13.11.2014 Views

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

By Irene Petras.<br />

Petras is lawyer by pr<strong>of</strong>ession and a human rights activist. Presently she is<br />

working for the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights as a Coordinator. She<br />

also works as a consultant for various organisations in Zimbabwe.<br />

“... Negative publicity has damaged the economy <strong>of</strong> this country... The<br />

negative reports that were relied upon by the international community<br />

were mostly fabricated or exaggerated or sensationalised stories <strong>of</strong> violence...<br />

In the interest <strong>of</strong> protecting public security and economic well-being<br />

it is necessary ... to make such potentially disastrous journalistic practices<br />

criminal at the strict liability level.”<br />

Affidavit <strong>of</strong> Minister <strong>of</strong> Information and Publicity, Jonathan Moyo,<br />

in Association <strong>of</strong> Independent Journalists <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe & 2 Ors -v-<br />

Minister <strong>of</strong> State for Information and Publicity & 2 Ors SC 252/02)<br />

Such statements were indicative <strong>of</strong> the government’s attitude in handling the<br />

private media in 2002. Independent media practitioners strove to expose corruption,<br />

maladministration and socio-economic decay in Zimbabwe. The State,<br />

however, refused to tolerate critical analysis <strong>of</strong> a disputed electoral process,<br />

state-sponsored political violence and a flawed land reform programme; it<br />

utilised publicly owned information machinery to apologise for its policies<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ten misled its readers/listeners.<br />

The private media was threatened and attacked throughout 2002, particularly<br />

by Information Minister Jonathan Moyo, the Army-General, the police and<br />

even President Mugabe, who accused the sector <strong>of</strong> “peddling lies, exaggerations<br />

and manufacturing news” (Alert Update 18/03/02). This occurred usually<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> articles considered detrimental to the respectability and<br />

authority <strong>of</strong> the ruling party and State organs.<br />

2002<br />

Journalists’ homes were raided; several were barred from, or assaulted whilst,<br />

covering public events. The violence did not spare public media journalists<br />

who were on some occasions harassed by opposition party supporters and a<br />

ZBC cameraperson was once severely beaten by soldiers. Several foreign<br />

journalists were denied accreditation to cover the presidential elections in<br />

March. The Daily News <strong>of</strong>fices and community radio stations Voice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

People (VOP) and Radio Dialogue were raided; documentation and tapes were<br />

illegally removed. Most seriously the Daily News’ Bulawayo <strong>of</strong>fices were<br />

petrol-bombed, as was the printing press <strong>of</strong> a company that produced opposition<br />

campaign material. A bomb destroyed the entire VOP premises in August.<br />

Police have failed to charge a single person in any attack.<br />

During 2002 the private media was forced to operate in the most restrictive<br />

168 So This Is Democracy?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!