Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pieces of the Puzzle<br />
Conclusion<br />
Mike Cougill<br />
1<br />
a bridge. But the basic scenery turned out well, and I’m<br />
happy with the results.<br />
I really went vertical with the trees though, some of<br />
them reaching 24” or more in height. We modelers seem<br />
to have a fear of modeling tall objects. I think many are<br />
worried that it’ll take away from the trains or look out of<br />
scale. That’s a legitimate concern, especially in O <strong>Scale</strong><br />
where things can get big. But when done thoughtfully, the<br />
results can be dramatic. Look at the difference the trees<br />
make between Photos 2-3. The trees now lend a sense of<br />
scale to the scene; and when you add a train, as in Photo<br />
4, you get the impression that the train now fits into the<br />
landscape instead of being separate from it. Our eyes are<br />
registering the different proportions of the elements in the<br />
scene and telling us whether things look right or not. I think<br />
one of the reasons O <strong>Scale</strong> models often look unrealistic is<br />
this lack of proportion with the scenery. There often aren’t<br />
any elements that dwarf the trains or buildings like a tall<br />
2<br />
In our last installment of the series, we’re going to look<br />
at how scenery can turn a plain shelf with some track on<br />
it into a believable slice of modeled reality. Some believe<br />
that a shelf layout is hard to scenic. While their flat nature<br />
can be hard to ignore or work around, with a little ingenuity<br />
and observation of the real world, a shelf-style layout<br />
can look very realistic.<br />
Puzzle Piece #7: Go Vertical.<br />
One mistake modelers often make in designing scenery<br />
for a shelf layout is not having enough vertical elements.<br />
The tendency is to keep things on just one level. This is<br />
an easy trap to fall into and I sort of did just that myself.<br />
By their nature shelf layouts too often look like what they<br />
are: a flat shelf. I tried to avoid this when I built the benchwork<br />
by raising the track up so that I could have terrain<br />
that dipped below track level, and have tracks at different<br />
elevations from the mainline (Photo 1). I wish, in hindsight,<br />
that I had emphasized this more than I did. I really didn’t<br />
plan for having scenery below the tracks like streams or<br />
rivers. The I & W must be one of the few layouts without<br />
July/Aug ’08 - O <strong>Scale</strong> <strong>Trains</strong> • 37