strong>at</strong>e<br />
The<strong>at</strong>er, 417 Alvarado Street).<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Hotel (1904)<br />
408 Alvarado Street<br />
Golden St<strong>at</strong>e The<strong>at</strong>er (1926)<br />
417 Alvarado Street<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Investment Co. Bldg. (1910)<br />
435 Alvarado Street<br />
First N<strong>at</strong>ional Bank <strong>Monterey</strong> (1904)<br />
447 Alvarado Street<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Firehouse (1910)<br />
414 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />
Old <strong>Monterey</strong> Library (1910)<br />
425 Van Buren Street<br />
74
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the Mission Revival‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• W<strong>in</strong>dows with arched open<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
• Islamic‐style ornament<br />
• Recessed, arcaded entries<br />
• Curvil<strong>in</strong>ear ro<strong>of</strong> parapet<br />
• Fl<strong>at</strong> ro<strong>of</strong><br />
• Stucco cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Clay tile ro<strong>of</strong> cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Renaissance Revival<br />
The Renaissance Revival style, which <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong>es elements drawn from the architecture <strong>of</strong> the Italian<br />
Renaissance, was a popular style for commercial architecture <strong>in</strong> America <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>at</strong>e n<strong>in</strong>eteenth and early<br />
twentieth centuries. The examples with<strong>in</strong> the survey area tend to be r<strong>at</strong>her restra<strong>in</strong>ed renditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
style.<br />
A.R. Underwood Build<strong>in</strong>g (1912)<br />
416 Alvarado Street<br />
Regency The<strong>at</strong>er/BPOE Build<strong>in</strong>g (1917)<br />
426 Alvarado Street<br />
First Presbyterian Church (1910)<br />
398 Pacific Street<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the Renaissance Revival‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• Symmetrical façade<br />
• W<strong>in</strong>dows arranged <strong>in</strong> bands<br />
• Rectangular and arched w<strong>in</strong>dows<br />
• Masonry construction<br />
• Accentu<strong>at</strong>ed belt courses<br />
• Wide, overhang<strong>in</strong>g cornices<br />
• Modillions <strong>at</strong> cornice<br />
Residential Properties<br />
The dwell<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>Monterey</strong>’s residential expansion from 1900 to<br />
1939 are typically modest and represent vernacular <strong>in</strong>stances r<strong>at</strong>her than high‐style examples <strong>of</strong> earlytwentieth‐century<br />
forms and styles. Exceptions <strong>in</strong>clude the Victorian residence <strong>at</strong> 498 Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street<br />
(1905), the Queen Anne cottage <strong>at</strong> 462 Webster Street (1905) and the residence <strong>at</strong> 556 Abrego Street,<br />
which Mary Corn<strong>in</strong>g W<strong>in</strong>slow Black designed and built <strong>in</strong> the Spanish Colonial Revival style <strong>in</strong> 1930.<br />
75
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Victorian: 498 Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street (1905)<br />
Queen Anne Cottage: 462 Webster<br />
Street (1905)<br />
Spanish Colonial Revival: Mary C.W.<br />
Black Studio (1930), 556 Abrego Street<br />
Architectural Description<br />
Residential properties <strong>in</strong> the survey area from this period tend to be one <strong>of</strong> three styles: Vernacular<br />
Cottage, Craftsman, or Spanish Colonial Revival. They are generally loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the eastern portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
survey area, <strong>in</strong> the area orig<strong>in</strong>ally pl<strong>at</strong>ted as the Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision.<br />
Vernacular Cottage<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the early‐twentieth‐century residences with<strong>in</strong> the survey area are modestly‐sized, vernacular<br />
style worker’s cottages. Such houses were typically based on standard vernacular models and many<br />
were constructed with little or no decor<strong>at</strong>ion. A few blocks with<strong>in</strong> the Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision fe<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
small collections (two to four) <strong>of</strong> adjacent cottages th<strong>at</strong> appear to have been built <strong>at</strong> the same time.<br />
557 & 559 Rob<strong>in</strong>son Street (1926) 522 Cortes Street (1932) 638 Anthony Street (1915)<br />
563 Figueroa Street (1926) 511 Cortes Street (1926) 435 Alma Street (1920)<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the Vernacular Cottage‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
One story (or one story with raised basement)<br />
Wood‐frame construction<br />
Gable or hip ro<strong>of</strong><br />
76
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Wood cladd<strong>in</strong>g (sh<strong>in</strong>gles or horizontal sid<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
Simple wood ornament<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Wood‐sash w<strong>in</strong>dows (typically double‐hung)<br />
Partial‐width porch, <strong>of</strong>ten recessed<br />
Craftsman Bungalow<br />
The Craftsman style is most closely associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the Arts and Crafts movement, and although<br />
primarily thought <strong>of</strong> as a residential style it can be found <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> property types, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>glefamily<br />
residences, multi‐family residences, commercial and <strong>in</strong>stitutional build<strong>in</strong>gs. Craftsman Bungalows<br />
represent the most modest rendition <strong>of</strong> the style and are generally one to one‐and‐a‐half stories <strong>in</strong><br />
height. The Craftsman Bungalows <strong>in</strong> the survey area generally d<strong>at</strong>e from the 1930s.<br />
519 Pearl Street (1935) 499 Cortes Street (1930) 415 Figueroa Street (1930)<br />
545 Pearl Street (1930) 445 Cortes Street (1930) 571‐575 Polk Street (1905)<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the Craftsman‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• One to one‐and‐a‐half stories <strong>in</strong> height<br />
• Wood sash w<strong>in</strong>dows<br />
• Leaded glass<br />
• W<strong>in</strong>dows arranged <strong>in</strong> bands<br />
• Partial‐ or full‐width porch<br />
• Square or b<strong>at</strong>tered porch supports<br />
• S<strong>in</strong>gle door entrances, <strong>of</strong>ten with glaz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Hipped or gabled low‐pitched ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />
• Wide, overhang<strong>in</strong>g eaves with exposed rafters and purl<strong>in</strong>s<br />
• Wood clapboard and/or wood sh<strong>in</strong>gle sid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Use <strong>of</strong> rubble stone <strong>at</strong> found<strong>at</strong>ion and porch rail/supports<br />
77
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Spanish Colonial Revival<br />
The survey area <strong>in</strong>cludes several residences designed <strong>in</strong> the Spanish Colonial Revival style. This style,<br />
which elabor<strong>at</strong>ed on the Hispanicism <strong>of</strong> the Mission Revival style, became pr<strong>of</strong>oundly popular after its<br />
appearance <strong>at</strong> the Panama‐California Exposition held <strong>in</strong> San Diego <strong>in</strong> 1915, and is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
prevalent residential styles <strong>of</strong> twentieth century California. The residences are modest and represent<br />
vernacular forms r<strong>at</strong>her than high‐style examples <strong>of</strong> the Spanish Colonial Revival style.<br />
573 Anthony Street (1930) 491 Webster Street (1939) 446 Anthony (1930)<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the Spanish Colonial Revival‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey<br />
area <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• Arched or rectangular w<strong>in</strong>dow open<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
• Partial‐width porches, <strong>of</strong>ten recessed with arched entries<br />
• Stepped or sloped parapets<br />
• Fl<strong>at</strong> or low‐pitched gabled ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />
• Stucco cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Clay tile ro<strong>of</strong> cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Clay tile decor<strong>at</strong>ive elements, such as vents and entrance hoods<br />
• Asymmetrical façade<br />
Significance and Integrity<br />
In order to be eligible for list<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the local, st<strong>at</strong>e, or n<strong>at</strong>ional historic register, early‐twentieth‐century<br />
properties <strong>in</strong> the Downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> survey area must be significant under <strong>at</strong> least one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria.<br />
NRHP Criterion A/CRHR Criterion 1 (Events, P<strong>at</strong>terns and Trends)<br />
A property <strong>in</strong> the Downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> survey area may be significant under Criterion A/1 for its<br />
associ<strong>at</strong>ion with the phenomenal growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>in</strong> the first decades <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century.<br />
Specifically, a property may be significant for its associ<strong>at</strong>ion with either <strong>of</strong> the two primary drivers <strong>of</strong> this<br />
growth: the rise <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry and the renewed presence <strong>of</strong> the military <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>.<br />
Properties may also be significant for their associ<strong>at</strong>ion with particular ethnic groups th<strong>at</strong> played an<br />
important role <strong>in</strong> the city’s growth dur<strong>in</strong>g this period. The Japanese American Citizens League Hall <strong>at</strong> 424<br />
Adams Street, for example, is significant as the sole surviv<strong>in</strong>g structure from the Japantown/Ch<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>own,<br />
which was loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton and Frankl<strong>in</strong> Streets for decades.<br />
NRHP Criterion B/CRHR Criterion 2 (Person)<br />
A property may be significant under Criterion B/2 if it is found to be associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the life <strong>of</strong> a<br />
significant member <strong>of</strong> early‐twentieth‐century <strong>Monterey</strong>, such as a prom<strong>in</strong>ent merchant or pr<strong>of</strong>essional,<br />
78
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
or an <strong>in</strong>fluential civic or community leader. Note, however, th<strong>at</strong> a residence eligible under Criterion B/2<br />
should be the best or only rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g represent<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the person’s <strong>in</strong>fluence or achievements and not<br />
simply their place <strong>of</strong> residence.<br />
NRHP Criterion C/CRHR Criterion 3 (Design/Construction)<br />
A commercial property may be significant under Criterion C/3 as an example <strong>of</strong> an architectural style<br />
popular <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>in</strong> the first decades <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Spanish Colonial Revival,<br />
Mission Revival, Renaissance Revival. Properties associ<strong>at</strong>ed with prolific Bay Area architect William H.<br />
Weeks may also be significant under this criterion as the work <strong>of</strong> a master. The residences <strong>in</strong> the survey<br />
area from this period are typically modest and represent vernacular <strong>in</strong>stances r<strong>at</strong>her than examples <strong>of</strong><br />
high‐style architecture; as such, these residences are unlikely to qualify <strong>in</strong>dividually under this criterion,<br />
but may be potential contributors to a district. Residences <strong>in</strong> the survey area are not likely to be<br />
significant under this criterion as the work <strong>of</strong> a master, as most were not architect‐designed.<br />
Integrity Consider<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
In order to be eligible for list<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the local, st<strong>at</strong>e, or n<strong>at</strong>ional historic register, a property must reta<strong>in</strong><br />
sufficient <strong>in</strong>tegrity to convey its significance as part <strong>of</strong> the early‐twentieth‐century theme. A property<br />
th<strong>at</strong> has sufficient <strong>in</strong>tegrity will reta<strong>in</strong> a majority <strong>of</strong> the character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures listed above. A<br />
property significant under Criterion A/1 should have <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ion, design, sett<strong>in</strong>g, and feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong><br />
the m<strong>in</strong>imum. A residence significant under Criterion B/2 should reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> associ<strong>at</strong>ion, design,<br />
and feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum because retention <strong>of</strong> the physical fe<strong>at</strong>ures th<strong>at</strong> convey the property’s<br />
connection to a significant person is critical. L<strong>at</strong>er alter<strong>at</strong>ions may not affect the <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> properties<br />
significant under this criterion if the significant person was still connected to the property when the<br />
alter<strong>at</strong>ions were completed. Integrity <strong>of</strong> design, m<strong>at</strong>erials, workmanship, and feel<strong>in</strong>g are the key aspects<br />
for a property to convey its significance under Criterion C/3. If the property is significant under this<br />
criterion as an example <strong>of</strong> an early American‐era architectural style, it is possible for some m<strong>at</strong>erials to<br />
be replaced without drastically dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g the property’s overall <strong>in</strong>tegrity, as long as these alter<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
are subord<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>e to the overall character <strong>of</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g. For example, a residence may reta<strong>in</strong> sufficient<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrity if it has undergone m<strong>in</strong>or alter<strong>at</strong>ions (i.e. w<strong>in</strong>dow replacement or alter<strong>at</strong>ions to the stairs),<br />
while a similar property which had been substantially changed (i.e. stripped <strong>of</strong> its wood ornament, reclad<br />
<strong>in</strong> stucco, or given a second story addition) may not qualify.<br />
79
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
10. Context: Context: World War II and Postwar Eras (1940‐1978)<br />
10.1 Historical Background<br />
Ongo<strong>in</strong>g Role <strong>of</strong> Military <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the Depression, the Presidio hosted an outpost <strong>of</strong> the Civilian Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Corps (CCC), who<br />
completed several improvements on‐site, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the bleachers <strong>at</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> parade ground. In October<br />
1938, nearly $900,<strong>000</strong> was approved for a Works Progress Adm<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ion (WPA) project to construct<br />
the East Garrison facility <strong>of</strong> Camp Ord <strong>at</strong> the Gigl<strong>in</strong>g Military Reserv<strong>at</strong>ion. This area was design<strong>at</strong>ed as<br />
Fort Ord <strong>in</strong> 1940, <strong>in</strong> honor <strong>of</strong> General E.O.C. Ord, who as a young lieutenant had helped build the<br />
structures on the site <strong>of</strong> the Presidio <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1847 dur<strong>in</strong>g the Mexican‐American War. Before its<br />
design<strong>at</strong>ion as Fort Ord, Gigl<strong>in</strong>g Reserv<strong>at</strong>ion had been used only by troops st<strong>at</strong>ioned <strong>at</strong> the Presidio. 122<br />
World War II brought significant expansion the military facilities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. In August 1940, Fort Ord<br />
became the home and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g post <strong>of</strong> the 7th Infantry Division, under the command <strong>of</strong> General Joe<br />
Stilwell. By 1942, the Fort had almost doubled <strong>in</strong> size, <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g 29,<strong>000</strong> acres, and hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> least<br />
$12 million <strong>in</strong> improvements under contract. Dur<strong>in</strong>g World War II, as many as 50,<strong>000</strong> troops were<br />
st<strong>at</strong>ioned <strong>at</strong> the post. At the same time, the U.S. Navy had leased the Hotel Del Monte for use as a flight<br />
school. By the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 1944, more than 5,<strong>000</strong> avi<strong>at</strong>ion cadets had <strong>at</strong>tended the school. The Presidio<br />
served dur<strong>in</strong>g World War II as an <strong>in</strong>duction center and process<strong>in</strong>g facility for thousands <strong>of</strong> young men.<br />
Temporary barracks covered the parade ground. 123<br />
Decisions made by the federal government immedi<strong>at</strong>ely follow<strong>in</strong>g World War II have had a long‐last<strong>in</strong>g<br />
impact on the role <strong>of</strong> the military <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. In June <strong>of</strong> 1946, the Presidio was selected as the home <strong>of</strong><br />
the Military Intelligence Service Language School. Japanese, Russian and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese were the first<br />
languages taught. In 1947, the school was named the Army Language School, and on July 1, 1963 was<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficially renamed the Defense Language Institute, West Coast Branch. In 1947, the Defense Department<br />
purchased the Del Monte Hotel for use as the Naval Postgradu<strong>at</strong>e School, which it rema<strong>in</strong>s today. After<br />
World War II ended, activity <strong>at</strong> Fort Ord slowed, but <strong>in</strong> 1946 the post <strong>of</strong>ficially became one <strong>of</strong> ten<br />
military establishments where basic and advance <strong>in</strong>fantry tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was conducted, a function it would<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to serve for the next 30 years. The Fort became the home <strong>of</strong> the 4th Replacement Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Center, cre<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g a serious hous<strong>in</strong>g shortage th<strong>at</strong> resulted <strong>in</strong> high rents and slum conditions for the east<br />
section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. In 1951, $26 million was appropri<strong>at</strong>ed for the construction <strong>of</strong><br />
permanent build<strong>in</strong>gs to house the military personnel. In 1950 American forces began deployment to the<br />
Korean Pen<strong>in</strong>sula, and Fort Ord served as the center for basic and advanced tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soldiers bound for the Korean conflict. 124<br />
In the 1960s the U.S. <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> Vietnam <strong>in</strong>creased, and Fort Ord became a stag<strong>in</strong>g area for units<br />
depart<strong>in</strong>g to Asia. Fort Ord cont<strong>in</strong>ued to function as a center for basic and advanced tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g until 1974<br />
when the center was deactiv<strong>at</strong>ed and made the home <strong>of</strong> the 7th Light Infantry Division. The impact <strong>of</strong><br />
this change was felt throughout all <strong>of</strong> northern <strong>Monterey</strong> County by the subsequent demand for hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong> military personnel. 125<br />
122 Conway, 120‐122; Nomell<strong>in</strong>i, II‐30.<br />
123 Conway, 127‐128; Nomell<strong>in</strong>i, II‐29.<br />
124 Architectural Resources Group (<strong>200</strong>3); Conway, 127‐129; Nomell<strong>in</strong>i, II‐29‐30.<br />
125 Architectural Resources Group (<strong>200</strong>3); Nomell<strong>in</strong>i, II‐31.<br />
80
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
In the 1980s and 1990s Fort Ord was one <strong>of</strong> four loc<strong>at</strong>ions where light <strong>in</strong>fantry divisions were st<strong>at</strong>ioned.<br />
In 1991 the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRAC) recommended th<strong>at</strong> Fort Ord be<br />
closed, and the troops <strong>of</strong> the 7th Infantry Division (Light) be reloc<strong>at</strong>ed to Fort Lewis, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton. Fort<br />
Ord was formally deactiv<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> September 1994. The Army reta<strong>in</strong>s approxim<strong>at</strong>ely five percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property for a Presidio <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> (POM) annex and reserve center. Portions <strong>of</strong> the former Fort were<br />
turned over to the California St<strong>at</strong>e University system, the University <strong>of</strong> California, the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land<br />
Management, the Cities <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>a, Seaside, <strong>Monterey</strong>, and Del Rey Oaks, and <strong>Monterey</strong> County. 126<br />
The Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> Downtown <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
The advent <strong>of</strong> World War II brought significant changes to the Lower Alvarado section <strong>of</strong> downtown<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong>. Several bars, nightclubs and pawnshops pushed out “family‐oriented” establishments, as<br />
Lower Alvarado became the enterta<strong>in</strong>ment district for the thousands <strong>of</strong> servicemen tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> Fort Ord.<br />
The crash <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e popul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>at</strong>e 1940s spurred further changes, as the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g shops <strong>in</strong><br />
the area th<strong>at</strong> had c<strong>at</strong>ered to fishermen and their families closed. 127<br />
In 1949, Alvarado Street was pa<strong>in</strong>ted gold for the centennial celebr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> California’ Constitutional<br />
Convention. The festival <strong>in</strong>cluded a carnival and a three‐hour‐long parade with a dozen divisions <strong>of</strong><br />
servicemen, along with performances by drill teams and historical characters. Extensive beautific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
efforts were undertaken along Alvarado Street <strong>in</strong> prepar<strong>at</strong>ion for 1949 celebr<strong>at</strong>ion. Alvarado Street was<br />
converted to a one‐way street <strong>in</strong> 1950. 128<br />
Figure 10‐1. 1945 photo <strong>of</strong> Lower Alvarado (courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
126 Architectural Resources Group (<strong>200</strong>3).<br />
127 Howard (<strong>200</strong>7), A; Howard (1996), 18; Karas, 13. Pacific Grove rema<strong>in</strong>ed a dry town until the l<strong>at</strong>e 1960s, re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g Lower<br />
Alvarado’s role as the center <strong>of</strong> nightlife for the region.<br />
128 Karas, 16.<br />
81
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 10‐2. Aerial view <strong>of</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong>, June 6, 1946 (William L. Morgan, photographer, courtesy<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
82
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 10‐3. Alvarado Street, July 3, 1946 (William L. Morgan, photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library,<br />
California History Room).<br />
Figure 10‐4. Centennial Celebr<strong>at</strong>ion parade along Alvarado Street, September 3, 1949 (William L. Morgan,<br />
photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
83
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 10‐5. View north along Alvarado Street, from Pearl Street to Custom House, August 19, 1955 (William L.<br />
Morgan, photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
By the mid‐1950s, the idea <strong>of</strong> undertak<strong>in</strong>g an urban renewal program <strong>in</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> was<br />
supported by a wide variety <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials and citizens’ groups, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Department,<br />
the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, the St<strong>at</strong>e Parks and Recre<strong>at</strong>ion Department, the Citizens Advisory Committee<br />
on the <strong>Monterey</strong> Plan, and the <strong>Monterey</strong> County Citizens Plann<strong>in</strong>g Associ<strong>at</strong>ion. 129 The city was reel<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from the unexpected collapse <strong>of</strong> the sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>at</strong>e 1940s. By launch<strong>in</strong>g an urban renewal<br />
program, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> could garner millions <strong>of</strong> dollars <strong>in</strong> federal <strong>in</strong>vestment, which <strong>in</strong> turn, so<br />
the th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g went, would <strong>at</strong>tract millions <strong>of</strong> dollars <strong>in</strong> priv<strong>at</strong>e <strong>in</strong>vestment. Redevelopment efforts<br />
focused on the Lower Alvarado area, which many saw as a blighted, seedy area filled with pool halls,<br />
bars, cigar stores, pawnshops and other undesirable uses.<br />
In order to garner Federal fund<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Monterey</strong>’s <strong>City</strong> Council voted to cre<strong>at</strong>e an urban renewal agency <strong>in</strong><br />
October 1957 and the Agency was formally established <strong>in</strong> January 1959. 130 The redevelopment area<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded most <strong>of</strong> the northern half <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>’s downtown, roughly extend<strong>in</strong>g northward from<br />
Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street to the bay, between Pacific and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Streets. The agency’s directive was to<br />
“elim<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>e and prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> blight” by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g safety, employment and land utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
129 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 1, 3.<br />
130 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 1, 3.<br />
84
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
with<strong>in</strong> this boundary, while protect<strong>in</strong>g and, <strong>in</strong> some cases, rehabilit<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g the area’s historically significant<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs. 131 In essence, much <strong>of</strong> the area was to be transformed “from a high density, substandard<br />
residential region to one dom<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ed by the retail trade and resort <strong>in</strong>dustries.” 132 Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, key<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> the Urban Renewal Agency’s first redevelopment plan, released <strong>in</strong> 1960, <strong>in</strong>cluded an 800‐<br />
car garage, a pedestrian mall, and a major department store. Despite considerable community<br />
opposition, most notably from those lower downtown residents and proprietors who were to be<br />
displaced, the city council approved the Custom House Redevelopment Plan by a 3‐2 marg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> July<br />
19<strong>61</strong>. 133<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 19<strong>61</strong> plan, the Custom House Redevelopment Area was “characterized by a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
circumstances th<strong>at</strong> adversely affect the stability and well‐be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the area and the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>.” 134<br />
These circumstances were broken <strong>in</strong>to four c<strong>at</strong>egories: improperly pl<strong>at</strong>ted lots; defective design and<br />
deterior<strong>at</strong>ion; overcrowd<strong>in</strong>g and faulty exterior spac<strong>in</strong>g; and age, obsolescence, deterior<strong>at</strong>ion or<br />
dilapid<strong>at</strong>ion. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the report, 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the structures <strong>in</strong> the redevelopment area were<br />
substandard and beyond rehabilit<strong>at</strong>ion, and nearly one third <strong>of</strong> the total floor space consisted <strong>of</strong><br />
dwell<strong>in</strong>gs th<strong>at</strong> were “blighted, deterior<strong>at</strong>ed or deterior<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g.” 135<br />
In l<strong>at</strong>e 19<strong>61</strong>, the <strong>City</strong> hired a three‐person team <strong>of</strong> architects and planners consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> architect John C.<br />
Warnecke, planner Lawrence Liv<strong>in</strong>gston, and landscape architect Lawrence Halpr<strong>in</strong> to conduct a “total<br />
design concept study” for the redevelopment area. As a result <strong>of</strong> this study, several <strong>of</strong> the<br />
redevelopment plan’s most contentious aspects were modified. Both the proposed pedestrian mall and<br />
park<strong>in</strong>g garage were significantly reduced <strong>in</strong> size. In addition, <strong>in</strong> response to concerns about traffic<br />
congestion, the study suggested the redevelopment plan <strong>in</strong>clude an underground tunnel to foster better<br />
traffic flow through the area. 136<br />
With the advent <strong>of</strong> redevelopment‐rel<strong>at</strong>ed condemn<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>in</strong> the early 1960s, more pool halls, bars and<br />
other “fly‐by‐night” ventures occupied the Lower Alvarado area. Demolition began with the removal <strong>of</strong><br />
several structures <strong>in</strong> l<strong>at</strong>e 1962. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the redevelopment area were torn<br />
down. Important exceptions <strong>in</strong>cluded the Custom House, the Pacific House, the Old Whal<strong>in</strong>g St<strong>at</strong>ion, the<br />
First Brick House, Casa del Oro, California’s First The<strong>at</strong>er, the San Carlos Hotel, and the Wells Fargo<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> 399 Alvarado Street. 137 Some historic build<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Capitular Hall, the Perry‐Downer<br />
House, the Doud House, the Ordway Build<strong>in</strong>g, and the Osio‐Rodriguez Adobe, were rehabilit<strong>at</strong>ed as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the redevelopment effort. Most build<strong>in</strong>g demolition occurred <strong>in</strong> the mid‐1960s, though the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs along Alvarado Street was not removed until November 1974. 138<br />
131 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 2.<br />
132 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 2‐3.<br />
133 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 4, 7. Walton, 242‐243. Despite the name, the redevelopment area did not<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude the Custom House.<br />
134 Urban Renewal Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, Article V, Section 301.<br />
135 Urban Renewal Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, Article V, Section 301.<br />
136 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 9; Walton, 243‐244.<br />
137 The San Carlos Hotel was demolished <strong>in</strong> 1983.<br />
138 Howard (<strong>200</strong>7), A.; Karas, 16; “Renewal Demolition: Build<strong>in</strong>gs Fall<strong>in</strong>g on Lower Alvarado.”<br />
85
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 10‐6. Map <strong>of</strong> Custom House Redevelopment Area (source: “Urban Renewal New Look for <strong>Monterey</strong>,”<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Herald, July 14, 1960).<br />
86
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 10‐7. East side <strong>of</strong> Alvarado Street, May 29, 1967 (William L. Morgan, photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Public Library, California History Room).<br />
Figure 10‐8. Demolition <strong>of</strong> same section, June 28, 1967 (William L. Morgan, photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Public Library, California History Room).<br />
87
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Figure 10‐9. Demolition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> The<strong>at</strong>re and Kimball shops, February 1, 1967 (William L. Morgan,<br />
photographer, courtesy <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library, California History Room).<br />
A wide variety <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g types, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fice build<strong>in</strong>gs, commercial establishments, apartment<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs and s<strong>in</strong>gle family homes, were demolished. Though def<strong>in</strong>itive numbers are hard to come by,<br />
contemporary accounts provide some <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the scale <strong>of</strong> the residential and commercial<br />
displacement engendered by the redevelopment project. In all, approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 100 bus<strong>in</strong>esses were<br />
displaced, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cafés, bars, card rooms, barbershops, cloth<strong>in</strong>g stores, upholstery shops and many<br />
others. In addition, approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 600 residents, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g over 100 families, were displaced, as the<br />
“wood‐frame houses <strong>of</strong> Italian and Portuguese fish<strong>in</strong>g families, Spanish cannery workers, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cooks,<br />
Anglo mechanics, former soldiers, and a host <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance workers who kept the town and wharf<br />
runn<strong>in</strong>g” were cleared. 139<br />
In June 1964, the <strong>City</strong> selected local development Custom House Associ<strong>at</strong>es, l<strong>at</strong>er <strong>in</strong> partnership with<br />
the N<strong>at</strong>ional Land and Investment Company <strong>of</strong> Philadelphia, to implement the redevelopment plan <strong>in</strong><br />
keep<strong>in</strong>g with the guidel<strong>in</strong>es laid out <strong>in</strong> the Warnecke/Liv<strong>in</strong>gston/Halpr<strong>in</strong> study. 140 Work began l<strong>at</strong>er th<strong>at</strong><br />
year, with the St<strong>at</strong>e Division <strong>of</strong> Beaches and Parks’ temporary landscap<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Custom House Plaza. 141 In<br />
1965, the <strong>City</strong> completed an Urban Renewal Traffic Plan th<strong>at</strong> significantly transformed transport<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
routes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>’s central bus<strong>in</strong>ess district by convert<strong>in</strong>g several streets to one‐way thoroughfares<br />
and extend<strong>in</strong>g and widen<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> streets. In the wake <strong>of</strong> this study, the $3 million underground traffic<br />
139 Walton, 242.<br />
140 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 13,‐14.<br />
141 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 15. Custom House Plaza was completed <strong>in</strong> 1969.<br />
88
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
tunnel was made an <strong>of</strong>ficial part <strong>of</strong> the redevelopment plan. Construction <strong>of</strong> the tunnel was begun <strong>in</strong><br />
January 1967, and the tunnel opened <strong>in</strong> April 1968. 142 The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess activity along Alvarado<br />
Street began dropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>f badly when work began on the underground tunnel. 143<br />
Progress on other aspects <strong>of</strong> the redevelopment plan was slow <strong>in</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g. At the end <strong>of</strong> 1966, the <strong>City</strong><br />
still had not negoti<strong>at</strong>ed a contract with Custom House Associ<strong>at</strong>es. The developers were unwill<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
complete negoti<strong>at</strong>ions until they were certa<strong>in</strong> th<strong>at</strong> J.C. Penney, the project’s prospective major tenant,<br />
would sign on to the project. Follow<strong>in</strong>g several rounds <strong>of</strong> discussion with <strong>City</strong> employees, J.C. Penney<br />
signed a letter <strong>of</strong> agreement with the <strong>City</strong> <strong>in</strong> January 1968. Many community members, though,<br />
opposed the size (three stories) and loc<strong>at</strong>ion (between Pacific Street and Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal) <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />
store. 144<br />
Opposition to the project became moot, however, when, <strong>in</strong> March 1971, both J.C. Penney and W<strong>in</strong>mar<br />
Incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed (which had replaced Customs House Associ<strong>at</strong>es as project developer <strong>in</strong> 1969),<br />
unexpectedly announced their withdrawal from the project. W<strong>in</strong>mar had been unable to <strong>at</strong>tract<br />
secondary tenants, which <strong>in</strong> turn had nullified J.C. Penney’s <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the project area. After more than<br />
a decade <strong>of</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> had little to show for its redevelopment efforts beyond an<br />
underground tunnel, a sea <strong>of</strong> vacant lots, and a severely strapped treasury. 145<br />
In response to this fiasco, the <strong>City</strong> Council voted <strong>in</strong> April to assume the duties <strong>of</strong> the Urban Renewal<br />
Agency itself. In February 1972, the Agency presented its new plan for the redevelopment area. Under<br />
this plan, the area would be anchored by a conference/community center with adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g hotel and<br />
park<strong>in</strong>g, with additional commercial and historical properties on the periphery. The agency also<br />
abandoned the s<strong>in</strong>gle developer approach, opt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stead to market the land as separ<strong>at</strong>e parcels. This<br />
decision led to a “steady and methodical flow <strong>of</strong> development” over the next six years. 146<br />
In June 1972, the <strong>City</strong> selected Oakland architectural firm Van Bourg/Nakamura to compile prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
plans for the conference center and hotel complex. A developer for the hotel was chosen the next<br />
month. As part <strong>of</strong> a 1973 redesign <strong>in</strong>tended to better harmonize the build<strong>in</strong>g with its historical<br />
surround<strong>in</strong>gs, the height, mass and bulk <strong>of</strong> the proposed conference center were reduced and the<br />
proposed 1,400‐se<strong>at</strong> the<strong>at</strong>er was removed. The groundbreak<strong>in</strong>g for the $8 million Cultural Conference<br />
Center was held on January 20, 1975. The conference center and hotel fundamentally altered the street<br />
p<strong>at</strong>tern <strong>in</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong>, with both Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal and Alvarado Street term<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> Del Monte<br />
Avenue, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong> the Custom House as they had historically.<br />
In 1975, construction began on the Paseo de Alvarado commercial complex, and a developer was<br />
chosen for the 4‐acre “Heritage Harbor” project. Federal <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the Custom House<br />
Redevelopment Project was formally ended <strong>in</strong> April 1977. Construction began l<strong>at</strong>er th<strong>at</strong> year on both<br />
Heritage Harbor and the 850‐space Custom House Garage. 147<br />
142 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 16, 17, 20, 23.<br />
143 “Renewal Demolition: Build<strong>in</strong>gs Fall<strong>in</strong>g on Lower Alvarado.”<br />
144 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 21‐27.<br />
145 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 32.<br />
146 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 32‐33.<br />
147 Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 34, 37, 39.<br />
89
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
10.2 Summary <strong>of</strong> Significant Themes<br />
Development <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g WWII and the postwar era is important because it reflects the growth<br />
th<strong>at</strong> resulted from <strong>Monterey</strong>’s expanded role as a military tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g center dur<strong>in</strong>g and after World War II.<br />
The city’s popul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>in</strong>creased dram<strong>at</strong>ically throughout this period, despite the unexpected crash <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sard<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> the mid‐1940s. The period is also marked by the <strong>in</strong>creased popularity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
automobile, which significantly <strong>in</strong>fluenced the form <strong>of</strong> commercial construction <strong>in</strong> the survey area.<br />
10.3 Associ<strong>at</strong>ed Property Types<br />
Commercial and Institutional Build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Several commercial build<strong>in</strong>gs were constructed along Upper Alvarado <strong>in</strong> the 1940s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>at</strong> 429, 432, 452, 454, 458, 462, 464, 481 and 482 Alvarado Street. These build<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />
generally much simpler and smaller than the commercial build<strong>in</strong>gs th<strong>at</strong> were constructed along Alvarado<br />
Street <strong>in</strong> the early twentieth century. They are typically one‐ to two‐stories tall with a s<strong>in</strong>gle storefront.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> these build<strong>in</strong>gs have been significantly altered.<br />
The survey area <strong>in</strong>cludes a handful <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividually notable commercial and public build<strong>in</strong>gs from the<br />
WWII/post‐war period, constructed <strong>in</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> styles:<br />
Classical Revival: Bank <strong>of</strong> America<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g (1941), 482 Alvarado Street<br />
Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Style: <strong>Monterey</strong> Sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
and Loan (1962), 449 Alvarado Street<br />
Spanish Colonial Revival: <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Museum <strong>of</strong> Art (1944), 559 Pacific Street<br />
Modern: 492 Webster Street (1959)<br />
Bay Area Style: <strong>Monterey</strong> Herald<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g (1953), 487 Pierce Street<br />
Bay Area Style: <strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library<br />
(1951), 625 Pacific Street<br />
Automobile‐oriented Commercial Build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Automobile‐rel<strong>at</strong>ed commercial development was a major force <strong>in</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g WWII<br />
and the postwar era. While much <strong>of</strong> this growth occurred outside <strong>of</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong>, several<br />
examples <strong>of</strong> automobile‐oriented commercial development can be found with<strong>in</strong> the survey area. These<br />
properties are typically one‐ or two‐story concrete build<strong>in</strong>gs clad <strong>in</strong> stucco. They have prom<strong>in</strong>ent<br />
storefronts and signage, and are surrounded by surface park<strong>in</strong>g. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, they tend to be<br />
loc<strong>at</strong>ed on major traffic thoroughfares, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Del Monte Avenue, Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street, Pearl Street and<br />
Figueroa Street.<br />
90
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
598 Frankl<strong>in</strong> Street (1957) 244 Pearl Street (1954) 447 Figueroa Street (1940)<br />
In addition, the survey <strong>in</strong>cludes several mid‐century commercial build<strong>in</strong>gs th<strong>at</strong>, while architecturally<br />
unexceptional, clearly reference the scale and form <strong>of</strong> the Spanish Colonial and <strong>Monterey</strong> Colonial<br />
styles. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude the build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>at</strong> 542 Abrego Street, 409 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal, and 533 Hartnell Street.<br />
542 Abrego Street (1965) 490 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal (1941) 533 Hartnell Street (1952)<br />
Properties Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Custom House Redevelopment Plan<br />
In approxim<strong>at</strong>e order <strong>of</strong> construction, the survey area <strong>in</strong>cludes the follow<strong>in</strong>g properties associ<strong>at</strong>ed with<br />
the large‐scale redevelopment <strong>of</strong> downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> <strong>in</strong> the 1960s and 1970s:<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Sav<strong>in</strong>gs and Loan, 449 Alvarado Street (1962)<br />
Burkett Bank Build<strong>in</strong>g, 401 Alvarado Street (1966)<br />
Troia’s Market, 350 Pacific Street (1966)<br />
Casa Fuente, 434 Pacific Street (1966)<br />
434 Alvarado Street (1968)<br />
440 Alvarado Street (1968)<br />
Custom House Plaza (1969)<br />
San Diego Federal Sav<strong>in</strong>gs, 315 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal (1972)<br />
362 Pacific Street (1974)<br />
Paseo de Alvarado , 301 Alvarado Street (1975)<br />
Portola Plaza (1976)<br />
Custom House Garage, 340 Tyler Street (1977)<br />
Heritage Harbor, 99 Pacific Street (1977)<br />
Heritage Harbor Garage, 100 Pacific Street (1977)<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Conference Center, 1 Portola Plaza (1977)<br />
Portola Plaza Hotel, 2 Portola Plaza (1978)<br />
None <strong>of</strong> these properties has yet reached 50 years <strong>of</strong> age, and only four properties have reached 45<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age. Given this, it should be noted th<strong>at</strong> properties less than 50 years <strong>of</strong> age need to s<strong>at</strong>isfy<br />
Criteria Consider<strong>at</strong>ion G <strong>in</strong> order to be eligible for the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register <strong>of</strong> Historic Places.<br />
91
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
NRHP Criteria Consider<strong>at</strong>ion G<br />
The N<strong>at</strong>ional Register <strong>of</strong> Historic Places generally excludes properties th<strong>at</strong> have achieved significance<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the past fifty years unless those properties are <strong>of</strong> exceptional importance. Fifty years is a general<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the time needed to develop historical perspective and to evalu<strong>at</strong>e significance. This<br />
consider<strong>at</strong>ion guards aga<strong>in</strong>st the list<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g contemporary <strong>in</strong>terest and ensures th<strong>at</strong><br />
the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register is a list <strong>of</strong> truly historic places. The phrase “exceptional importance” may be<br />
applied to the extraord<strong>in</strong>ary importance <strong>of</strong> an event or to an entire c<strong>at</strong>egory <strong>of</strong> resources so fragile th<strong>at</strong><br />
survivors <strong>of</strong> any age are unusual. The phrase “exceptional importance” does not require th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
property be <strong>of</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ional significance. It is a measure <strong>of</strong> a property’s importance with<strong>in</strong> the appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />
historic context, whether the scale <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> context is local, st<strong>at</strong>e, or n<strong>at</strong>ional. 148<br />
Residential Build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
The dwell<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>Monterey</strong>’s expansion dur<strong>in</strong>g and after WWII are<br />
typically modest and represent vernacular examples r<strong>at</strong>her than high‐style examples <strong>of</strong> mid‐century<br />
forms and styles. Nearly all <strong>of</strong> the residential structures with<strong>in</strong> the survey area from this period are<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imal Traditional <strong>in</strong> style. They are generally loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the eastern portion <strong>of</strong> the survey area, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
area orig<strong>in</strong>ally pl<strong>at</strong>ted as the Rob<strong>in</strong>son Subdivision.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imal Traditional<br />
The M<strong>in</strong>imal Traditional style emerged <strong>in</strong> the United St<strong>at</strong>es dur<strong>in</strong>g the mid‐1930s and was most<br />
prevalent <strong>in</strong> the years follow<strong>in</strong>g WWII. A response to the Gre<strong>at</strong> Depression, the M<strong>in</strong>imal Traditional style<br />
was conceived and developed by agencies and associ<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Federal Hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ion (FHA) and the N<strong>at</strong>ional Associ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Real‐est<strong>at</strong>e Boards, and by manufacturers and<br />
modern community builders who promoted and f<strong>in</strong>anced the construction <strong>of</strong> efficient, mass‐produced<br />
and affordable houses. The style was loosely based on the Eclectic revival styles <strong>of</strong> the 1920s and 30s,<br />
but with much less ornament<strong>at</strong>ion and decor<strong>at</strong>ive detail<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
544 Anthony Street (1953) 555 Anthony Street (1956) 501 Figueroa Street (1951)<br />
476 Jackson Street (1959) 329 Van Buren Street (1963)<br />
148 N<strong>at</strong>ional Park Service, How to Apply the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register Criteria for Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion, 41‐43.<br />
92
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
Common character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>imal Traditional‐style build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the survey area<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Stucco cladd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Hipped ro<strong>of</strong><br />
M<strong>in</strong>imal ornament<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Rectangular w<strong>in</strong>dows <strong>in</strong> paired or tripartite assemblies<br />
Partial‐width porch, <strong>of</strong>ten recessed<br />
Wood porch posts<br />
Residential Landscapes<br />
A handful <strong>of</strong> properties with<strong>in</strong> the survey area fe<strong>at</strong>ure gardens associ<strong>at</strong>ed with famous designers. Three<br />
properties with<strong>in</strong> the survey area have garden landscapes designed by noted landscape architect and<br />
movie set designer Florence Yoch. These <strong>in</strong>clude gardens <strong>at</strong> Casa Abrego (1955), Casa Alvarado (1955)<br />
and the Doud House (1970), Yoch’s f<strong>in</strong>al garden. Renowned Chicago architect David Adler and his sister,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terior decor<strong>at</strong>or Francis Elk<strong>in</strong>s designed the Casa Amesti gardens sometime before 1951. 149<br />
Significance and Integrity<br />
In order to be eligible for list<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the local, st<strong>at</strong>e, or n<strong>at</strong>ional historic register, WWII‐ and postwar‐era<br />
properties <strong>in</strong> the Downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> survey area must be significant under <strong>at</strong> least one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria.<br />
NRHP Criterion A/CRHR Criterion 1 (Events, P<strong>at</strong>terns and Trends)<br />
A property from the WWII‐ and postwar‐period <strong>in</strong> the Downtown <strong>Monterey</strong> survey area may be<br />
significant under Criterion A/1 for its associ<strong>at</strong>ion with the <strong>City</strong>’s ongo<strong>in</strong>g growth and development<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g this period. A property may also be significant for its associ<strong>at</strong>ion with the expanded military<br />
presence <strong>in</strong> the area before or after WWII.<br />
NRHP Criterion B/CRHR Criterion 2 (Person)<br />
A property may be significant under Criterion B/2 if it is found to be associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the life <strong>of</strong> a<br />
significant member <strong>of</strong> mid‐century <strong>Monterey</strong>, such as a prom<strong>in</strong>ent merchant or pr<strong>of</strong>essional, or an<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluential civic or community leader. Note, however, th<strong>at</strong> a residence eligible under Criterion B/2<br />
should be the best or only rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g represent<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the person’s <strong>in</strong>fluence or achievements and not<br />
simply their place <strong>of</strong> residence.<br />
NRHP Criterion C/CRHR Criterion 3 (Design/Construction)<br />
A commercial property may be significant under Criterion C/3 as an example <strong>of</strong> an important midcentury<br />
architectural style, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Intern<strong>at</strong>ional, Bay Area, Modern and Spanish Colonial Revival.<br />
Properties may also be significant under this criterion if they are associ<strong>at</strong>ed with a master architect. The<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Public Library (625 Pacific) and the <strong>Monterey</strong> Herald Build<strong>in</strong>g (487 Pierce Street), for example,<br />
may be significant for their associ<strong>at</strong>ion with William Wurster, one <strong>of</strong> the key developers <strong>of</strong> the Bay Area<br />
Style. The residences <strong>in</strong> the survey area from this period are typically vernacular r<strong>at</strong>her than high‐style<br />
examples; as such, these residences are unlikely to qualify <strong>in</strong>dividually under this criterion, but may be<br />
potential contributors to a district. Residences <strong>in</strong> the survey area are not likely to be significant under<br />
this criterion as the work <strong>of</strong> a master, as most were not architect‐designed.<br />
149 Yoch, 129‐133.<br />
93
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Integrity Consider<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
In order to be eligible for list<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the local, st<strong>at</strong>e, or n<strong>at</strong>ional historic register, a property must reta<strong>in</strong><br />
sufficient <strong>in</strong>tegrity to convey its significance as part <strong>of</strong> the WWII‐ and postwar‐theme. A property th<strong>at</strong><br />
has sufficient <strong>in</strong>tegrity will reta<strong>in</strong> a majority <strong>of</strong> the character‐def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fe<strong>at</strong>ures listed above. A property<br />
significant under Criterion A/1 should have <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ion, design, sett<strong>in</strong>g, and feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum. A residence significant under Criterion B/2 should reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> associ<strong>at</strong>ion, design, and<br />
feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum because retention <strong>of</strong> the physical fe<strong>at</strong>ures th<strong>at</strong> convey the property’s<br />
connection to a significant person is critical. L<strong>at</strong>er alter<strong>at</strong>ions may not affect the <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> properties<br />
significant under this criterion if the significant person was still connected to the property when the<br />
alter<strong>at</strong>ions were completed. Integrity <strong>of</strong> design, m<strong>at</strong>erials, workmanship, and feel<strong>in</strong>g are the key aspects<br />
for a property to convey its significance under Criterion C/3. If the property is significant under this<br />
criterion as an example <strong>of</strong> an early American‐era architectural style, it is possible for some m<strong>at</strong>erials to<br />
be replaced without drastically dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g the property’s overall <strong>in</strong>tegrity, as long as these alter<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
are subord<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>e to the overall character <strong>of</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g. For example, a residence may reta<strong>in</strong> sufficient<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrity if it has undergone m<strong>in</strong>or alter<strong>at</strong>ions (i.e. w<strong>in</strong>dow replacement or alter<strong>at</strong>ions to the stairs),<br />
while a similar property which had been substantially changed (i.e. stripped <strong>of</strong> its wood ornament, reclad<br />
<strong>in</strong> stucco, or given a second story addition) may not qualify.<br />
94
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
11. Recommend<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
11.1 Revised NHLD Inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
On April 15, 1970, the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town Historic District was design<strong>at</strong>ed a N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark<br />
(NHL) by the N<strong>at</strong>ional Park Service (NPS). S<strong>in</strong>ce th<strong>at</strong> time, NPS has adopted amendments to the N<strong>at</strong>ional<br />
Historic Preserv<strong>at</strong>ion Act th<strong>at</strong> require nom<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ions to <strong>in</strong>clude more extensive historical background<br />
<strong>in</strong>form<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g identific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> historic themes, landscape fe<strong>at</strong>ures, and the loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />
significant historic events. The context st<strong>at</strong>ement <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this document is <strong>in</strong>tended to address any<br />
such deficiencies <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g NHLD document<strong>at</strong>ion. In addition, the exist<strong>in</strong>g NHLD document<strong>at</strong>ion:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Does not identify a period <strong>of</strong> significance for the district;<br />
Includes, for the south portion, a mapped boundary th<strong>at</strong> does not m<strong>at</strong>ch the boundary<br />
described <strong>in</strong> the text; and<br />
Does not system<strong>at</strong>ically identify district contributors and non‐contributors.<br />
NHLD Period <strong>of</strong> Significance<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ional Register <strong>of</strong> Historic Places guidel<strong>in</strong>es def<strong>in</strong>e period <strong>of</strong> significance as “the length <strong>of</strong> time when a<br />
property was associ<strong>at</strong>ed with important events, activities, or persons, or <strong>at</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed the characteristics<br />
which qualify it for N<strong>at</strong>ional Register list<strong>in</strong>g.” 150 The <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town District has been design<strong>at</strong>ed a<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark because <strong>of</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the<br />
city’s historic role as the commercial and political capital <strong>of</strong> Spanish, Mexican, and Early American<br />
California. In ARG’s pr<strong>of</strong>essional op<strong>in</strong>ion, the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town NHLD’s period <strong>of</strong> significance extends<br />
from the found<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Presidio <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> and Mission San Carlos Borromeo <strong>in</strong> 1770 until 1860, by<br />
which time <strong>Monterey</strong> no longer played a dom<strong>in</strong>ant role <strong>in</strong> the cultural and economic life <strong>of</strong> California, as<br />
the st<strong>at</strong>e’s political and commercial centers had moved elsewhere.<br />
NHLD Boundaries<br />
In conjunction with conduct<strong>in</strong>g the field survey and historical research, ARG reviewed the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town NHLD for consistency and completeness. In particular, ARG<br />
evalu<strong>at</strong>ed whether the boundaries could be expanded to <strong>in</strong>clude any adjacent or nearby properties th<strong>at</strong><br />
appeared significant with<strong>in</strong> the historic context <strong>of</strong> the district and d<strong>at</strong>e from the district’s period <strong>of</strong><br />
significance.<br />
Based on our review <strong>of</strong> extant properties, we agree th<strong>at</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town NHLD consists <strong>of</strong> two<br />
discont<strong>in</strong>uous areas th<strong>at</strong> are characterized by a concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs from the Mexican and early<br />
American periods. The Downtown Reconnaissance Survey Area <strong>in</strong>cludes several properties outside the<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> the NHLD th<strong>at</strong> d<strong>at</strong>e from the NHLD’s period <strong>of</strong> significance, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Capitular Hall<br />
Casa Abrego<br />
Casa Estrada<br />
Casa Madariaga<br />
Casa Pacheco<br />
Casa Sanchez<br />
Casa Serrano<br />
150 N<strong>at</strong>ional Park Service, How to Complete the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register Registr<strong>at</strong>ion Form, 42.<br />
95
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Casa Soberanes<br />
Fremont Adobe<br />
Lara‐Soto Adobe<br />
Merritt House<br />
Osio‐Rodriguez Adobe<br />
Royal Presidio Chapel<br />
Stevenson House<br />
These properties, however, are sc<strong>at</strong>tered throughout the survey area, and no subset <strong>of</strong> them exhibits<br />
sufficient geographic concentr<strong>at</strong>ion to warrant tre<strong>at</strong>ment as a third NHLD sub‐area. Nor, with one<br />
exception, are any <strong>of</strong> these properties sufficiently close to the exist<strong>in</strong>g NHLD boundaries th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
boundaries should be adjusted to <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong>e them. The one exception is the Fremont Adobe <strong>at</strong> 539<br />
Hartnell Street, which is just south <strong>of</strong> the Gabriel de la Torre Adobe <strong>at</strong> 509 Hartnell Street. 151<br />
The current boundary for the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the NHLD <strong>in</strong>cludes several houses along Van Buren<br />
and Madison Streets th<strong>at</strong> d<strong>at</strong>e from the l<strong>at</strong>e n<strong>in</strong>eteenth or early twentieth centuries. As summarized <strong>in</strong><br />
the second table below, these houses were built after the NHLD’s period <strong>of</strong> significance and thus should<br />
not be considered contributors to the NHLD. As a result, we recommend the western and southern<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> this portion <strong>of</strong> the NHLD be modified to exclude those properties. We also recommend<br />
th<strong>at</strong> the park<strong>in</strong>g lot between the Vasquez Adobe and these non‐contribut<strong>in</strong>g properties be excluded<br />
from the district.<br />
Figure 11‐1. The current boundary <strong>of</strong> the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark<br />
District is outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> orange; the proposed boundary is shown <strong>in</strong> blue.<br />
151 The Perry‐Downer House <strong>at</strong> 201 Van Buren Street, immedi<strong>at</strong>ely adjacent to the northern NHLD boundary, has been<br />
extensively altered s<strong>in</strong>ce its 1860 construction and is thus not eligible for <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> the NHLD.<br />
96
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
In summary, we conclude th<strong>at</strong> the boundary <strong>of</strong> the northern portion <strong>of</strong> the NHLD requires no alter<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
but th<strong>at</strong> the boundary <strong>of</strong> the southern portion should be modified <strong>in</strong> two ways:<br />
<br />
<br />
The NHLD boundary should be expanded to <strong>in</strong>clude the Fremont Adobe <strong>at</strong> 539 Hartnell Street<br />
and, for cont<strong>in</strong>uity’s sake, the non‐historic property <strong>at</strong> 533 Hartnell Street.<br />
The portion <strong>of</strong> the NHLD boundary along Van Buren Street between Jefferson and Madison<br />
Streets should be shifted eastward to <strong>in</strong>clude only the parcels <strong>at</strong> 510, 520, 526, and 546 Dutra<br />
Street. The park<strong>in</strong>g lot th<strong>at</strong> shares a parcel with the Vasquez Adobe <strong>at</strong> 546 Dutra Street should<br />
be excluded from the NHLD.<br />
NHLD Contributors and Non‐contributors<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g tables specify the contributor/non‐contributor st<strong>at</strong>us <strong>of</strong> each property with<strong>in</strong> the two<br />
portions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town N<strong>at</strong>ional Historical Landmark District.<br />
Northern NHLD Boundary<br />
APN Address Name/Description<br />
Year<br />
Built<br />
Contributor/<br />
Non‐contributor Notes<br />
001557018<strong>000</strong> 1 Custom House Plaza Custom House 1820s Contributor<br />
00156701<strong>000</strong>0 5 Custom House Plaza History & Maritime Museum Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001567008<strong>000</strong> 8 Custom House Plaza Pacific House 1847 Contributor<br />
001557027<strong>000</strong> 136 Olivier Street Heritage Harbor 1956 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001567021<strong>000</strong> <strong>200</strong> Olivier Street St<strong>at</strong>e Park Offices (2 build<strong>in</strong>gs) Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001567021<strong>000</strong> <strong>200</strong> Olivier Street Casa Del Oro 1845 Contributor<br />
0015670<strong>200</strong>00 220 Olivier Street Duarte Store 1865 Non‐contributor moved<br />
0015670<strong>200</strong>00 230 Olivier Street Thomas Cole House 1856 Contributor<br />
001557026<strong>000</strong> 99 Pacific Street Heritage Harbor 1977 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001551015<strong>000</strong> 100 Pacific Street Heritage Harbor park<strong>in</strong>g garage 1977 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001557025<strong>000</strong> 125 Pacific Street Old Whal<strong>in</strong>g St<strong>at</strong>ion 1847 Contributor<br />
001557025<strong>000</strong> 125 Pacific Street First Brick House 1847 Contributor<br />
00156800<strong>200</strong>0 202 Pacific Street California’s First The<strong>at</strong>er 1845/ Contributor<br />
1847<br />
00156800<strong>200</strong>0 439 Scott Street priv<strong>at</strong>e residence Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001551016<strong>000</strong> 155 Van Buren Street St. James Episcopal Church/ 1876 Non‐contributor moved<br />
Mayo Hayes O’Donnell Library<br />
001551016<strong>000</strong> 177 Van Buren Street Doud House 1852 Contributor<br />
97
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Southern NHLD Boundary<br />
APN Address Name/Description<br />
Year<br />
Built<br />
Contributor/<br />
Non‐contributor Notes<br />
001572019<strong>000</strong> 486‐488 Alvarado St. commercial build<strong>in</strong>g Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001572019<strong>000</strong> 490‐498 Alvarado St. Alvarado Adobe 1834 Contributor<br />
0015250<strong>200</strong>00 510 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Lark<strong>in</strong> House 1835 Contributor<br />
0015250<strong>200</strong>00 510 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Sherman’s Headquarters 1834 Contributor<br />
001525003<strong>000</strong> 540 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal House <strong>of</strong> the Four W<strong>in</strong>ds 1840 Contributor<br />
001525003<strong>000</strong> 540 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>Monterey</strong> Civic Club Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001571001<strong>000</strong> 565 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1905 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001525005<strong>000</strong> 580 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Miller Adobe 1874 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001525006<strong>000</strong> 590 Calle Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Casa Gutierrez 1841 Contributor<br />
00152<strong>200</strong>4<strong>000</strong> 510 Dutra Street Casa Alvarado 1830 Contributor<br />
001522014<strong>000</strong> 520 Dutra Street priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1874 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001522014<strong>000</strong> 526 Dutra Street priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1874 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001522015<strong>000</strong> 546 Dutra Street Vasquez Adobe 1840 Contributor<br />
001591048<strong>000</strong> 500 Hartnell Street Stokes Adobe 1833 Contributor<br />
001581011<strong>000</strong> 509 Hartnell Street First Federal Courthouse/ 1841 Contributor<br />
Gabriel de la Torre Adobe<br />
00158101<strong>000</strong>0 533 Hartnell Street 1952 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
0015810<strong>200</strong>00 539 Hartnell Street Fremont Adobe 1850 Contributor<br />
00152<strong>200</strong>3<strong>000</strong> Jefferson Street* vacant Non‐contributor vacant<br />
001525009<strong>000</strong> 232 Madison Street priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1905 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001522015<strong>000</strong> 424 Madison Street* priv<strong>at</strong>e residence Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001522011<strong>000</strong> 450 Madison Street* priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1888 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
00158102<strong>200</strong>0 508 Munras Avenue Cooper‐Molera Adobe 1826 Contributor<br />
00152500<strong>200</strong>0 535 Pacific Street Masonic Lodge 1915 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001525021<strong>000</strong> 559 Pacific Street <strong>Monterey</strong> Museum <strong>of</strong> Art 1944 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
00152400<strong>200</strong>0 570 Pacific Street Colton Hall 1849 Contributor<br />
00152400<strong>200</strong>0 570 Pacific Street Underwood‐Brown Adobe 1845 Contributor<br />
00152400<strong>200</strong>0 570 Pacific Street Old Jail 1854 Contributor<br />
00152400<strong>200</strong>0 570 Pacific Street Few Memorial Hall 1935 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001551001<strong>000</strong> Pacific Street Friendly Plaza Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001523001<strong>000</strong> 502 Pierce Street Casa de la Torre 1852 Contributor<br />
00152300<strong>200</strong>0 512 Pierce Street Ketchum Studio Non‐contributor moved<br />
001523003<strong>000</strong> 526 Pierce Street Gordon House 1849 Contributor<br />
001571005<strong>000</strong> 500‐512 Polk Street Pioneer Bakery 1892 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
00157100<strong>200</strong>0 516 Polk Street Casa Amesti 1834 Contributor<br />
001581001<strong>000</strong> 525 Polk Street Cooper‐Molera Barn 1893 Contributor<br />
00158101<strong>200</strong>0 571‐575 Polk Street priv<strong>at</strong>e residences 1905 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001571001<strong>000</strong> 580 Polk Street commercial build<strong>in</strong>g Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001575001<strong>000</strong> Tyler Street Bus Term<strong>in</strong>al ‐ Plaza Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
00152<strong>200</strong>1<strong>000</strong> Van Buren Street* vacant Non‐contributor vacant<br />
00152<strong>200</strong><strong>200</strong>0 505 Van Buren Street* vacant Non‐contributor vacant<br />
00152<strong>200</strong>5<strong>000</strong> 513 Van Buren Street* priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1905 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
001522013<strong>000</strong> 527 Van Buren Street* priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1892 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
00152<strong>200</strong>9<strong>000</strong> 587 Van Buren Street* priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1888 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
00152201<strong>000</strong>0 593 Van Buren Street* priv<strong>at</strong>e residence 1888 Non‐contributor built after POS<br />
Note: Properties marked with an “*” are outside the proposed revised boundary for the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town NHLD.<br />
98
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Nearly all <strong>of</strong> the contributors identified above are called out by name <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g NHLD nom<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
The only exceptions are the follow<strong>in</strong>g additional contributors identified by ARG th<strong>at</strong> appear significant<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the historic context <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Old Town NHLD and d<strong>at</strong>e from its period <strong>of</strong> significance:<br />
<br />
<br />
Thomas Cole House (230 Olivier Street)<br />
This two‐and‐one‐half story redwood framed, side gabled residence d<strong>at</strong>es from 1856. A 1997<br />
evalu<strong>at</strong>ion conducted by Kent Seavey concluded th<strong>at</strong> the Thomas Cole House is architecturally<br />
significant as one <strong>of</strong> the only rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tact examples <strong>of</strong> a wood frame residence from the<br />
1850s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. 152 While the orig<strong>in</strong>al one‐and‐one‐half story build<strong>in</strong>g was raised one story c.<br />
1890, its architectural rarity warrants <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> the NHLD despite its reduced <strong>in</strong>tegrity.<br />
Fremont Adobe (539 Hartnell Street)<br />
A 1998 evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this build<strong>in</strong>g found th<strong>at</strong>, though not actually associ<strong>at</strong>ed with General<br />
Fremont, the build<strong>in</strong>g is significant for its associ<strong>at</strong>ion with two early California military families,<br />
the Escobar and Vasquez families. 153 In addition, the adobe is one <strong>of</strong> only a few th<strong>at</strong> were<br />
covered with we<strong>at</strong>her board<strong>in</strong>g for protection from the elements. (Other examples <strong>in</strong> the NHLD<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude Casa Alvarado and Casa de la Torre.) As a consequence, the 1998 evalu<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
recommended the build<strong>in</strong>g be added as a contributor to the NHLD.<br />
11.2 Further Historical Research<br />
Properties Merit<strong>in</strong>g Individual Document<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
<br />
Potential Historic Districts<br />
<br />
152 Seavey.<br />
153 Kimbro (1998), 9.<br />
99
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
11. Bibliography<br />
. “<strong>City</strong> Manager Answers Questions on Future <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> Baseball Park.” <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula<br />
Herald. April 6, 1954.<br />
. History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> County, California. San Francisco, CA: Elliott & Moore, Publishers, 1881.<br />
. “New Ball Park Plans Approved by Council.” <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Herald. December 7, 1956.<br />
. “No Action on Destruction <strong>of</strong> Old Ball Park <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>.” <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Herald. March<br />
31, 1954.<br />
. “Renewal Demolition: Build<strong>in</strong>gs Fall<strong>in</strong>g on Lower Alvarado.” <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Herald.<br />
November 14, 1974.<br />
. “Urban Renewal New Look for <strong>Monterey</strong>.” <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Herald. July 14, 1960.<br />
Abrahamson, Eric. Historic <strong>Monterey</strong>: California’s Forgotten First Capital. Sacramento, CA: California<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Parks and Recre<strong>at</strong>ion, 1989.<br />
Architectural Resources Group. “Fort Ord, East Garrison, Historical Resources Report.” Architectural<br />
Resources Group, May <strong>200</strong>3.<br />
Architectural Resources Group. “Historical Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion, Southern Pacific Railroad Sites, <strong>Monterey</strong>, CA.”<br />
Architectural Resources Group, December 1999.<br />
Archives & Architecture, Reconnaissance Historic Survey, Lower Old Town, <strong>Monterey</strong>, California.<br />
Prepared for the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, February <strong>200</strong>6.<br />
Baer, Morley, Augusta F<strong>in</strong>k and Amelie Elk<strong>in</strong>gton. Adobes <strong>in</strong> the Sun: Portraits <strong>of</strong> a Tranquil Era. San<br />
Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1980.<br />
Brown, Thomas A. “The Landscape <strong>of</strong> Early <strong>Monterey</strong>.” In The <strong>Monterey</strong> Mesa: Oldest Neighborhood <strong>in</strong><br />
California, edited by Julianne Burton‐Carvajal, 1‐10. <strong>Monterey</strong>, CA: <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, <strong>200</strong>2.<br />
Burton‐Carvajal, Julianne. “Reviv<strong>in</strong>g the Mesa <strong>in</strong> the 1920s: J.C. Anthony’s Sense <strong>of</strong> Place.” In The<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Mesa: Oldest Neighborhood <strong>in</strong> California, edited by Julianne Burton‐Carvajal, 43‐80.<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong>, CA: <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, <strong>200</strong>2.<br />
Conway, J.D. <strong>Monterey</strong>: Presidio, Pueblo, and Port. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publish<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>200</strong>3.<br />
Coventry, Kim. <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula: The Golden Age. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publish<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>200</strong>2.<br />
Delk<strong>in</strong>, James Ladd. A Guide to the <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. American Guide Series, Work Projects<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ion. San Francisco: Hooper Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Co., 1946.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>k, Augusta. <strong>Monterey</strong> County: The Dram<strong>at</strong>ic Story <strong>of</strong> its Past. Santa Cruz, CA: Western Tanager Press,<br />
1982.<br />
100
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
Hemp, Michael K. Cannery Row: The History <strong>of</strong> John Ste<strong>in</strong>beck’s Old Ocean View Avenue. <strong>Monterey</strong>: The<br />
History Company, <strong>200</strong>9.<br />
Hicks, John and Reg<strong>in</strong>a Hicks. <strong>Monterey</strong>: A Pictorial History. Carmel, CA: Cre<strong>at</strong>ive Books, 1973.<br />
Howard, Donald M. An<strong>at</strong>omy <strong>of</strong> Alvarado Street, <strong>Monterey</strong>, 1920 to <strong>200</strong>7. Pacific Grove, CA: <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Historiography Press, <strong>200</strong>7.<br />
Howard, Donald M. Key to the <strong>City</strong>: Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the Old Pueblo 1835‐1935. Pacific Grove, CA: <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Historiography Press, <strong>200</strong>2.<br />
Howard, Donald M. Cowp<strong>at</strong>h to Ma<strong>in</strong> Drag: <strong>Monterey</strong>’s Alvarado Street, A Bus<strong>in</strong>ess History, 1830‐1930.<br />
Pacific Grove, CA: Donald M. Howard, 1996.<br />
Johnston, Robert B. Old <strong>Monterey</strong> County: A Pictorial History. <strong>Monterey</strong>, CA: <strong>Monterey</strong> Sav<strong>in</strong>gs and Loan<br />
Associ<strong>at</strong>ion, 1970.<br />
Karas, Judy. “Alvarado Street: The Golden Years.” Alta Vista Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>Monterey</strong> County Herald. March<br />
17, 1991.<br />
Kimbro, Edna E. “Spanish‐Era Settlement <strong>of</strong> the Mesa, 1795‐1822.” In The <strong>Monterey</strong> Mesa: Oldest<br />
Neighborhood <strong>in</strong> California, edited by Julianne Burton‐Carvajal, 11‐26. <strong>Monterey</strong>, CA: <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>,<br />
<strong>200</strong>2.<br />
Kimbro, Edna E. Historic Structure Report, Royal Presidio Chapel, <strong>Monterey</strong>, California. Historical:<br />
Architectural: Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Research, March 1999.<br />
Kimbro, Edna E. Preserv<strong>at</strong>ion Program & “M<strong>in</strong>i” Historic Structure Report for the Fremont Adobe, 539<br />
Hartnell Street, <strong>Monterey</strong>, California. Historical: Architectural: Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Research Consultant,<br />
June 15, 1998.<br />
Knowland, Joseph R. California, A Landmark History. Oakland, CA: Tribune Press, 1941.<br />
Lydon, Sandy. The Japanese <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Bay Region: A Brief History. Capitola, CA: Capitola Book Co,<br />
1997.<br />
Lydon, Sandy. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Gold: The Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Bay Region. Capitola, CA: Capitola Book Co,<br />
1985.<br />
Mangelsdorf, Tom. A History <strong>of</strong> Ste<strong>in</strong>beck’s Cannery Row. Santa Cruz, CA: Western Tanager Press, 1986.<br />
Margol<strong>in</strong>, Malcolm. The Ohlone Way: Indian Life <strong>in</strong> the San Francisco‐<strong>Monterey</strong> Bay Area. Berkeley:<br />
Heyday Books, 1978.<br />
McAlester, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, and A L. McAlester. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Knopf, 1984.<br />
McClure, James D. California Landmarks: A Photographic Guide to the St<strong>at</strong>e’s Historic Spots. Stanford,<br />
CA: Stanford University Press, 1948.<br />
101
N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark District<br />
Architectural Resources Group<br />
Downtown Area Context St<strong>at</strong>ement and Reconnaissance Survey REVISED DRAFT, April 2011<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Found<strong>at</strong>ion. Old <strong>Monterey</strong>, Doorway to History. <strong>Monterey</strong>, CA: H.S. Crocker Co., 1951.<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Museum <strong>of</strong> Art. Architecture <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. <strong>Monterey</strong>, CA: <strong>Monterey</strong><br />
Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Museum <strong>of</strong> Art, 1976.<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ional Park Service. How to Apply the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register Criteria for Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC:<br />
United St<strong>at</strong>es Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, 1997.<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ional Park Service. How to Complete the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register Registr<strong>at</strong>ion Form. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC:<br />
United St<strong>at</strong>es Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, 1997.<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ional Park Service. How to Prepare N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Landmark Nom<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ions. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: United<br />
St<strong>at</strong>es Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, 1999.<br />
Nomell<strong>in</strong>i, Elizabeth and Jane Ann Wileman. A Comprehensive Survey <strong>of</strong> Architectural Resources <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. Prepared for the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g Department. September 1, 1977.<br />
O’Donnell, Mayo Hayes. “History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong> Ball Park.” <strong>Monterey</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sula Herald. n.d.<br />
Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. Custom House Redevelopment Project: A History, 1957‐<br />
1977. Redevelopment Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 1978.<br />
Seavey, Kent. “DPR 523A and 523B forms, Thomas Cole House, 230 Olivier Street.” Recorded for<br />
<strong>Monterey</strong> Historic Resource Inventory, November 15, 1997.<br />
Thomas, Tim, and Dennis Copeland. <strong>Monterey</strong>’s W<strong>at</strong>erfront. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publish<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>200</strong>6.<br />
Van Nostrand, Jeanne. A Pictorial and Narr<strong>at</strong>ive History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, Adobe Capital <strong>of</strong> California, 1770‐<br />
1847. San Francisco: California Historical Society, 1968.<br />
Urban Renewal Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. Redevelopment Plan for the Custom House<br />
Redevelopment Project. Urban Renewal Agency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>, 19<strong>61</strong> (amended 1965, 1967,<br />
1970, 1972).<br />
Uhrowczik, Peter. The Burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>: The 1818 Attack on California by the Priv<strong>at</strong>eer Bouchard.<br />
Los G<strong>at</strong>os, CA: Cyril Books, <strong>200</strong>1.<br />
Walton, John. Storied Land: Community and Memory <strong>in</strong> <strong>Monterey</strong>. Berkeley: University <strong>of</strong> California<br />
Press, <strong>200</strong>1.<br />
Woodbridge, Sally B. California Architecture: Historic American Build<strong>in</strong>gs Survey. San Francisco: Chronicle<br />
Books, 1988.<br />
Yoch, James J. Landscap<strong>in</strong>g the American Dream: The Gardens and Film Sets <strong>of</strong> Florence Yoch. New York:<br />
H.N. Abrams, 1989.<br />
102