15.11.2014 Views

Lecture notes for Introduction to Representation Theory

Lecture notes for Introduction to Representation Theory

Lecture notes for Introduction to Representation Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 Basic notions of representation theory<br />

1.1 What is representation theory?<br />

In technical terms, representation theory studies representations of associative algebras. Its general<br />

content can be very briefly summarized as follows.<br />

An associative algebra over a field k is a vec<strong>to</strong>r space A over k equipped with an associative<br />

bilinear multiplication a, b ⊃ ab, a, b A. We will always consider associative algebras with unit,<br />

i.e., with an element 1 such that 1 · a = a · 1 = a <strong>for</strong> all a A. A basic example of an associative<br />

algebra is the algebra EndV of linear opera<strong>to</strong>rs from a vec<strong>to</strong>r space V <strong>to</strong> itself. Other important<br />

examples include algebras defined by genera<strong>to</strong>rs and relations, such as group algebras and universal<br />

enveloping algebras of Lie algebras.<br />

A representation of an associative algebra A (also called a left A-module) is a vec<strong>to</strong>r space<br />

V equipped with a homomorphism δ : A ⊃ EndV , i.e., a linear map preserving the multiplication<br />

and unit.<br />

A subrepresentation of a representation V is a subspace U → V which is invariant under all<br />

opera<strong>to</strong>rs δ(a), a A. Also, if V 1 , V 2 are two representations of A then the direct sum V 1 V 2<br />

has an obvious structure of a representation of A.<br />

A nonzero representation V of A is said <strong>to</strong> be irreducible if its only subrepresentations are<br />

0 and V itself, and indecomposable if it cannot be written as a direct sum of two nonzero<br />

subrepresentations. Obviously, irreducible implies indecomposable, but not vice versa.<br />

Typical problems of representation theory are as follows:<br />

1. Classify irreducible representations of a given algebra A.<br />

2. Classify indecomposable representations of A.<br />

3. Do 1 and 2 restricting <strong>to</strong> finite dimensional representations.<br />

As mentioned above, the algebra A is often given <strong>to</strong> us by genera<strong>to</strong>rs and relations. For<br />

example, the universal enveloping algebra U of the Lie algebra sl(2) is generated by h, e, f with<br />

defining relations<br />

he − eh = 2e, hf − fh = −2f, ef − fe = h. (1)<br />

This means that the problem of finding, say, N-dimensional representations of A reduces <strong>to</strong> solving<br />

a bunch of nonlinear algebraic equations with respect <strong>to</strong> a bunch of unknown N by N matrices,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example system (1) with respect <strong>to</strong> unknown matrices h, e, f.<br />

It is really striking that such, at first glance hopelessly complicated, systems of equations can<br />

in fact be solved completely by methods of representation theory! For example, we will prove the<br />

following theorem.<br />

Theorem 1.1. Let k = C be the field of complex numbers. Then:<br />

(i) The algebra U has exactly one irreducible representation V d of each dimension, up <strong>to</strong> equivalence;<br />

this representation is realized in the space of homogeneous polynomials of two variables x, y<br />

of degree d − 1, and defined by the <strong>for</strong>mulas<br />

<br />

δ(h) = x − y , δ(e) = x , δ(f) = y .<br />

x y y x<br />

(ii) Any indecomposable finite dimensional representation of U is irreducible. That is, any finite<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!