Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum
Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum
62 After the crisis: A new socio-economic settlement for the EU
Chapter 4 The EU budget: “not fit for purpose” but change is afoot, gradually Alan Mayhew The European Union budget is “not fit for purpose” in the global age. Its critics are numerous, from the European Parliament, across government and amongst economists, lawyers and political scientists. The criticisms are clear: First, instead of supporting new policies tackling future challenges, the budget supports a low productivity sector, agriculture, and relatively poor regions in rich countries; Second, large budget rebates to relatively rich countries, together with side payments, agreed to obtain unanimity in the Council, severely limit transparency and equity in the budget; Third, policymaking in the Union is plagued by the net budget balance concerns of member states; Fourth, the Union’s own resources are in fact transfers from the member states, which divorce the budgetary authority from the taxpayers, and which, in the electoral process, therefore divorce European parliamentarians from responsibility for expenditure; Finally, the medium-term financial framework of the Union is not subject to influence from the European Parliament and severely limits flexibility in the budget to tackle rapidly changing policy requirements. Identifying these problems is naturally far easier than curing them. The great difficulty is the need for unanimity amongst the 27 member states to make serious changes to the annual budget and the financial framework. While the overall budget is less than 1% of EU Gross National Income Chapter 4 – Alan Mayhew 63
- Page 14 and 15: Before the crash: the EU as a parti
- Page 16 and 17: liberalisation. The City of London
- Page 18 and 19: of the Financial Services Action Pl
- Page 20 and 21: confidence and world trade, to whic
- Page 22 and 23: following the ECJ’s controversial
- Page 24 and 25: signals are in place to promote a n
- Page 26 and 27: need to be constructed to create ac
- Page 28 and 29: or indeed re-impose, what they rega
- Page 30 and 31: Markets with rules The overall conc
- Page 32 and 33: 30 After the crisis: A new socio-ec
- Page 34 and 35: Target financial stability The EMU
- Page 36 and 37: Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxemb
- Page 38 and 39: mortgage banks and the insurance se
- Page 40 and 41: financial market rules. The ESFS au
- Page 42 and 43: prudential regulation - though only
- Page 44 and 45: initiatives vis-à-vis ratings agen
- Page 46 and 47: 44 After the crisis: A new socio-ec
- Page 48 and 49: Even if membership in a monetary un
- Page 50 and 51: emained relatively contained to spe
- Page 52 and 53: The second channel of functional sp
- Page 54 and 55: But even so, the depth and intensit
- Page 56 and 57: governance in the EU and the euro a
- Page 58 and 59: in the EU show, authorities at the
- Page 60 and 61: factors will remain prevalent and b
- Page 62 and 63: centralised decision-maker. Similar
- Page 66 and 67: (GNI), the interests of the member
- Page 68 and 69: terms only very slowly and as a per
- Page 70 and 71: policy proposal asks itself what th
- Page 72 and 73: ensure that a ceiling is put on the
- Page 74 and 75: Reform of EU expenditure Spending 4
- Page 76 and 77: The medium-term financial framework
- Page 78 and 79: unanimity. The need to obtain the c
- Page 80 and 81: therefore, was weakening the Europe
- Page 82 and 83: for the signing of the strict and d
- Page 84 and 85: Since then, member states have name
- Page 86 and 87: in the world monetary system. It al
- Page 88 and 89: a Treaty that not only ignores trad
- Page 90 and 91: 88 After the crisis: A new socio-ec
- Page 92 and 93: Firstly, they should include policy
- Page 94 and 95: emanate from demographic trends. Ho
- Page 96 and 97: Furthermore, the Lisbon agenda may
- Page 98 and 99: Strengthening, if not really crafti
- Page 100 and 101: incentives in the welfare schemes a
- Page 102 and 103: security, yet at a lower cost than
- Page 104 and 105: 102 After the crisis: A new socio-e
- Page 106 and 107: asis only in the 1990s, and over th
- Page 108 and 109: in an increasingly global age the
- Page 110 and 111: So what kind of social role for the
- Page 112 and 113: effective common policies in areas
Chapter 4<br />
<strong>The</strong> EU budget:<br />
“not fit for purpose”<br />
but change is afoot,<br />
gradually<br />
Alan Mayhew<br />
<strong>The</strong> European Union budget is “not fit for purpose” in the global age. Its<br />
critics are numerous, from the European Parliament, across government<br />
and amongst economists, lawyers and political scientists. <strong>The</strong> criticisms<br />
are clear: First, instead of supporting new policies tackling future<br />
challenges, the budget supports a low productivity sector, agriculture, and<br />
relatively poor regions in rich countries; Second, large budget rebates to<br />
relatively rich countries, together with side payments, agreed to obtain<br />
unanimity in the Council, severely limit transparency and equity in the<br />
budget; Third, policymaking in the Union is plagued by the net budget<br />
balance concerns of member states; Fourth, the Union’s own resources<br />
are in fact transfers from the member states, which divorce the budgetary<br />
authority from the taxpayers, and which, in the electoral process, therefore<br />
divorce European parliamentarians from responsibility for expenditure;<br />
Finally, the medium-term financial framework of the Union is not subject<br />
to influence from the European Parliament and severely limits flexibility<br />
in the budget to tackle rapidly changing policy requirements.<br />
Identifying these problems is naturally far easier than curing them. <strong>The</strong><br />
great difficulty is the need for unanimity amongst the 27 member states to<br />
make serious changes to the annual budget and the financial framework.<br />
While the overall budget is less than 1% of EU Gross National Income<br />
Chapter 4 – Alan Mayhew 63