14.11.2014 Views

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

Authors Iain Begg | Gabriel Glöckler | Anke Hassel ... - The Europaeum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in an increasingly global age the “subsidiarity test” cannot be just a choice<br />

between national and EU level, but rather between national, European<br />

and global action.<br />

<strong>The</strong> third obstacle and perhaps the most important in the long run, is the<br />

giant leap from 15 to 27 member states. <strong>The</strong> current crisis shows that the<br />

impact of enlargement on the prospects of European integration, and on<br />

Social Europe specifically, has been seriously underplayed. If today’s 27<br />

member states had to start from scratch they would never reach the level<br />

of consensus and policy development of the social acquis: the crisis comes<br />

as a reminder of the striking resilience and achievements of European<br />

integration and welfare regimes, but also of the deep cleavage in political<br />

views, and of the radically different starting points and performance of EU<br />

economies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> real significance of the German Court ruling on the Lisbon Treaty is not<br />

legal but political: it signals the extent to which the biggest EU country is<br />

now as assertive of its national interests as any other. As I write this paper,<br />

amid increasing signs that the Eurozone is slowly sailing towards lukewarm<br />

recovery rather than great depression, some EU economies are thrilled by<br />

an earlier-than-expected return to growth, just as others suffer a crippling<br />

20% contraction of their GDP. Some countries struggle to keep their<br />

unemployment rates below 5%, others would be very happy to have rates of<br />

three times this figure. From the employment rate of women and older<br />

workers to school drop-outs, one would struggle to find a relevant social<br />

indicator that doesn’t vary radically from country to country. Ignoring the<br />

impact of this diversity was probably politically necessary when doubts<br />

about the trade-off between EU widening and deepening would have been<br />

interpreted as unsubtle obstruction against enlargement; but today it would<br />

be disingenuous to assume that EU policies can be deepened no matter how<br />

many members join the club, or how diverse they are.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need for Social Europe today<br />

Looking at all these obstacles and constraints, one could be forgiven for<br />

seeking refuge in the safety of declamatory statements on Social Europe,<br />

long on good intentions and short on operational content: as how can<br />

Europe speak with one voice in the midst of the deepest economic crisis<br />

since its inception, when its 27 national economies, social situations and<br />

political realities sing such different tunes?<br />

And yet, as it seeks an exit to the crisis, the EU must find a social role, and<br />

a stronger one than in the past.<br />

106<br />

After the crisis: A new socio-economic settlement for the EU

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!