13.11.2014 Views

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />

Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the 2001 alerts<br />

A breakdown <strong>of</strong> the 207 alerts issued last year show that 21 media practitioners<br />

were attacked or beaten, four were bombed or suffered damage through<br />

arson, 52 were detained, nine were charged, 30 were threatened, seven were<br />

expelled, 39 incidences <strong>of</strong> censorship were reported, 20 cases <strong>of</strong> legal action<br />

were recorded - where journalists faced legal action or where legislation was<br />

passed that affected the media, 11 victories were recorded and a further 14<br />

incidents were reported that proved a violation <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> expression that<br />

did not necessarily affect the media.<br />

Trends detected during 2001<br />

Although these alerts, as they are generally referred to, provide some indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> press freedom in various countries, they do not necessarily<br />

provide an accurate reading <strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> press freedom in each country.<br />

Weak media monitoring activities in some countries, such as Lesotho, South<br />

<strong>Africa</strong> and Angola, do not reflect the frequent press freedom violations which<br />

occur in them.<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

The high statistics for Zimbabwe, in turn, are both indicative <strong>of</strong> the consistent<br />

monitoring carried out by the Zimbabwean chapter <strong>of</strong> MISA (MISA-Zimbabwe),<br />

and an increasingly oppressive media environment in that country. Zimbabwe<br />

needs to be singled out not only for leading the pack in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

alerts it attracted, but also because <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> these alerts. They deal with<br />

arrests, detentions and imprisonments <strong>of</strong> journalists; journalists being taken<br />

for questioning by the police; physical attacks on journalists by ruling and<br />

opposition party supporters; legal action against journalists - <strong>of</strong>ten based on<br />

oppressive and archaic legislation; frequent government threats to close or<br />

ban newspapers; attempts to introduce a statutory <strong>Media</strong> Council to licence<br />

journalists and to impose a state-approved code <strong>of</strong> conduct for journalists;<br />

politically-motivated dismissals and demotions <strong>of</strong> journalists in state-controlled<br />

media and other forms <strong>of</strong> intimidation and harassment.<br />

Zambia<br />

Zambia took a backseat to its neighbour, Zimbabwe, with fewer alerts issued on<br />

that country. However, government interference in the media, acts <strong>of</strong> intimidation<br />

and arrests under Zambia’s infamous defamation laws remain rampant.<br />

Swaziland<br />

Exactly one year ago the Swazi government banned The Guardian <strong>of</strong> Swaziland<br />

newspaper and The Nation magazine. Even a positive court ruling in favour <strong>of</strong><br />

unbanning The Guardian had no effect on the Government’s resolve to silence<br />

So This Is Democracy? 277

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!