Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ZAMBIA<br />
State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />
newspaper and chairman <strong>of</strong> Zambia<br />
Independent <strong>Media</strong> Association<br />
(ZIMA), was briefly detained by a<br />
Lusaka magistrate on June 10, 2002.<br />
This follows the same magistrate’s<br />
dismissal <strong>of</strong> his application for a case<br />
in which he was found in contempt<br />
<strong>of</strong> court to be referred to the High<br />
Court for determination <strong>of</strong> constitutional<br />
issues.<br />
On May 17, Magistrate John<br />
Njapau found Phiri in contempt <strong>of</strong><br />
court for publishing an article commenting<br />
on a matter that was before<br />
the court. Phiri was then summoned<br />
to appear before the magistrate on 4<br />
June to show why he should not be<br />
jailed for the alleged <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />
During his June 4 court appearance,<br />
Phiri, who represented himself, argued<br />
that since the alleged contempt<br />
was not committed in court, the matter<br />
should be referred to the Director<br />
<strong>of</strong> Public Prosecutions (DPP), who<br />
would be the right person to prosecute.<br />
Alternatively, he argued, the matter<br />
was to be referred to the High Court<br />
for determination <strong>of</strong> constitutional issues,<br />
because the case infringed on<br />
press freedom.<br />
But in his June 10 ruling, the magistrate<br />
said a matter became active<br />
when an individual was arrested. By<br />
publishing the article, the magistrate<br />
said, Phiri was in contempt <strong>of</strong> court.<br />
He rejected the notion that he should<br />
refer the matter to the DPP or the High<br />
Court.<br />
After the ruling, Phiri applied for<br />
an adjournment because his leading<br />
defence lawyer was out <strong>of</strong> town. The<br />
magistrate granted the application but<br />
ordered that Phiri be remanded in custody<br />
until his lawyer was present in<br />
court.<br />
Phiri was only saved from further<br />
detention when his lawyer applied for<br />
bail, which was granted. Phiri was<br />
released about two hours later, when<br />
the bail formalities were concluded.<br />
The case has been adjourned until<br />
June 26.<br />
ALERT<br />
DATE: 2002-06-13<br />
PERSON(S): Newspaper vendors<br />
VIOLATION(S): Beaten<br />
On June 6, 2002, several newspaper<br />
vendors were violently attacked and<br />
injured by a group <strong>of</strong> people believed<br />
to be members <strong>of</strong> the ruling Movement<br />
<strong>of</strong> Multiparty Democracy<br />
(MMD), in a bid to stop them from<br />
selling newspapers believed to be<br />
critical <strong>of</strong> President Levy<br />
Mwanawasa.<br />
Eyewitnesses identified Norman<br />
Sakala, an MMD member, as the<br />
group’s leader. The group, armed with<br />
knives, machetes, chains and<br />
knobkerries, attacked newspaper vendors<br />
selling the privately-owned publications<br />
“The Post”, “Today” and<br />
“The People” at the Lusaka City Centre<br />
and in surrounding areas.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the victims, Julius Mulenga,<br />
told “The Post” newspaper that he was<br />
forced into a minibus used by the attackers<br />
and severely beaten. Another<br />
victim, Robby Chasaya, told the<br />
newspaper that his hands were slashed<br />
with a knife and he sustained a broken<br />
tooth. Other vendors reportedly<br />
had cuts on their heads, faces and<br />
hands.<br />
Police spokesperson Lemmy<br />
Kajoba confirmed receiving a report<br />
<strong>of</strong> the attacks against the vendors. He<br />
also stated that the police had<br />
So This Is Democracy? 159