TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20 Transportation Research Circular E-C058: 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference TABLE 4 Stations, Double Tracking, Electrification & Signaling City/System Passenger Stations & Car Stops Double Track km mi Traction Power (vDC) Substations No. Rating (mW) Type of Overhead Block Signals Traffic Baltimore, Central Corridor 28 28.6 17.8 750 14+ 1 Catenary 91% 9% Boston, Green Line & Mattapan ~83 44.4 27.6 600 12 3-6 Trolley 62% 38% Buffalo, MetroRail 14 10.3 6.4 650 5 2 Catenary 81% 19% Cleveland, Blue/Green 33 21.1 13.1 600 6+ ? Catenary 84% 46% Dallas, DART LRT 34 32.2 20.0 750 ? ? Catenary ~80% ~20% Denver, RTD LRT 17 22.0 13.7 750 7 1 Both 60% 40% Jersey City & Newark, NJ Transit 29 23.8 14.8 750 4+ ? Both ? ? Los Angeles, Blue/Green/Gold 36 66.3 41.2 750 21 1.5-3.0 Both 86% 14% New Orleans, Streetcars 55 14.0 8.7 600 ? ? Trolley 0% 100% Philadelphia, City & Suburban 217 49.6 30.8 600/635 4+ ? Trolley 25% 75% Pittsburgh, South Hills 59 27.4 17.0 640 6 6 Both 90% 10% Portland, MAX 46 52.5 32.6 750 34 0.75 Both 52% 48% Portland, Streetcar 24 8.1 5.0 750 5 0.30 Trolley 0% 100% Sacramento, RT LRT 30 25.4 15.8 750 15 1 Both 77% 23% St Louis, MetroLink 18 26.5 16.5 750 12 1.5 Catenary 100% 0% Salt Lake City, UTA LRT 16 24.4 15.2 750 ? ? Both 77% 13% San Diego Trolley 48 72.0 44.7 600 33 1 Both 92% 8% San Francisco, Muni ~215 35.6 22.1 600 12 2-8 Trolley 19% 81% San Jose, VTA LRT 41 43.1 26.8 750 15+ 1.5 Both 58% 42% Seattle/Tacoma 5 0.8 0.5 750 2 ? Catenary ? 100% Total US 1020 628.1 390.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- Calgary, C-Train 31 29.3 18.2 600 17 2 Both 92% 8% Edmonton, LRT 10 12.3 7.6 600 8 2 Catenary 100% 0% Toronto, Streetcars ~625 75.5 46.9 600 ? ? Trolley 0% 100% Total Canada 666 117.1 72.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- Totals - US & Canada 1686 745.2 463.1 -- -- -- -- -- --
TABLE 5 Revenue Service Vehicles Characteristics of Most Common Vehicle City/System Car Types 1 Builders Fleet Accel Vmax Length Weight Train Capacity ATS No. m/s/s mphps km/h mph m ft tonnes tons # cars Baltimore, Central Corridor LRV-6-ADac ABB/Adtranz 53 1.3 3.0 88 55 29 95 50 55 3 84/174 No Boston, Green Line & Mattapan LRV-6-ADac Boeing, Kinki, Breda 2 215 1.3 3.0 80 50 22 72 38 42 3 50/130 No Buffalo, MetroRail LRV-4-RDac Tokyu 27 1.3 3.0 80 50 20 67 17 19 3 51/121 Yes Cleveland, Blue/Green LRV-6-ADac Breda 48 1.3 3.0 88 55 24 80 40 45 2 80/144 Part Dallas, DART LRT LRV-6-ADac Kinki 95 1.3 3.0 105 65 28 93 50 55 3 76/160 ? Denver, RTD LRT LRV-6-ADac Siemens 31 1.3 3.0 88 55 24 80 37 41 3 64/144 No Jersey City & Newark, NJ Transit LRV-6-ADac Kinki 45 1.3 3.0 80 50 27 90 45 49 2 68/160 ? Los Angeles, Blue/Green/Gold LRV-6-ADac Siemens & Nippon 121 1.3 3.0 88 55 27 89 43 47 3 76/160 Yes New Orleans, Streetcars VTL-4-RD Perley Thomas 41 0.8 1.7 43 27 14 48 19 21 1 52/68 No Philadelphia, City & Suburban LRV-4-RS/Dac Kawasaki 141 1.3 3.0 80 50 15/16 50/53 27 30 1 50/95 No Pittsburgh, South Hills LRV-6-ADac Siemens 55 1.3 3.0 80 50 26 84 36 40 2 62/150 Yes Portland, MAX LRV-6-ADac Siemens & Bombardier 78 1.3 3.0 88 55 27/28 89/92 42/50 46/55 2 64-76/170 Yes Portland, Streetcar LRV-4-ADac Inekon-Skoda 7 1.5 3.4 70 43 20 66 29 32 1 30/90 No Sacramento, RT LRT LRV-6-ADac Siemens 56 1.1 2.5 80 50 24 80 36 40 4 60/144 No St Louis, MetroLink LRV-6-ADac Siemens 65 1.3 3.0 88 55 26 86 41 45 2 72/155 Yes-Cab Salt Lake City, UTA LRT LRV-6-ADac Siemens 33 1.3 3.0 88 55 24 80 37 41 4 64/144 No San Diego Trolley LRV-6-ADac Siemens 123 1.3 3.0 88 55 24 80 37 41 4 64/144 No San Francisco, Muni LRV-6-ADac Breda 175 1.3 3.0 84 52 23 75 30 33 3 60/130 Part-Cab San Jose, VTA LRT LRV-6-ADac Kinki & UTDC 50 1.3 3.0 88 55 27/28 89/92 45 49 2 75/160 No Seattle/Tacoma LRV-4-Adac Inekon-Skoda 3 1.5 3.4 70 43 20 66 29 32 1 30/90 ? Total US 1462 Calgary, C-Train LRV-6-AD Siemens 99 1.0 2.2 80 50 24 80 32 35 3 64/162 Yes Edmonton, LRT LRV-6-AD Siemens 37 1.0 2.2 80 50 24 80 40 45 5 64/162 Yes Toronto, Streetcars LRV-4/6-R/AS UTDC 248 1.3 3.0 85 53 16/23 53/75 23/37 26/40 1 46/95 No Total Canada 384 Totals - US & Canada 1846 1-LRV=light rail vehicle, VTL=vintag trolley, #=no. of axles, A/R=articulated or rigid, D/S=double or single ended & sided, ac=air conditioned. 2-Boston total includes 11 PCC-4-RS.
Page 1 and 2: 9 th National Light Rail Transit Co
Page 3 and 4: E Foreword xperience, Economics and
Page 5 and 6: Contents OPENING GENERAL SESSION St
Page 7 and 8: Shared-Use Corridors: A Survey of C
Page 9: LIGHT RAIL ELECTRIFICATION Feederle
Page 13 and 14: T OPENING GENERAL SESSION Status of
Page 15 and 16: Schumann and Loetterle 5 SEATTLE/TA
Page 17 and 18: Schumann and Loetterle 7 Current Co
Page 19 and 20: Schumann and Loetterle 9 Current Co
Page 21 and 22: Schumann and Loetterle 11 Current C
Page 23 and 24: Schumann and Loetterle 13 In early
Page 25 and 26: Schumann and Loetterle 15 CALGARY F
Page 27 and 28: Schumann and Loetterle 17 9. http:/
Page 29: TABLE 3 Right of Way Locations km o
Page 33 and 34: PLANNING AND FORECASTING FOR LIGHT
Page 35 and 36: Thompson 27 These ideas appealed to
Page 37 and 38: Thompson 29 beginning, however, tha
Page 39 and 40: Thompson 31 in the interviews becau
Page 41 and 42: Thompson 33 San Diego San Diego was
Page 43 and 44: Thompson 35 to the National Confere
Page 45 and 46: S PLANNING AND FORECASTING FOR LIGH
Page 47 and 48: Day and Stauder 39 Pre-1996 Transpo
Page 49 and 50: Day and Stauder 41 part of the gene
Page 51 and 52: Day and Stauder 43 Comparability Ac
Page 53 and 54: Kaplan, Englisher, and Warner 45 PR
Page 55 and 56: Washington Park Fairview Heights Me
Page 57 and 58: FIGURE 3 TAZ splits in St. Clair Co
Page 59 and 60: Kaplan, Englisher, and Warner 51 lo
Page 61 and 62: Kaplan, Englisher, and Warner 53 to
Page 63 and 64: Kaplan, Englisher, and Warner 55 No
Page 65 and 66: Kaplan, Englisher, and Warner 57 Co
Page 67 and 68: Straus and Watry 59 then, Muni has
Page 69 and 70: Straus and Watry 61 Various factors
Page 71 and 72: Straus and Watry 63 Francisco Count
Page 73 and 74: Straus and Watry 65 where it would
Page 75 and 76: Straus and Watry 67 require lifting
Page 77 and 78: Straus and Watry 69 TABLE 2 In-Vehi
Page 79 and 80: Straus and Watry 71 FIGURE 5 Bay Vi
Page 81 and 82:
Straus and Watry 73 LESSONS LEARNED
Page 83 and 84:
Marchwinski, Spitz, and Adler 75 BA
Page 85 and 86:
Marchwinski, Spitz, and Adler 77 re
Page 87 and 88:
Marchwinski, Spitz, and Adler 79 QU
Page 89 and 90:
Marchwinski, Spitz, and Adler 81 St
Page 91 and 92:
Marchwinski, Spitz, and Adler 83 TA
Page 93 and 94:
Marchwinski, Spitz, and Adler 85 It
Page 96 and 97:
LOW-FLOOR LIGHT RAIL VEHICLES Struc
Page 98 and 99:
Sarunac and Zeolla 91 STRUCTURAL ST
Page 100 and 101:
Sarunac and Zeolla 93 LRV-LFE DESIG
Page 102 and 103:
Sarunac and Zeolla 95 The values no
Page 104 and 105:
Sarunac and Zeolla 97 to evaluate a
Page 106 and 107:
Sarunac and Zeolla 99 TABLE 1 Summa
Page 108 and 109:
Sarunac and Zeolla 101 Comparison o
Page 110 and 111:
Sarunac and Zeolla 103 approach, ap
Page 112 and 113:
Morgan 105 concept can be readily i
Page 114 and 115:
Morgan 107 DART LRVs are all relati
Page 116 and 117:
Morgan 109 trailer truck with 4-dis
Page 118 and 119:
Morgan 111 Conclusion Because of th
Page 120 and 121:
Morgan 113 TABLE 1 Comparison of Se
Page 122 and 123:
Morgan 115 After the real estate, t
Page 124 and 125:
Morgan 117 Fleet Maintenance Standa
Page 126 and 127:
LOW-FLOOR LIGHT RAIL VEHICLES Integ
Page 128 and 129:
Fraser, Leary, Marianeschi, and Pel
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138:
Page 142 and 143:
D LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND OTHER MODE
Page 144 and 145:
McBrayer 137 As of September 2002,
Page 146 and 147:
McBrayer 139 Understandable Route T
Page 148 and 149:
McBrayer 141 and reward investment
Page 150 and 151:
McBrayer 143 The results of this ap
Page 152 and 153:
McBrayer 145 of transit improvement
Page 154:
McBrayer 147 system, the use of ali
Page 158 and 159:
A LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT TRAFFIC ENGINE
Page 160 and 161:
Boorse 153 use could be problematic
Page 162 and 163:
Boorse 155 Section 10C.10—Do Not
Page 164 and 165:
Boorse 157 purpose. In fact, to the
Page 166 and 167:
Boorse 159 (a) (b) FIGURE 3 Figures
Page 168 and 169:
Boorse 161 Section 10D.05—Traffic
Page 170 and 171:
Boorse 163 (a) (b) FIGURE 4 Example
Page 172 and 173:
Boorse 165 practices. This resulted
Page 174 and 175:
Black 167 FIGURE 1 Hudson-Bergen LR
Page 176 and 177:
Black 169 Return Phases may also be
Page 178 and 179:
Black 171 FIGURE 5 Naztec preemptio
Page 180 and 181:
Black 173 FIGURE 8 Split times cann
Page 182 and 183:
Koonce, Urbanik, and Mishra 175 inh
Page 184 and 185:
Koonce, Urbanik, and Mishra 177 EXI
Page 186 and 187:
Koonce, Urbanik, and Mishra 179 TAB
Page 188 and 189:
Koonce, Urbanik, and Mishra 181 FIG
Page 190 and 191:
Koonce, Urbanik, and Mishra 183 (a)
Page 192:
Koonce, Urbanik, and Mishra 185 CON
Page 196 and 197:
O LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND TRANSIT-OR
Page 198 and 199:
Arrington 191 FIGURE 2 Eastside Vil
Page 200 and 201:
Arrington 193 restricted to propert
Page 202 and 203:
Arrington 195 Portland’s Westside
Page 204 and 205:
Arrington 197 FIGURE 4 Orenco Stati
Page 206 and 207:
Arrington 199 FIGURE 5 America Plaz
Page 208 and 209:
Arrington 201 with 2,600 units. Und
Page 210 and 211:
Arrington 203 TABLE 2 Ten Steps to
Page 212 and 213:
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND TRANSIT-ORIE
Page 214 and 215:
Fitzsimmons and Birch 207 FIGURE 1
Page 216 and 217:
Fitzsimmons and Birch 209 pockets o
Page 218 and 219:
Fitzsimmons and Birch 211 The Futur
Page 220 and 221:
Fitzsimmons and Birch 213 The state
Page 222 and 223:
M LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND TRANSIT-OR
Page 224 and 225:
H UNTERSPOINTSHIPYARD Beatty 217 H
Page 226 and 227:
HUNTERS POINT EXPWY Beatty 219 WILL
Page 228 and 229:
Beatty 221 an attractive alternativ
Page 230 and 231:
Beatty 223 Bayshore Boulevard at Su
Page 232 and 233:
Beatty 225 secondary bus type. The
Page 234 and 235:
Beatty 227 SUNNYDALE AVENUE Platfor
Page 236 and 237:
Beatty 229 SUNNYDALE AVENUE 18' 12'
Page 238 and 239:
Beatty 231 The Southern Terminal is
Page 240 and 241:
Edwards and Phillips 233 means for
Page 242 and 243:
Edwards and Phillips 235 Road corri
Page 244 and 245:
Edwards and Phillips 237 viable nei
Page 246 and 247:
Edwards and Phillips 239 recreation
Page 248 and 249:
Edwards and Phillips 241 bridge). T
Page 250 and 251:
Edwards and Phillips 243 Additional
Page 252 and 253:
Edwards and Phillips 245 • Serve
Page 254 and 255:
Edwards and Phillips 247 • Ensure
Page 256 and 257:
CROSSINGS AND SHARED CORRIDORS “L
Page 258 and 259:
Ames and Gamlen 253
Page 260 and 261:
TABLE 1 Third Street LRT Project Ra
Page 262 and 263:
Ames and Gamlen 257 Condition Freig
Page 264 and 265:
Ames and Gamlen 259 TABLE 2 Third S
Page 266 and 267:
Ames and Gamlen 261 where the light
Page 268 and 269:
Ames and Gamlen 263 Table 4 shows t
Page 270 and 271:
Ames and Gamlen 265 CONCLUSION Impl
Page 272 and 273:
Irwin 267 recommendations. TriMet
Page 274 and 275:
Irwin 269 TRIMET STANDARDS TriMet h
Page 276 and 277:
Irwin 271 FIGURE 2 Pedestrian warni
Page 278 and 279:
Irwin 273 Channeling Figure 4 detai
Page 280 and 281:
Irwin 275 FIGURE 5 Typical crossing
Page 282 and 283:
Irwin 277 The disadvantages of swin
Page 284 and 285:
Irwin 279 FIGURE 8 Standard detail
Page 286 and 287:
Irwin 281 FIGURE 9 Audible or visua
Page 288 and 289:
Irwin 283 . FIGURE 10 Audible or vi
Page 290 and 291:
Irwin 285 In general, ODOT Rail dis
Page 292 and 293:
Irwin 287 FIGURE 12 Pedestrian sigh
Page 294 and 295:
CROSSINGS AND SHARED CORRIDORS Reso
Page 296 and 297:
Ryan, Rabiner, and Trumbull 291 The
Page 298 and 299:
Ryan, Rabiner, and Trumbull 293 FIG
Page 300 and 301:
Ryan, Rabiner, and Trumbull 295 The
Page 302 and 303:
Ryan, Rabiner, and Trumbull 297 FIG
Page 304 and 305:
Ryan, Rabiner, and Trumbull 299 REF
Page 306 and 307:
Sela, Resor, and Hickey 301 opportu
Page 308 and 309:
Sela, Resor, and Hickey 303 TABLE 1
Page 310 and 311:
City Atlanta Baltimore Operating Ag
Page 312 and 313:
TABLE 2 (continued) Transit Systems
Page 314 and 315:
Sela, Resor, and Hickey 309 Time Se
Page 316 and 317:
Sela, Resor, and Hickey 311 Grade C
Page 318 and 319:
Sela, Resor, and Hickey 313 records
Page 320 and 321:
Sela, Resor, and Hickey 315 recomme
Page 323 and 324:
CRITIQUES: HOW ARE WE DOING? Riders
Page 325 and 326:
Polzin and Page 321 NTD ID TABLE 1
Page 327 and 328:
Polzin and Page 323 35 30 Ridership
Page 329 and 330:
Polzin and Page 325 As an indicatio
Page 331 and 332:
D allas TX Denver CO 100 100 80 80
Page 333 and 334:
Polzin and Page 329 Passengers per
Page 335 and 336:
Polzin and Page 331 TABLE 3 Percent
Page 337 and 338:
Polzin and Page 333 Figure 10 graph
Page 339 and 340:
Polzin and Page 335 3500 Passenger
Page 341 and 342:
Polzin and Page 337 productivity tr
Page 343 and 344:
Cooper and Furmaniak 339 PROJECT OV
Page 345 and 346:
Cooper and Furmaniak 341 less than
Page 347 and 348:
Cooper and Furmaniak 343 substation
Page 349 and 350:
Cooper and Furmaniak 345 120,000 10
Page 351 and 352:
Cooper and Furmaniak 347 failures,
Page 353 and 354:
Cooper and Furmaniak 349 creatively
Page 355 and 356:
D CRITIQUES: HOW ARE WE DOING? Peak
Page 357 and 358:
Demery and Higgins 353 The finding
Page 359 and 360:
Demery and Higgins 355 TABLE 1 Regr
Page 361 and 362:
Demery and Higgins 357 TABLE 3 Regr
Page 363 and 364:
Demery and Higgins 359 have to be s
Page 365 and 366:
Demery and Higgins 361 regularly ex
Page 367 and 368:
Demery and Higgins 363 passengers (
Page 369 and 370:
Demery and Higgins 365 92-ft (28-m)
Page 371 and 372:
Demery and Higgins 367 NOTES 1. The
Page 373 and 374:
Demery and Higgins 369 18. Moore, J
Page 375 and 376:
M CRITIQUES: HOW ARE WE DOING? Ligh
Page 377 and 378:
Henry 373 SUCCESS MEANS FAILURE? De
Page 379 and 380:
Henry 375 trolley car” for their
Page 381 and 382:
Henry 377 Cox’s claims appear to
Page 383 and 384:
Henry 379 ATTACK ON SMART GROWTH AN
Page 385 and 386:
Henry 381 But another question is r
Page 387 and 388:
Henry 383 FIGURE 1 Average proporti
Page 389:
Henry 385 REFERENCES 1. Layton, Lyn
Page 393 and 394:
CIVIL DESIGN Design and Constructio
Page 395 and 396:
Berliner, Campo, Dickerson, and Mac
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
CIVIL DESIGN Floating Slab Trackbed
Page 413 and 414:
Carman, Smoluchowski, and Berliner
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
FIGURE 5 Plan view of NERL MOS-1 FS
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
CIVIL DESIGN Fitting Light Rail Tra
Page 427 and 428:
Emili, Spadaccino, Risoldi, Tuzi, a
Page 429 and 430:
FIGURE 3 Aerial view of the constru
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
FIGURE 6 Piazza Vittorio Emanuele u
Page 435 and 436:
FIGURE 8 Vibration measurement resu
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
FIGURE 11 Side and central precast
Page 441 and 442:
T CIVIL DESIGN Embedded Track Desig
Page 443 and 444:
FIGURE 1 Configuration 1: Rail full
Page 445 and 446:
Daniels 441 Configuration 2: Rail o
Page 447 and 448:
FIGURE 4 Idealizations for modeling
Page 449 and 450:
Daniels 445 Results Available from
Page 451 and 452:
Note: Fatigue life is calculated on
Page 453 and 454:
35 Note: Fatigue life is calculated
Page 455 and 456:
Daniels 451 Pressures: Rail Support
Page 457 and 458:
12 10 Slab Pressure on Ground Suppo
Page 459 and 460:
RAIL UPLIFT FORCE FROM THERMAL EFFE
Page 461 and 462:
Daniels 457 SUMMARY Analysis of emb
Page 463 and 464:
T CIVIL DESIGN Debate of At-Grade V
Page 465 and 466:
Li and Tertadian 461 \ FIGURE 1 Exp
Page 467 and 468:
Li and Tertadian 463 FIGURE 2 Exist
Page 469 and 470:
Li and Tertadian 465 navigability.
Page 471 and 472:
Li and Tertadian 467 being consider
Page 473:
Li and Tertadian 469 TABLE 1 Estima
Page 476 and 477:
474 Transportation Research Circula
Page 478 and 479:
Page 480 and 481:
Page 482 and 483:
Page 484 and 485:
Page 486 and 487:
Page 488 and 489:
Page 490 and 491:
Page 492 and 493:
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500 and 501:
Page 502 and 503:
Page 504 and 505:
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
Page 510 and 511:
Page 512 and 513:
Page 514 and 515:
Page 516 and 517:
OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS From
Page 518 and 519:
Swiecick, Van Dyke, and O’Connor
Page 520 and 521:
Page 522 and 523:
Page 524 and 525:
Page 526 and 527:
Page 528 and 529:
Page 530 and 531:
P OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Imp
Page 532 and 533:
Page 534 and 535:
Page 536:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Page 539 and 540:
Page 541 and 542:
Page 543 and 544:
Page 545 and 546:
Page 547 and 548:
Page 549 and 550:
Page 551 and 552:
Page 553 and 554:
Page 555 and 556:
Page 557 and 558:
Page 559 and 560:
Page 561 and 562:
Page 563 and 564:
Page 565 and 566:
Page 567 and 568:
Page 569 and 570:
Page 571 and 572:
Page 573 and 574:
Page 575 and 576:
Page 577 and 578:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT Design-Build Con
Page 579 and 580:
Page 581 and 582:
Page 584:
PORTLAND POSTER SESSION
Page 587 and 588:
Page 589 and 590:
Page 591 and 592:
Page 593 and 594:
Page 595 and 596:
Page 597 and 598:
Page 599 and 600:
Page 601 and 602:
Page 603 and 604:
T PORTLAND POSTER SESSION Special P
Page 605 and 606:
Page 607 and 608:
Page 609 and 610:
Page 611 and 612:
Page 613 and 614:
Page 615 and 616:
Page 617 and 618:
Page 619 and 620:
Page 621 and 622:
Page 623 and 624:
Page 625 and 626:
Page 627 and 628:
Page 629 and 630:
Page 631 and 632:
Page 633 and 634:
Page 635 and 636:
Page 638:
LIGHT RAIL ELECTRIFICATION
Page 641 and 642:
Page 643 and 644:
Page 645 and 646:
Page 647 and 648:
Page 649 and 650:
Page 651 and 652:
LIGHT RAIL ELECTRIFICATION Operatio
Page 653 and 654:
Page 655 and 656:
Page 657 and 658:
Page 659 and 660:
Page 661 and 662:
Page 663 and 664:
Page 665 and 666:
Page 667 and 668:
Page 669 and 670:
Page 671 and 672:
Page 673 and 674:
Page 675 and 676:
Page 677 and 678:
Page 679 and 680:
L LIGHT RAIL ELECTRIFICATION Built-
Page 681 and 682:
Page 683 and 684:
Page 685 and 686:
Page 687 and 688:
Page 689 and 690:
Page 691 and 692:
Page 693 and 694:
Page 695 and 696:
Page 697 and 698:
T LIGHT RAIL ELECTRIFICATION One Br
Page 699 and 700:
FIGURE 1 Light rail in Portland.
Page 701 and 702:
Page 703 and 704:
Page 705 and 706:
Page 707 and 708:
FIGURE 2 Voltage profile.
Page 709 and 710:
Page 711 and 712:
Page 713 and 714:
Page 715 and 716:
Page 717 and 718:
Page 719 and 720:
Page 721 and 722:
Page 723 and 724:
Page 725 and 726:
Page 727 and 728:
Page 729 and 730:
Page 731 and 732:
Page 733 and 734:
Page 735 and 736:
Page 737 and 738:
Page 739 and 740:
Page 741 and 742:
Page 743 and 744:
Page 745 and 746:
Page 747 and 748:
Page 749 and 750:
Page 751 and 752:
Page 753 and 754:
Page 755 and 756:
Page 757 and 758:
Page 759 and 760:
Page 761 and 762:
Page 763 and 764:
Page 765 and 766:
Page 767 and 768:
Page 769 and 770:
Page 771 and 772:
Page 773 and 774:
Page 775 and 776:
Page 777 and 778:
Page 779 and 780:
Page 781 and 782:
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2003
Page 783 and 784:
Officers George F. Dixon, III, Chai
Page 785:
APTA Officers and Board of Director
Page 788 and 789:
The National Academy of Sciences is
show all

TR Circular E-C058_9th LRT Conference_2003.pdf - Florida ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?