15.11.2014 Views

Lecture notes for Introduction to Representation Theory

Lecture notes for Introduction to Representation Theory

Lecture notes for Introduction to Representation Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proof. (i) Let us decompose V = V (O,U) as an A-module. Then we get<br />

V = yO V y ,<br />

where V y = {v V (O,U) |av = (y, a)v, a A}. (Equivalently, V y = {v V (O,U) |v(g) = 0 unless gy =<br />

x}). So if W → V is a subrepresentation, then W = yO W y , where W y → V y . Now, V y is a<br />

representation of G y , which goes <strong>to</strong> U under any isomorphism G y ⊃ G x determined by g G<br />

mapping x <strong>to</strong> y. Hence, V y is irreducible over G y , so W y = 0 or W y = V y <strong>for</strong> each y. Also, if hy = z<br />

then hW y = W z , so either W y = 0 <strong>for</strong> all y or W y = V y <strong>for</strong> all y, as desired.<br />

(ii) The orbit O is determined by the A-module structure of V , and the representation U by<br />

the structure of V x as a G x -module.<br />

(iii) We have<br />

<br />

dim<br />

2 V( U,O) = |O| 2 (dim U) 2 =<br />

U,O<br />

U,O<br />

<br />

|O|<br />

2 |Gx | = |O||G/G x ||G x | = |G| |O| = |G||A ∗ | = |G ∼ A|.<br />

O O O<br />

(iv) The proof is essentially the same as that of the Mackey <strong>for</strong>mula.<br />

Exercise. Redo Problems 3.17(a), 3.18, 3.22 using Theorem 4.75.<br />

Exercise. Deduce parts (i)-(iii) of Theorem 4.75 from part (iv).<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!