14.11.2014 Views

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Putting a European “stamp” on the<br />

new global financial architecture<br />

Fourth, the current global reform agenda to reshape the regulatory<br />

architecture of the world economy can only be effectively influenced by<br />

the Europeans if they speak with a stronger voice, that is, with a single<br />

voice. At a moment when the institutions of global economic governance<br />

are being redesigned to take into account the rebalancing of the world<br />

economy in favour of emerging markets, a cacophony from the European<br />

side in discussions would condemn the EU to a spectator role that is not<br />

commensurate with its economic weight, its political clout and the intrinsic<br />

interests not just of the EU as a political entity, but of each of the Member<br />

States individually. <strong>The</strong> G20 process launched by the Washington Summit<br />

in November 2008 laid out a broad reform agenda, EU countries – and<br />

particularly the euro area countries – now need to agree on a common<br />

position to make sure this G20 negotiations stay on track and progress in<br />

line with their preferences.<br />

“More Europe” is here to stay<br />

It is apparent that “more Europe” is the likely answer to the current<br />

economic and financial crisis. And this answer can be expected to involve<br />

– and indeed necessitate – structural institutional change. Of course,<br />

whether or not the new quality of integration outcomes in Europe will<br />

have a distinctly intergovernmental feel to it – i.e. a continuous and<br />

dominant involvement of national authorities – or increasingly follow, in<br />

the long run, the supranational route – with stronger central institutions<br />

and majoritarian decision-making, remains to be seen. On this, the jury<br />

is out. But whatever the outcome, the future is “more Europe”, not “less<br />

Europe”.<br />

Chapter 3 – <strong>Gabriel</strong> Glöckler 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!