13.11.2014 Views

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F<br />

PORTLAND POSTER SESSION<br />

From the Ballot Ashes<br />

Rebirth of Interstate MAX<br />

LEAH ROBBINS<br />

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon<br />

or transit properties that have had success planning and building light rail projects, there is<br />

the potential to disconnect the critical link between community value and project planning,<br />

and yet expect continued success. However, the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District<br />

of Oregon (Tri-Met) managed to take a failing project from the dregs of a failed local (regional)<br />

funding election and in its place create a project of value to the community it serves and the local<br />

and federal funding partners.<br />

A review of the demise and resurgence of a light rail project is supported by interviews<br />

with key participants in planning, financing, communications, and engineering. Public transit<br />

projects must be good public policy as well. They must make technical sense, but more<br />

importantly have credibility with the community it serves and be fiscally responsible from<br />

inception to implementation.<br />

The Interstate Metropolitan Area Express succeeded by fostering and maintaining a<br />

collaborative team from design through construction; aligning and maintaining project priorities;<br />

and focusing on value for the public and the transit system.<br />

IN<strong>TR</strong>ODUCTION<br />

The Interstate Metropolitan Area Express (MAX) Project literally arose from the ashes of the<br />

South/North Project after its narrow defeat in the November 1998 regional funding election. The<br />

South/North Project was quite dead, technically and politically. Months later, however, a<br />

community based effort brought a new project proposal to light that held three priorities<br />

paramount: serve north and northeast Portland with reliable transit; build a quality project with<br />

lower costs than the South/North proposal; and require no displacements along the alignment.<br />

This paper attempts to detail the transition from what had been South/North Project to<br />

Interstate MAX from the perspectives of planning, engineering, financing, and communications<br />

staff involved with both projects. Interstate MAX construction is currently 75% complete<br />

overall—four months ahead of schedule and under budget. Service is scheduled to begin<br />

September 2004.<br />

But it didn’t start that way.<br />

South/North Project<br />

The South/North Transit Corridor was identified as the priority corridor for high capacity transit<br />

improvements through Metro’s Region 2040 Growth Concept. Planning began in 1993 and<br />

culminated in the Locally Preferred Strategy selection of a light rail project from the Clackamas<br />

Regional Center to Rose Quarter Transit Center.<br />

629

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!