14.11.2014 Views

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In an interdependent European banking system, national-level responses<br />

exercise beggar-thy-neighbor effects on neighboring EU banking systems.<br />

Such was the case in October 2008, when countries like Ireland and<br />

subsequently Greece initially announced unlimited blanket guarantees<br />

for all bank deposits, opening opportunities for regulatory arbitrage at the<br />

expense of neighboring banking systems. <strong>The</strong> rapid spread of financial<br />

contagion from the US to Europe and the world points to the highly<br />

destabilising effects that financial integration and globalisation can have<br />

when not followed by corresponding governance structures.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pitfalls of regulatory fragmentation<br />

In the run-up to the crisis, European markets faced and continue to face a<br />

diversity of different rules and supervisory practices. <strong>The</strong> level playing<br />

field is not level at all, thus encouraging regulatory arbitrage. <strong>The</strong> issue of<br />

integrated banking supervision remains unresolved and has been stalled<br />

by cross-national differences.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fragmentation of the EU regime of financial regulation and supervision,<br />

which is testament to the cross-national heterogeneity of political and<br />

regulatory preferences, suffers from undeniable weaknesses. Information<br />

regarding the risk situation of a financial group is not effectively shared<br />

among different supervisors. As a result, financial contagion becomes<br />

more likely and disruptions emerging in one market can potentially spill<br />

over into other markets.<br />

<strong>The</strong> current system is not effective, and it is not efficient either. As pointed<br />

out by Deutsche Bank Research, 10 supervisory fragmentation creates<br />

duplication in reporting duties and inconsistent requirements for pan-<br />

European financial institutions. Rather than being rewarded for advancing<br />

the single market, pan-European banks end up carrying additional<br />

burdens. From the standpoint of the European financial market, this is<br />

counterproductive as it hinders the global competitiveness of Europe’s<br />

large financial services companies as well as Europe’s financial markets. 11<br />

Supervisory fragmentation is a problem not only in the cross-national but<br />

in the cross-sectoral dimension too. Market integration has blurred the<br />

borders between different financial market segments and activities. Many<br />

of the largest market players in Europe are financial conglomerates. <strong>The</strong><br />

recent crisis demonstrated the ease with which cross-border risks<br />

accumulated by investment banks can spread to commercial banks,<br />

Chapter 2 – George Pagoulatos 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!