13.11.2014 Views

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Carman, Smoluchowski, and Berliner 411<br />

FLOATING SLAB DESIGN ISSUES<br />

In basic terms, an FST system is comprised of springs and masses, which are designed to isolate<br />

vibration coming from wheel or rail interaction, and decrease its transmission to the surrounding<br />

track support structure. The amount of isolation necessary depends on the amount of vibration<br />

reduction required by the particular circumstances of each situation. The circumstances involve<br />

many factors, including<br />

• Sensitivity of the affected building,<br />

• Speed of the transit vehicles,<br />

• Rail roughness,<br />

• Dynamic interaction between the vehicle’s trucks and the rail system,<br />

• Response of the soil underlying the track,<br />

• Ease of propagation of vibration through the soil between the track and the building,<br />

• Response of the building to ground vibration, and<br />

• Manner in which vibration is transmitted through the building.<br />

The amount of vibration reduction that can be achieved using an FST depends on the<br />

dynamic characteristics of the transit vehicle, but is dictated to a large degree by the primary<br />

natural frequency of the FST system. The FST can be idealized as a simple spring-mass and<br />

damper system as depicted in Figure 3. In actuality, it is a more complex dynamic system than<br />

this, but for determining the basic performance of the FST it often suffices to model it in this<br />

manner. Field tests performed on a full scale FST mock-up (1) demonstrated this, in particular<br />

when the FST is under vehicle load.<br />

The FST system will have a natural frequency determined by the stiffness of the<br />

supporting springs and the amount of mass the springs support. Contrary to an occasionally<br />

expressed opinion, the mass of the transit vehicle does not affect the natural frequency of the<br />

M = ISOLATED MASS<br />

K = SUPPORT SPRING STIFFNESS<br />

C = DAMPING COEFFICIENT<br />

M<br />

f n =<br />

2 1 K<br />

M<br />

K<br />

C<br />

FIGURE 3 Idealized spring-mass and damper system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!