13.11.2014 Views

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />

important achievement was the tabling before parliament <strong>of</strong> three media bills,<br />

which are likely to be passed into law early in 2003.<br />

The ascension <strong>of</strong> legal practitioner Mwanawasa to the presidency and his proclaimed<br />

“New Deal administration <strong>of</strong> laws and not men” gave the media and<br />

general public a glimmer <strong>of</strong> hope that there would be a more responsive government<br />

attitude in the debate on media reform in the country. This was, however,<br />

not forthcoming. The mistreatment <strong>of</strong> journalists by police and political<br />

party cadres continued unabated and Section 69 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code, which creates<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> criminal libel against the president, continued to be flagrantly<br />

applied. The government was still very eager to keep its hold on ZNBC.<br />

However, this time around the ruling MMD government’s stance on the media<br />

and media reforms was met with a more concerted, determined and unprecedented<br />

opposing force fuelled by a unity <strong>of</strong> purpose on the part <strong>of</strong> media<br />

practitioners.<br />

The differences between the Press Association <strong>of</strong> Zambia (PAZA), which represents<br />

mainly government controlled media organisations and employees,<br />

and the Zambia Independent <strong>Media</strong> Association (ZIMA), which comprises<br />

independent media organisations and freelance journalists, were buried and<br />

the two organisations began to work together in the fight for greater press<br />

freedom in Zambia. The Zambia <strong>Media</strong> Women Association (ZAMWA) and<br />

the Association <strong>of</strong> Senior Journalists joined them.<br />

These media organisations collectively intensified the lobbying <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong><br />

parliament where they already had an allies in Dipak Patel, a long time proponent<br />

<strong>of</strong> a free press in Zambia, and Sakwiba Sikota, a vice president in the<br />

major opposition party, the United Party for Development (UPND), and defence<br />

lawyer for many journalists dragged to the courts during Chiluba’s rule.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> lobbying and other concerted advocacy activities was the proposal<br />

that the ZNBC Act be repealed and replaced by a new Broadcasting Act<br />

under which ZNBC would not have any licensing powers as is currently the<br />

case and would be treated equally with other broadcasters. In addition the<br />

new act would remove the Minister’s powers to appoint the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />

<strong>of</strong> ZNBC and therefore the appointment <strong>of</strong> the chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />

It was further proposed that an Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA) be<br />

established to regulate broadcasting and that a Freedom <strong>of</strong> Information Act<br />

be enacted.<br />

2002<br />

A document was prepared on the proposals and presented to government and<br />

was received with a surprise response. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Information and Broadcasting<br />

had already submitted proposals, including the repeal <strong>of</strong> the ZNBC<br />

142 So This Is Democracy?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!