14.11.2014 Views

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

financial market rules. <strong>The</strong> ESFS authority over the European financial<br />

system would guard against the inadequacies or “capture” of national<br />

regulators. Most importantly, it would ensure the sufficient scale of<br />

operation necessary to prevent or effectively confront cross-border<br />

European-level systemic banking crises.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ESFS should be modeled as a single, integrated, cross-sectoral<br />

financial market supervisory institution, comprising banking, insurance<br />

and securities market supervision under one roof. Integrated financial<br />

supervision also makes sense in view of the process towards creating a<br />

pan-European capital markets infrastructure, with consolidated stock<br />

exchanges, clearance and settlements systems, and so on. Given the<br />

desirability of incorporating supervision of the city under a European<br />

supervisory scheme, the ESFS has the advantage of being able to play this<br />

role better than the ECB, for as long as the UK remains outside the<br />

Eurozone.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are some good reasons for assigning financial supervision to an<br />

institution separate from the ECB. According to a familiar argument, a<br />

conflict of interest may exist between financial supervision and central<br />

banking, in that a central bank may be tempted to loosen its monetary<br />

policy in order to bolster the banking system. It is also important that each<br />

institution retains a clear and unambiguous mandate that won’t lead to<br />

conflicting objectives or create risks that might undermine credibility in<br />

one area as a result of promoting the other. <strong>The</strong> information acquired by<br />

a central bank’s participation in the money market and foreign exchange<br />

dealings can be shared with the financial supervisor, in a structure of close<br />

interaction between the two and the financial industry, without the central<br />

bank having to perform a supervisory function. And successful rescue<br />

operations can be performed with the ECB in a central role (coordinating<br />

private creditors and public funds) without necessitating a joint supervisory<br />

function, which can be carried out by a distinct institution. Finally, a clear<br />

division of labour between the ESCB and the ESFS would help ensure a<br />

coherent communication strategy, an institution speaking with one single<br />

voice to the markets (“one voice policy”), avoiding conflicting messages<br />

and mixed signals emitted in situations of crisis. 17<br />

As the ESFS solution leaves local supervision to national authorities, some<br />

have criticised it as an inadequate substitute to a fully-fledged central<br />

super-regulator. However, complete regulatory centralisation is not<br />

politically feasible; and probably not even desirable either. <strong>The</strong> ESFS as a<br />

structure has the potential to lead to deeper integration. By ironing out<br />

38<br />

After the crisis: A new socio-economic settlement for the EU

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!