14.11.2014 Views

IGIDR Annual Report 2009-2010 - Indira Gandhi Institute of ...

IGIDR Annual Report 2009-2010 - Indira Gandhi Institute of ...

IGIDR Annual Report 2009-2010 - Indira Gandhi Institute of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Research Activities<br />

Health. Survey. (RDHS). data. (1992,. 2000,. and.<br />

2005). and. find. that. progress. towards. increasing.<br />

the. share. <strong>of</strong>. assisted. deliveries. has. been. slow..<br />

There. has. been. no. significant. increase. in. the.<br />

proportion.<strong>of</strong>.women.seeking.antenatal.care..This.<br />

could. partially. explain. why. a. large. proportion.<br />

<strong>of</strong>. women. continue. to. deliver. at. home. without.<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional.assistance..Further,.women.who.gave.<br />

birth. in. the. five. years. preceding. the. 2000. RDHS.<br />

are. less. likely. to. deliver. in. a. health. facility. than.<br />

those. who. gave. birth. in. the. five. years. preceding.<br />

the. 1992. RDHS.. The. authors. do. not. find. such.<br />

a. result. for. the. year. 2005.. They. also. find. that.<br />

women. are. more. likely. to. deliver. at. home.<br />

with. pr<strong>of</strong>essional. assistance. in. 2000. and. 2005.<br />

compared.to.1992.<br />

S.. Chandrasekhar. and. A. Mukhopadhyay. in. their.<br />

paper. “Poverty. and. Well-being. in. Indian. Cities.<br />

during. the. Reforms. Era”. (Poverty & Public<br />

Policy, The Berkeley Electronic Press,.Vol..2:.Iss..<br />

2,. Article. 7,. <strong>2010</strong>). seek. to. understand. temporal.<br />

changes.in.poverty.and.well-being.in.Indian.cities.<br />

during.the.era.<strong>of</strong>.economic.reforms..The.evidence.<br />

on. improvements. in. well-being. is. mixed.. During.<br />

this. period,. there. was. an. increase. in. the. number.<br />

<strong>of</strong>.urban.poor..Using.two.nationally.representative.<br />

samples,. they. compare. the. joint. distribution. <strong>of</strong>.<br />

monthly. per. capita. expenditure. (a. private. good).<br />

and. access. to. drainage. (a. public. good). in. the.<br />

slums. and. non-slum. areas. <strong>of</strong>. Indian. cities. to.<br />

understand. changes. in. well-being.. A. comparison.<br />

at. two. points. in. time,. 1993. and. 2002,. suggests.<br />

that. the. share. <strong>of</strong>. slum. dwellers. in. the. urban. poor.<br />

has.declined..While.they.do.not.find.evidence.for.<br />

improvement. in. the. well-being. <strong>of</strong>. slum. dwellers.<br />

over. time,. they. do. find. that. non-slum. urban.<br />

dwellers. are. better. <strong>of</strong>f. in. 2002. as. compared. to.<br />

1993.<br />

In. recent. times,. much. has. been. made. <strong>of</strong>. a.<br />

“booming”. Bihar.. However,. using. disaggregated<br />

data. R.. Nagaraj. and. Andaleeb. Rahaman. in.<br />

their. commentary. piece. “Booming. Bihar:. Fact.<br />

or. Fiction?,”. (Economic and Political Weekly,.<br />

February. 20,. <strong>2010</strong>). show. that. the. growth.<br />

has. been. based. almost. entirely. on. the. public.<br />

works. program. which. boosted. state. output. in<br />

construction. during. the. boom. in. that. sector.<br />

from. 2004-05. to. 2006-07.. Despite. this,. value.<br />

added. in. construction. is. overestimated,. given. the.<br />

infirmities. in. estimation. methods.. Further,. there.<br />

has. been. no. measurable. multiplier. effect. <strong>of</strong>. this.<br />

infrastructural.investment.on.the.rest.<strong>of</strong>.the.Bihar.<br />

economy.<br />

In.the.book.chapter.titled.“Industrial.Performance.<br />

1991-08:. A. Review”. (forthcoming. edition.<br />

<strong>of</strong>. India Development <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2010</strong>,. Oxford.<br />

University. Press),. R.. Nagaraj. reviews. the.<br />

industrial. performance. in. terms. <strong>of</strong>. its. growth.<br />

in. output,. fixed. investment. and. employment,.<br />

in. order. to. assess. them. against. the. (i). record.<br />

<strong>of</strong>. the. 1980s,. and. (ii). the. expectations. (and.<br />

apprehensions). the. reforms. gave. rise. to. when.<br />

they.were.initiated.about.two.decades.ago..In.the.<br />

aggregate,.the.trend.growth.rate.after.the.reforms.<br />

was.roughly.the.same.as.it.was.in.the.1980s.<br />

In. the. paper. “Regional. Disparities. in.<br />

Manufacturing. Growth. in. India”. K.V..<br />

Ramaswamy. examines. the. issue. <strong>of</strong>. spatial.<br />

disparity. in. manufacturing. growth. in. India.<br />

in. recent. years.. He. focuses. attention. on. the.<br />

registered.manufacturing.sector.in.14.major.States.<br />

<strong>of</strong>.India..On.the.basis.<strong>of</strong>.this.study,.the.following.<br />

inferences. may. be. made.. First,. the. evidence.<br />

for. convergence. in. per. capita. State. Domestic.<br />

Product.(SDP).in.the.post.reform.period.is.found.<br />

to. be. very. weak.. Second,. the. comparison. <strong>of</strong>.<br />

estimates. <strong>of</strong>. convergence. coefficient. in. the. two.<br />

periods. suggested. that. the. convergence. tendency.<br />

has. actually. weakened. in. the. post-reform.<br />

period.. Third,. spatial. concentration. in. Indian.<br />

manufacturing. clearly. shows. an. increasing. trend.<br />

particularly. after. 1995-6.. On. this. basis. the. paper.<br />

6 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2009</strong>-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!