Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />
detention.<br />
Once AIPPA was enacted 14 journalists and editors found themselves in<br />
custody at various times, charged with the crime <strong>of</strong> “publishing falsehoods”.<br />
This carries a maximum two-year imprisonment term. In all, 44 media practitioners<br />
were arrested in 2002. Of these, two cases were prosecuted to completion,<br />
six had charges withdrawn, 22 were released without charge, one<br />
was deported and 13 cases are pending. Despite several false stories in statefunded<br />
newspapers, however, not one journalist or editor from this sector<br />
was arrested and charged.<br />
The first prosecution was that <strong>of</strong> Andrew Meldrum, a Guardian correspondent.<br />
In a victory for press freedom and under immense government pressure<br />
Magistrate Godfrey Macheyo dismissed the charges, highlighting the inadequate<br />
drafting <strong>of</strong> the false news provision and ruling that strict liability was<br />
not intended. Meldrum was immediately served with deportation papers<br />
signed by the Home Affairs minister. He has challenged the constitutionality<br />
<strong>of</strong> his removal and remains in Zimbabwe pending the outcome <strong>of</strong> his case.<br />
The only other matter pursued under the false news provision has been referred<br />
to the Supreme Court for argument on its constitutionality and the<br />
matter remains outstanding. The Information Ministry has, however, effectively<br />
conceded the unconstitutionality <strong>of</strong> this and several other sections by<br />
placing revised provisions before Parliament in the Access to Information<br />
and Protection <strong>of</strong> Privacy Amendment Bill.<br />
Journalists were also persecuted under other legislation. Two journalists filming<br />
the leader <strong>of</strong> the opposition who was on his to a police station situated<br />
near the State House were detained and charged under the Protected Areas<br />
Act for having filmed the State House. The Attorney General refused to<br />
prosecute. The Zimbabwe Independent editor was charged under the Censorship<br />
Act for publishing a photograph <strong>of</strong> an Amazonian in (scant) traditional<br />
attire. A Daily Mirror reporter, Tawanda Majoni, was arrested for writing<br />
a story questioning the state <strong>of</strong> health <strong>of</strong> the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Police. As<br />
a former policeman, the journalist was prosecuted, convicted and jailed for<br />
desertion under the Police Act. He is however out <strong>of</strong> custody pending the<br />
hearing <strong>of</strong> an appeal he made. Two AFP journalists were forced to leave<br />
Zimbabwe after their re-registration applications were denied.<br />
2002<br />
Criminal defamation charges were laid against several independent journalists<br />
and editors for various articles, including a report on the First Lady’s<br />
brother soliciting her help to resolve a labour dispute, and one relating to the<br />
beheading <strong>of</strong> an opposition supporter by ZANU-PF members (which was<br />
later found to be false and retracted). Public <strong>of</strong>ficials lodged personal claims<br />
based on articles exposing their corrupt practices. Due to the State’s refusal<br />
170 So This Is Democracy?