Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />
2002<br />
from a state-owned and controlled<br />
broadcaster to a public service, independent<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>essionally run broadcaster.<br />
It is an indisputable fact that in<br />
its current form, and as suggested by<br />
government in their bill, ZNBC is a<br />
propaganda machinery <strong>of</strong> the ruling<br />
Movement for Multiparty Democracy<br />
(MMD),” the statement read.<br />
The initiative to introduce the private<br />
members’ bills has been driven<br />
by MISA’s Zambian chapter, known<br />
locally as ZIMA.<br />
ALERT<br />
DATE: 2002-11-14<br />
PERSON(S): Arthur Simuchoba,<br />
Chali Nondo<br />
VIOLATION(S): Victory<br />
On November 12, 2002, the Supreme<br />
Court dismissed an application made<br />
by President Levy Mwanawasa’s lawyer,<br />
Michael Mundashi. Mundashi<br />
was seeking the citation <strong>of</strong> Arthur<br />
Simuchoba, editor <strong>of</strong> the privatelyowned<br />
newspaper “The Monitor”,<br />
and Chali Nondo, his chief reporter,<br />
for “contempt <strong>of</strong> court”, for commenting<br />
on an ongoing election petition<br />
against Mwanawasa’s election in December<br />
2001.<br />
On September 16, Mundashi applied<br />
to the court to cite the journalists<br />
for “contempt <strong>of</strong> court” in relation<br />
to an article published in the 16<br />
to 19 August edition <strong>of</strong> “The Monitor”,<br />
which alleged that Mwanawasa<br />
had increased Supreme Court judges’<br />
salaries “to s<strong>of</strong>ten the judiciary ahead<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Presidential petition hearing.”<br />
Mundashi told all seven Supreme<br />
Court judges that the story, entitled<br />
“Levy back-pedals on early polls”,<br />
had cast doubt on the integrity <strong>of</strong> his<br />
164 So This Is Democracy?<br />
client and the judicial process. He<br />
further argued that the newspaper<br />
should have avoided publishing comments<br />
suggesting that the president<br />
had influenced the court into ruling<br />
in his favour through the salary increment,<br />
because such reporting was<br />
prejudicial to a fair trial.<br />
However, in his November 12 ruling,<br />
Chief Justice Ernest Sakala said<br />
that though he found the report to be<br />
“very sarcastic,” the matter could not<br />
be dealt with by the court. He suggested<br />
that the case be handled by the<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Public Prosecutions, using<br />
relevant Penal Code provisions.<br />
Justice Sakala noted that both the<br />
media and politicians with an interest<br />
in the election petition had made<br />
comments about the proceedings that<br />
might be prejudicial to a fair trial.<br />
“We view with grave concern the<br />
ongoing statements in the press and<br />
comments by the media and some individuals<br />
on this particular petition.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> these statements and comments<br />
in fact tend to cast aspersions<br />
on the court itself while others are<br />
deliberately calculated opinions on<br />
what individuals think the final verdict<br />
in this petition should be,” Justice<br />
Sakala said. He warned all parties<br />
to limit their comments on the<br />
trial to factual statements or risk being<br />
cited for contempt.<br />
President Mwanawasa’s December<br />
2001 election is being challenged<br />
in the Supreme Court by three opposition<br />
party leaders, who allege that<br />
he was dubiously elected.<br />
The case has attracted widespread<br />
comment in the media, with both the<br />
president and those challenging his<br />
election saying they would win the<br />
case.