14.11.2014 Views

Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning

Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning

Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 Part I <strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Robot</strong> <strong>Positioning</strong><br />

V o<br />

I<br />

Magnetizing current<br />

Time<br />

Offset<br />

H y<br />

M<br />

Magnetization<br />

Time<br />

a. b.<br />

V<br />

Sensor signal<br />

Figure 2.26: External current pulses set <strong>and</strong> reset the direction of magnetization,<br />

resulting in the “flipped” response characteristics shown by the dashed line. Note<br />

the DC offset of the device remains constant, while the signal output is inverted.<br />

(Adapted from [Petersen, 1989].)<br />

Offset<br />

Time<br />

synchronous detector driven by the same square-wave source. The rectified DC voltages V H1 <strong>and</strong> VH2<br />

are thus proportional to the measured magnetic field components H 1 <strong>and</strong> H 2 . The applied field<br />

direction is dependant on the ratio of V to H, not their absolute values. This means that as long as the<br />

two channels are calibrated to the same sensitivity, no temperature correction is required [Fraden,<br />

1993].<br />

2.4.5 Magnetoelastic Compasses<br />

A number of researchers have recently investigated the use of magnetoelastic (also known as<br />

magnetostrictive) materials as sensing elements <strong>for</strong> high-resolution magnetometers. The principle of<br />

operation is based on the changes in Young’s modulus experienced by magnetic alloys when exposed<br />

to an external magnetic field. The modulus of elasticity E of a given material is basically a measure<br />

of its stiffness, <strong>and</strong> directly relates stress to strain as follows:<br />

E ' F ,<br />

(2.16)<br />

where<br />

E = Young’s modulus of elasticity<br />

F = applied stress<br />

, = resulting strain.<br />

Any ferromagnetic material will experience some finite amount of strain (expansion or shrinkage)<br />

in the direction of magnetization due to this magnetostriction phenomenon. It st<strong>and</strong>s to reason that<br />

if the applied stress F remains the same, strain , will vary inversely with any change in Young’s<br />

modulus E. In certain amorphous metallic alloys, this effect is very pronounced.<br />

Barrett et al. [1973] proposed a qualitative explanation, wherein individual atoms in the crystal<br />

lattice are treated as tiny magnetic dipoles. The <strong>for</strong>ces exerted by these dipoles on one another depend<br />

upon their mutual orientation within the lattice; if the dipoles are aligned end to end, the opposite

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!